18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Human physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for propofol

      research-article
      1 , , 2
      BMC Anesthesiology
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Propofol is widely used for both short-term anesthesia and long-term sedation. It has unusual pharmacokinetics because of its high lipid solubility. The standard approach to describing the pharmacokinetics is by a multi-compartmental model. This paper presents the first detailed human physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for propofol.

          Methods

          PKQuest, a freely distributed software routine http://www.pkquest.com, was used for all the calculations. The "standard human" PBPK parameters developed in previous applications is used. It is assumed that the blood and tissue binding is determined by simple partition into the tissue lipid, which is characterized by two previously determined set of parameters: 1) the value of the propofol oil/water partition coefficient; 2) the lipid fraction in the blood and tissues. The model was fit to the individual experimental data of Schnider et. al., Anesthesiology, 1998; 88:1170 in which an initial bolus dose was followed 60 minutes later by a one hour constant infusion.

          Results

          The PBPK model provides a good description of the experimental data over a large range of input dosage, subject age and fat fraction. Only one adjustable parameter (the liver clearance) is required to describe the constant infusion phase for each individual subject. In order to fit the bolus injection phase, for 10 or the 24 subjects it was necessary to assume that a fraction of the bolus dose was sequestered and then slowly released from the lungs (characterized by two additional parameters). The average weighted residual error (WRE) of the PBPK model fit to the both the bolus and infusion phases was 15%; similar to the WRE for just the constant infusion phase obtained by Schnider et. al. using a 6-parameter NONMEM compartmental model.

          Conclusion

          A PBPK model using standard human parameters and a simple description of tissue binding provides a good description of human propofol kinetics. The major advantage of a PBPK model is that it can be used to predict the changes in kinetics produced by variations in physiological parameters. As one example, the model simulation of the changes in pharmacokinetics for morbidly obese subjects is discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups?

          This study tested the hypothesis that body mass index (BMI) is representative of body fatness independent of age, sex, and ethnicity. Between 1986 and 1992, the authors studied a total of 202 black and 504 white men and women who resided in or near New York City, were ages 20-94 years, and had BMIs of 18-35 kg/m2. Total body fat, expressed as a percentage of body weight (BF%), was assessed using a four-compartment body composition model that does not rely on assumptions known to be age, sex, or ethnicity dependent. Statistically significant age dependencies were observed in the BF%-BMI relations in all four sex and ethnic groups (p values < 0.05-0.001) with older persons showing a higher BF% compared with younger persons with comparable BMIs. Statistically significant sex effects were also observed in BF%-BMI relations within each ethnic group (p values < 0.001) after controlling first for age. For an equivalent BMI, women have significantly greater amounts of total body fat than do men throughout the entire adult life span. Ethnicity did not significantly influence the BF%-BMI relation after controlling first for age and sex even though both black women and men had longer appendicular bone lengths relative to stature (p values < 0.001 and 0.02, respectively) compared with white women and men. Body mass index alone accounted for 25% of between-individual differences in body fat percentage for the 706 total subjects; adding age and sex as independent variables to the regression model increased the variance (r2) to 67%. These results suggest that BMI is age and sex dependent when used as an indicator of body fatness, but that it is ethnicity independent in black and white adults.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers.

            Unresolved issues with propofol include whether the pharmacokinetics are linear with dose, are influenced by method of administration (bolus vs. infusion), or are influenced by age. Recently, a new formulation of propofol emulsion, containing disodium edetate (EDTA), was introduced in the United States. Addition of EDTA was found by the manufacturer to significantly reduce bacterial growth. This study investigated the influences of method of administration, infusion rate, patient covariates, and EDTA on the pharmacokinetics of propofol. Twenty-four healthy volunteers aged 26-81 yr were given a bolus dose of propofol, followed 1 h later by a 60-min infusion. Each volunteer was randomly assigned to an infusion rate of 25, 50, 100, or 200 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Each volunteer was studied twice under otherwise identical circumstances: once receiving propofol without EDTA and once receiving propofol with EDTA. The influence of the method of administration and of the volunteer covariates was explored by fitting a three-compartment mamillary model to the data. The influence of EDTA was investigated by direct comparison of the measured concentrations in both sessions. The concentrations of propofol with and without EDTA were not significantly different. The concentration measurements after the bolus dose were significantly underpredicted by the parameters obtained just from the infusion data. The kinetics of propofol were linear within the infusion range of 25-200 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Age was a significant covariate for Volume2 and Clearance2, as were weight, height, and lean body mass for the metabolic clearance. These results demonstrate that method of administration (bolus vs. infusion), but not EDTA, influences the pharmacokinetics of propofol. Within the clinically relevant range, the kinetics of propofol during infusions are linear regarding infusion rate.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A priori prediction of tissue:plasma partition coefficients of drugs to facilitate the use of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models in drug discovery.

              The tissue:plasma (P(t:p)) partition coefficients (PCs) are important drug-specific input parameters in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models used to estimate the disposition of drugs in biota. Until now the use of PBPK models in early stages of the drug discovery process was not possible, since the estimation of P(t:p) of new drug candidates by using conventional in vitro and/or in vivo methods is too time and cost intensive. The objectives of the study were (i) to develop and validate two mechanistic equations for predicting a priori the rabbit, rat and mouse P(t:p) of non-adipose and non-excretory tissues (bone, brain, heart, intestine, lung, muscle, skin, spleen) for 65 structurally unrelated drugs and (ii) to evaluate the adequacy of using P(t:p) of muscle as predictors for P(t:p) of other tissues. The first equation predicts P(t:p) at steady state, assuming a homogenous distribution and passive diffusion of drugs in tissues, from a ratio of solubility and macromolecular binding between tissues and plasma. The ratio of solubility was estimated from log vegetable oil:water PCs (K(vo:w)) of drugs and lipid and water levels in tissues and plasma, whereas the ratio of macromolecular binding for drugs was estimated from tissue interstitial fluid-to-plasma concentration ratios of albumin, globulins and lipoproteins. The second equation predicts P(t:p) of drugs residing predominantly in the interstitial space of tissues. Therefore, the fractional volume content of interstitial space in each tissue replaced drug solubilities in the first equation. Following the development of these equations, regression analyses between P(t:p) of muscle and those of the other tissues were examined. The average ratio of predicted-to-experimental P(t:p) values was 1.26 (SD = 1.40, r = 0.90, n = 269), and 85% of the 269 predicted values were within a factor of three of the corresponding literature values obtained under in vivo and in vitro conditions. For predicted and experimental P(t:p), linear relationships (r > 0.9 in most cases) were observed between muscle and other tissues, suggesting that P(t:p) of muscle is a good predictor for the P(t:p) of other tissues. The two previous equations could explain the mechanistic basis of these linear relationships. The practical aim of this study is a worthwhile goal for pharmacokinetic screening of new drug candidates. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association J Pharm Sci 89:16-35, 2000
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Anesthesiol
                BMC Anesthesiology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2253
                2005
                22 April 2005
                : 5
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiology, University of Minnesota, 6–125 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. S. E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
                [2 ]Institut für Anästhesiologie, Kantonspital, CH-9007 Saint Gallen, Switzerland
                Article
                1471-2253-5-4
                10.1186/1471-2253-5-4
                1090550
                15847680
                ef39574b-99fd-4a38-9ff1-2bb4192d8577
                Copyright © 2005 Levitt and Schnider; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 4 May 2004
                : 22 April 2005
                Categories
                Research Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article