1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Imaging Biomarkers of Osteoarthritis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Currently no disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug has been approved for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) that can reverse, hold, or slow the progression of structural damage of OA-affected joints. The reasons for failure are manifold and include the heterogeneity of structural disease of the OA joint at trial inclusion, and the sensitivity of biomarkers used to measure a potential treatment effect.

          This article discusses the role and potential of different imaging biomarkers in OA research. We review the current role of radiography, as well as advances in quantitative three-dimensional morphological cartilage assessment and semiquantitative whole-organ assessment of OA. Although magnetic resonance imaging has evolved as the leading imaging method in OA research, recent developments in computed tomography are also discussed briefly. Finally, we address the experience from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarker Consortium biomarker qualification study and the future role of artificial intelligence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references103

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice.

            Osteoarthritis is thought to be the most prevalent chronic joint disease. The incidence of osteoarthritis is rising because of the ageing population and the epidemic of obesity. Pain and loss of function are the main clinical features that lead to treatment, including non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical approaches. Clinicians recognise that the diagnosis of osteoarthritis is established late in the disease process, maybe too late to expect much help from disease-modifying drugs. Despite efforts over the past decades to develop markers of disease, still-imaging procedures and biochemical marker analyses need to be improved and possibly extended with more specific and sensitive methods to reliably describe disease processes, to diagnose the disease at an early stage, to classify patients according to their prognosis, and to follow the course of disease and treatment effectiveness. In the coming years, a better definition of osteoarthritis is expected by delineating different phenotypes of the disease. Treatment targeted more specifically at these phenotypes might lead to improved outcomes. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
                Semin Musculoskelet Radiol
                Georg Thieme Verlag KG
                1089-7860
                1098-898X
                February 08 2024
                February 2024
                February 08 2024
                February 2024
                : 28
                : 01
                : 014-025
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, Chobanian & Avedisian Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen & Friedrich Alexander Universität (FAU) Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
                [3 ]Center of Anatomy, and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation (LBIAR), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
                [4 ]Chondrometrics, GmbH, Freilassing, Germany
                [5 ]Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                [6 ]Department of Radiology, New York University Grossmann School of Medicine, New York, New York
                [7 ]Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [8 ]Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                [9 ]Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
                [10 ]Department of Radiology, Boston VA Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts
                Article
                10.1055/s-0043-1776432
                eed66279-af93-4ceb-9d03-b3234a64c0bd
                © 2024
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article