8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relation between Light Cone Distribution Amplitudes and Shape Function in B mesons

      Preprint
      , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Bakamjian-Thomas relativistic quark model provides a Poincar\'e representation of bound states with a fixed number of constituents and, in the heavy quark limit, form factors of currents satisfy covariance and Isgur-Wise scaling. We compute the Light Cone Distribution Amplitudes of \(B\) mesons \(\phi_{\pm}^B(\omega)\) as well as the Shape Function \(S(\omega)\), that enters in the decay \(B \to X_s \gamma\), that are also covariant in this class of models. The LCDA and the SF are related through the quark model wave function. The former satisfy, in the limit of vanishing constituent light quark mass, the integral relation given by QCD in the valence sector of Fock space. Using a gaussian wave function, the obtained \(S(\omega)\) is identical to the so-called Roman Shape Function. From the parameters for the latter that fit the \(B \to X_s\gamma\) spectrum we predict the behaviour of \(\phi_{\pm}^B(\omega)\). We discuss the important role played by the constituent light quark mass. In particular, although \(\phi_-^B(0) \not= 0\) for vanishing light quark mass, a non-vanishing mass implies the unfamiliar result \(\phi_-^B (0) = 0\). Moreover, we incorporate the short distance behaviour of QCD to \(\phi_+^B (\omega)\), which has sizeable effects at large \(\omega\). We obtain the values for the parameters \(\bar{\Lambda} \cong 0.35\) GeV and \(\lambda_B^{-1} \cong 1.43\) GeV\(^{-1}\). We compare with other theoretical approaches and illustrate the great variety of models found in the literature for the functions \(\phi_{\pm}^B (\omega)\); hence the necessity of imposing further constraints as in the present paper. We briefly review also the different phenomena that are sensitive to the LCDA.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          20 July 2007
          2008-01-29
          Article
          10.1103/PhysRevD.77.034005
          0707.3027
          eea3135c-27bf-4bfe-89a5-97b22f03119f
          History
          Custom metadata
          LPT Orsay 07-37
          Phys.Rev.D77:034005,2008
          6 figures
          hep-ph

          Comments

          Comment on this article