7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Challenging the understanding of significant improvement and outcome in schizophrenia – the concept of reliable and clinically significant change methods

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Significant changes of schizophrenia patients during inpatient treatment were evalutaed and compared to established outcome criteria. The concept of reliable and clinically significant change methods was applied to three hundred and ninety‐six patients suffering from a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. First, information on whether or not the change of the patient's condition is sufficient in order to declare that it is beyond a measurement error or random effect (= reliable change) was evaluated and in a second step it was observed if the reliable change was clinically meaningful (= clinically significant change). Different Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) thresholds were applied to define the clinically significant change (40, 45 and 50 points). These changes were then compared to established outcome criteria such as response and remission. Seventy‐nine of the 396 patients (20%) showed a reliable improvement of symptoms, whereas 70% improved without achieving a reliable change of their condition. Of the 79 patients achieving a reliable change during treatment 8‐15% concurrently showed a clinically significant change depending on the respective PANSS threshold. In contrast, 56% of the patients achieved response and 60% were in remission at discharge when applying established outcome criteria. Our results showed that a rather small number of schizophrenia patients were found to reliably change during inpatient treatment, with even less patients achieving a clinically significant change. The concept of reliable and clinically significant changes revealed to be a lot more stringent than today's established outcome criteria and should be critically evaluated regarding its use in schizophrenia patients. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

          Abstract

          Significant changes of schizophrenia patients during inpatient treatment were evalutaed and compared to established outcome criteria. The concept of reliable and clinically significant change methods was applied to three hundred and ninety‐six patients suffering from a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. First, information on whether or not the change of the patient's condition is sufficient in order to declare that it is beyond a measurement error or random effect (= reliable change) was evaluated and in a second step it was observed if the reliable change was clinically meaningful (= clinically significant change). Different Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) thresholds were applied to define the clinically significant change (40, 45 and 50 points). These changes were then compared to established outcome criteria such as response and remission. Seventy‐nine of the 396 patients (20%) showed a reliable improvement of symptoms, whereas 70% improved without achieving a reliable change of their condition. Of the 79 patients achieving a reliable change during treatment 8‐15% concurrently showed a clinically significant change depending on the respective PANSS threshold. In contrast, 56% of the patients achieved response and 60% were in remission at discharge when applying established outcome criteria. Our results showed that a rather small number of schizophrenia patients were found to reliably change during inpatient treatment, with even less patients achieving a clinically significant change. The concept of reliable and clinically significant changes revealed to be a lot more stringent than today's established outcome criteria and should be critically evaluated regarding its use in schizophrenia patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Int J Methods Psychiatr Res
          Int J Methods Psychiatr Res
          10.1002/(ISSN)1557-0657
          MPR
          International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
          John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
          1049-8931
          1557-0657
          14 July 2015
          March 2016
          : 25
          : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/mpr.v25.1 )
          : 3-11
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich Germany
          [ 2 ] Schoen Clinic Roseneck Prien am Chiemsee Germany
          [ 3 ] Psychiatric Clinic District Hospital Augsburg Germany
          [ 4 ] Psychiatric Clinic Inn‐Salzach Hospital Wasserburg/Inn Germany
          [ 5 ] Psychiatric Clinic Isar‐Amper Hospital Munich‐Haar Germany
          [ 6 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Hamburg Germany
          [ 7 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Mainz Germany
          [ 8 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Heinrich‐Heine‐University Duesseldorf Germany
          [ 9 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Cologne Germany
          [ 10 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charite Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Germany
          [ 11 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Bonn Germany
          [ 12 ] Department of Psychiatry Alsterdorf Hospital Hamburg Germany
          [ 13 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Göttingen Germany
          [ 14 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Tübingen Germany
          [ 15 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Essen Germany
          [ 16 ] Psychiatric Clinic Vinzenz‐von‐Paul‐Hospital Rottweil Germany
          Author notes
          [*] [* ] Correspondence

          Rebecca Schennach, Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336 München, Germany.

          Telephone (+49) 89 4400 55511

          Fax (+49) 89 4400-54749

          Email: Rebecca.Schennach@ 123456med.uni-muenchen.de

          Article
          PMC6877263 PMC6877263 6877263 MPR1476 IJMPR-Mar-2014-0013.R2
          10.1002/mpr.1476
          6877263
          26178421
          ef6ee390-adc3-4d4f-b27a-93e646566fb0
          Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
          History
          : 23 March 2014
          : 08 March 2015
          : 23 March 2015
          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Funding
          Funded by: German Federal Ministry for Education and Research BMBF
          Award ID: grant 01 GI 0233
          Categories
          Original Article
          Original Articles
          Custom metadata
          2.0
          March 2016
          Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.2 mode:remove_FC converted:15.11.2019

          outcome,clinically significant change,reliable change,schizophrenia

          Comments

          Comment on this article