7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predictive Modelling of Current and Future Potential Distribution of the Spectacled Bear ( Tremarctos ornatus) in Amazonas, Northeast Peru

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          The spectacled, or Andean, bear ( Tremarctos ornatus) is threatened by human activities, despite being a key species for conservation. In our study, the sightings and tracks for spectacled bear were collected, key environmental variables affecting its distribution were identified, and its distribution was predicted under both current and future (2050 and 2070) conditions in Amazonas, northeastern Peru. Under current conditions, areas with “high”, “moderate” and “low” probability for the spectacled bear distribution cover about 1.99% (836.22 km 2), 14.46% (6081.88 km 2) and 20.73% (8718.98 km 2) of Amazonas, respectively. Under all future conditions, the “high” probability area will increase, while the “moderate” and “low” probability areas, as well as total area (sum of “high”, “moderate” and “low”), will decrease. The, protected natural areas in Amazonas, currently and in the future, do not cover most of the important habitats for the spectacled bear. Therefore, to effectively conserve this species, it is strongly recommended that areas with “high” (even “moderate”) probability and the main ecosystems it inhabits should be designated as priority areas for research and conservation (even in natural protected areas). We assume that our study will make a strong contribution towards the sustainable conservation for spectacled bear under such threaten conditions.

          Abstract

          The spectacled, or Andean, bear ( Tremarctos ornatus) is classified as vulnerable by the IUCN due to climate change and human-induced habitat fragmentation. There is an urgent need for the conservation of spectacled bear at real time. However, the lack of knowledge about the distribution of this species is considered as one of the major limitations for decision-making and sustainable conservation. In this study, 92 geo-referenced records of the spectacled bear, 12 environmental variables and the MaxEnt entropy modelling have been used for predictive modelling for the current and future (2050 and 2070) potential distribution of the spectacled bear in Amazonas, northeastern Peru. The areas of “high”, “moderate” and “low” potential habitat under current conditions cover 1.99% (836.22 km 2), 14.46% (6081.88 km 2) and 20.73% (8718.98 km 2) of the Amazon, respectively. “High” potential habitat will increase under all climate change scenarios, while “moderate” and “low” potential habitat, as well as total habitat, will decrease over the time. The “moderate”, “low” and total potential habitat are distributed mainly in Yunga montane forest, combined grasslands/rangelands and secondary vegetation and Yunga altimontane (rain) forest, while “high” potential habitat is also concentrated in the Jalca. The overall outcome showed that the most of the important habitats of the spectacled bear are not part of the protected natural areas of Amazonas, under current as well as under future scenarios.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

          A representation and interpretation of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve obtained by the "rating" method, or by mathematical predictions based on patient characteristics, is presented. It is shown that in such a setting the area represents the probability that a randomly chosen diseased subject is (correctly) rated or ranked with greater suspicion than a randomly chosen non-diseased subject. Moreover, this probability of a correct ranking is the same quantity that is estimated by the already well-studied nonparametric Wilcoxon statistic. These two relationships are exploited to (a) provide rapid closed-form expressions for the approximate magnitude of the sampling variability, i.e., standard error that one uses to accompany the area under a smoothed ROC curve, (b) guide in determining the size of the sample required to provide a sufficiently reliable estimate of this area, and (c) determine how large sample sizes should be to ensure that one can statistically detect differences in the accuracy of diagnostic techniques.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animals (Basel)
                Animals (Basel)
                animals
                Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
                MDPI
                2076-2615
                06 October 2020
                October 2020
                : 10
                : 10
                : 1816
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva (INDES-CES), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas 01001, Peru; ebarboza@ 123456indes-ces.edu.pe (E.B.C.); cristobal.torres@ 123456untrm.edu.pe (C.T.G.); alexander.cotrina@ 123456untrm.edu.pe (D.A.C.S.); betty.guzman@ 123456untrm.edu.pe (B.K.G.V.); soliva@ 123456indes-ces.edu.pe (M.O.); rsalas@ 123456indes-ces.edu.pe (R.S.L.)
                [2 ]Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Piatkowska 94, 60-649 Poznan, Poland; subhajit.bandopadhyay@ 123456up.poznan.pl
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: gmeza@ 123456indes-ces.edu.pe (G.M.M.); nrojas@ 123456indes-ces.edu.pe (N.B.R.B.); Tel.: +51-996-907-768 (G.M.M.); +51-949-667-638 (N.B.R.B.)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-6725
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9628-8138
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0868-9511
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0097-3289
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2184-6761
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-6140
                Article
                animals-10-01816
                10.3390/ani10101816
                7650621
                33036157
                ee69361b-f154-4d84-9b8e-cf21f61dc597
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 September 2020
                : 28 September 2020
                Categories
                Article

                andean bear,biogeography,conservation,deforestation,ecological niche model (enm),maxent,protected areas,species distribution model (sdm)

                Comments

                Comment on this article