4,437
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

      1 , 1
      Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test

          G Hommel (1988)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A sequentially rejective test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni inequality

            DROR ROM (1990)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Statistics in practice. Comparing the means of several groups.

              K Godfrey (1985)
              This article discusses statistical methods for comparing the means of several groups and focuses on examples from 50 Original Articles published in the Journal in 1978 and 1979. Although medical authors often present comparisons of the means of several groups, the most common method of analysis, multiple t-tests, is usually a poor choice. Which method of analysis is appropriate depends on what questions the investigators wish to ask. If the investigators want to identify which of the groups under study are different from the rest, they will need a different method from the one required if they wish simply to decide whether or not the groups share a common mean. More complicated questions about the group means call for more sophisticated techniques. Of the 50 Journal articles examined, 27 (54 per cent) used inappropriate statistical methods to analyze the differences between group means. Investigators need to become better acquainted with statistical techniques for making multiple comparisons between group means.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)
                Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)
                Wiley
                00359246
                January 1995
                January 1995
                December 05 2018
                : 57
                : 1
                : 289-300
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Tel Aviv University; Israel
                Article
                10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
                ef120090-90ea-4063-b8d0-82a75751b480
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article