8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Value of Routinely Collected Data in Evaluating Home Assessment and Modification Interventions to Prevent Falls in Older People: Systematic Literature Review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Falls in older people commonly occur at home. Home assessment and modification (HAM) interventions can be effective in reducing falls; however, there are some concerns over the validity of evaluation findings. Routinely collected data could improve the quality of HAM evaluations and strengthen their evidence base.

          Objective

          The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the evidence of the use of routinely collected data in the evaluations of HAM interventions.

          Methods

          We searched the following databases from inception until January 31, 2020: PubMed, Ovid, CINAHL, OpenGrey, CENTRAL, LILACS, and Web of Knowledge. Eligible studies were those evaluating HAMs designed to reduce falls involving participants aged 60 years or more. We included study protocols and full reports. Bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.

          Results

          A total of 7 eligible studies were identified in 8 papers. Government organizations provided the majority of data across studies, with health care providers and third-sector organizations also providing data. Studies used a range of demographic, clinical and health, and administrative data. The purpose of using routinely collected data spanned recruiting and creating a sample, stratification, generating independent variables or covariates, and measuring key study-related outcomes. Nonhome-based modification interventions (eg, in nursing homes) using routinely collected data were not included in this study. We included two protocols, which meant that the results of those studies were not available. MeSH headings were excluded from the PubMed search because of a reduction in specificity. This means that some studies that met the inclusion criteria may not have been identified.

          Conclusions

          Routine data can be used successfully in many aspects of HAM evaluations and can reduce biases and improve other important design considerations. However, the use of these data in these studies is currently not widespread. There are a number of governance barriers to be overcome to allow these types of linkage and to ensure that the use of routinely collected data in evaluations of HAM interventions is exploited to its full potential.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

          Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Frailty in elderly people

            Frailty is the most problematic expression of population ageing. It is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homoeostasis after a stressor event and is a consequence of cumulative decline in many physiological systems during a lifetime. This cumulative decline depletes homoeostatic reserves until minor stressor events trigger disproportionate changes in health status. In landmark studies, investigators have developed valid models of frailty and these models have allowed epidemiological investigations that show the association between frailty and adverse health outcomes. We need to develop more efficient methods to detect frailty and measure its severity in routine clinical practice, especially methods that are useful for primary care. Such progress would greatly inform the appropriate selection of elderly people for invasive procedures or drug treatments and would be the basis for a shift in the care of frail elderly people towards more appropriate goal-directed care. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community

              Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Aging
                JMIR Aging
                JA
                JMIR Aging
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2561-7605
                Apr-Jun 2021
                23 April 2021
                : 4
                : 2
                : e24728
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Population Data Science Swansea University Swansea United Kingdom
                [2 ] Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom
                [3 ] Centre for Ageing and Dementia Research Swansea University Swansea United Kingdom
                [4 ] Leeds Institute of Health Sciences Swansea University Leeds United Kingdom
                [5 ] Public Health, Policy & Systems University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom
                [6 ] Care and Repair Cymru Cardiff United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Helen Daniels h.daniels@ 123456swansea.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-0333
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-2017
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7968-6679
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5972-1097
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-076X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6922-5115
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-0845
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5960-8262
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-0801
                Article
                v4i2e24728
                10.2196/24728
                8105762
                33890864
                eee06a91-4736-401f-a86f-90737fedecf9
                ©Helen Daniels, Joe Hollinghurst, Richard Fry, Andrew Clegg, Sarah Hillcoat-Nallétamby, Silviya Nikolova, Sarah E Rodgers, Neil Williams, Ashley Akbari. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 23.04.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 3 October 2020
                : 9 November 2020
                : 25 February 2021
                : 3 March 2021
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                falls,aged,routinely collected data,evaluation research,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article