17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Losing Your Gut Feelings. Intuition in Depression

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Whereas in basic research, intuition has become a topic of great interest, clinical research and depression research in specific have not applied to the topic of intuition, yet. This is astonishing because a well-known phenomenon during depression is that patients have difficulties to judge and decide. In contrast to healthy individuals who take most daily life decisions intuitively ( Kahneman, 2011), depressed individuals seem to have difficulties to come to fast and adaptive decisions. The current article pursues three goals. First, our aim is to establish the hypothesis that intuition is impaired in depression against the background of influential theoretical accounts as well as empirical evidence from basic and clinical research. The second aim of the current paper is to provide explanations for recent findings on the depression-intuition interplay and to present directions for future research that may help to broaden our understanding of decision difficulties in depression. Third, we seek to propose ideas on how therapeutic interventions can support depressed individuals in taking better decisions. Even though our knowledge regarding this topic is still limited, we will tentatively launch the idea that an important first step may be to enhance patients’ access to intuitions. Overall, this paper seeks to introduce the topic of intuition to clinical research on depression and to hereby set the stage for upcoming theory and practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.

          In this article, the author describes a new theoretical perspective on positive emotions and situates this new perspective within the emerging field of positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory posits that experiences of positive emotions broaden people's momentary thought-action repertoires, which in turn serves to build their enduring personal resources, ranging from physical and intellectual resources to social and psychological resources. Preliminary empirical evidence supporting the broaden-and-build theory is reviewed, and open empirical questions that remain to be tested are identified. The theory and findings suggest that the capacity to experience positive emotions may be a fundamental human strength central to the study of human flourishing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving.

            Four experiments indicated that positive affect, induced by means of seeing a few minutes of a comedy film or by means of receiving a small bag of candy, improved performance on two tasks that are generally regarded as requiring creative ingenuity: Duncker's (1945) candle task and M. T. Mednick, S. A. Mednick, and E. V. Mednick's (1964) Remote Associates Test. One condition in which negative affect was induced and two in which subjects engaged in physical exercise (intended to represent affectless arousal) failed to produce comparable improvements in creative performance. The influence of positive affect on creativity was discussed in terms of a broader theory of the impact of positive affect on cognitive organization.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree.

              This article reports on an effort to explore the differences between two approaches to intuition and expertise that are often viewed as conflicting: heuristics and biases (HB) and naturalistic decision making (NDM). Starting from the obvious fact that professional intuition is sometimes marvelous and sometimes flawed, the authors attempt to map the boundary conditions that separate true intuitive skill from overconfident and biased impressions. They conclude that evaluating the likely quality of an intuitive judgment requires an assessment of the predictability of the environment in which the judgment is made and of the individual's opportunity to learn the regularities of that environment. Subjective experience is not a reliable indicator of judgment accuracy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                23 August 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 1291
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Vivantes Wenckebach Clinic – Clinic for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics Berlin, Germany
                [2] 2Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Hildesheim Hildesheim, Germany
                [3] 3Department of Clinical Psychology, Witten/Herdecke University Witten, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Michael Öllinger, Parmenides Foundation, Germany

                Reviewed by: Kinga Morsanyi, Queen’s University Belfast, UK; Nicola Baumann, University of Trier, Germany

                *Correspondence: Carina Remmers, remmers.carina@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Cognitive Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01291
                4993771
                27602015
                eed0bc34-942d-430c-9f35-c510cccdb731
                Copyright © 2016 Remmers and Michalak.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 April 2016
                : 12 August 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 109, Pages: 13, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Hypothesis and Theory

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                intuition,depression,automatic processes,decision-making,mood
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                intuition, depression, automatic processes, decision-making, mood

                Comments

                Comment on this article