6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Confidence and central tendency in perceptual judgment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          U1 snRNP regulates cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro

          Stimulated cells and cancer cells have widespread shortening of mRNA 3’-untranslated regions (3’UTRs) and switches to shorter mRNA isoforms due to usage of more proximal polyadenylation signals (PASs) in introns and last exons. U1 snRNP (U1), vertebrates’ most abundant non-coding (spliceosomal) small nuclear RNA, silences proximal PASs and its inhibition with antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (U1 AMO) triggers widespread premature transcription termination and mRNA shortening. Here we show that low U1 AMO doses increase cancer cells’ migration and invasion in vitro by up to 500%, whereas U1 over-expression has the opposite effect. In addition to 3’UTR length, numerous transcriptome changes that could contribute to this phenotype are observed, including alternative splicing, and mRNA expression levels of proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressors. These findings reveal an unexpected role for U1 homeostasis (available U1 relative to transcription) in oncogenic and activated cell states, and suggest U1 as a potential target for their modulation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Confidence and certainty: distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals.

              When facing uncertainty, adaptive behavioral strategies demand that the brain performs probabilistic computations. In this probabilistic framework, the notion of certainty and confidence would appear to be closely related, so much so that it is tempting to conclude that these two concepts are one and the same. We argue that there are computational reasons to distinguish between these two concepts. Specifically, we propose that confidence should be defined as the probability that a decision or a proposition, overt or covert, is correct given the evidence, a critical quantity in complex sequential decisions. We suggest that the term certainty should be reserved to refer to the encoding of all other probability distributions over sensory and cognitive variables. We also discuss strategies for studying the neural codes for confidence and certainty and argue that clear definitions of neural codes are essential to understanding the relative contributions of various cortical areas to decision making.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
                Atten Percept Psychophys
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1943-3921
                1943-393X
                October 2021
                April 22 2021
                October 2021
                : 83
                : 7
                : 3024-3034
                Article
                10.3758/s13414-021-02300-6
                33890239
                eec634c6-4889-4e06-be18-dec0830d287b
                © 2021

                Free to read

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article