45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Discrimination in the workplace, reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional study in 35 countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Whereas employment has been shown to be beneficial for people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) across different cultures, employers’ attitudes have been shown to be negative towards workers with MDD. This may form an important barrier to work participation. Today, little is known about how stigma and discrimination affect work participation of workers with MDD, especially from their own perspective. We aimed to assess, in a working age population including respondents with MDD from 35 countries: (1) if people with MDD anticipate and experience discrimination when trying to find or keep paid employment; (2) if participants in high, middle and lower developed countries differ in these respects; and (3) if discrimination experiences are related to actual employment status (ie, having a paid job or not).

          Method

          Participants in this cross-sectional study (N=834) had a diagnosis of MDD in the previous 12 months. They were interviewed using the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC-12). Analysis of variance and generalised linear mixed models were used to analyse the data.

          Results

          Overall, 62.5% had anticipated and/or experienced discrimination in the work setting. In very high developed countries, almost 60% of respondents had stopped themselves from applying for work, education or training because of anticipated discrimination. Having experienced workplace discrimination was independently related to unemployment.

          Conclusions

          Across different countries and cultures, people with MDD very frequently reported discrimination in the work setting. Effective interventions are needed to enhance work participation in people with MDD, focusing simultaneously on decreasing stigma in the work environment and on decreasing self-discrimination by empowering workers with MDD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Self-stigma and the "why try" effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices.

          Many individuals with mental illnesses are troubled by self-stigma and the subsequent processes that accompany this stigma: low self-esteem and self-efficacy. "Why try" is the overarching phenomenon of interest here, encompassing self-stigma, mediating processes, and their effect on goal-related behavior. In this paper, the literature that explains "why try" is reviewed, with special focus on social psychological models. Self-stigma comprises three steps: awareness of the stereotype, agreement with it, and applying it to one's self. As a result of these processes, people suffer reduced self-esteem and self-efficacy. People are dissuaded from pursuing the kind of opportunities that are fundamental to achieving life goals because of diminished self-esteem and self-efficacy. People may also avoid accessing and using evidence-based practices that help achieve these goals. The effects of self-stigma and the "why try" effect can be diminished by services that promote consumer empowerment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of mental disorders and trends from 1996 to 2009. Results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2.

            To present prevalences of lifetime and 12-month DSM-IV mood, anxiety, substance use and impulse-control disorders from the second Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS-2), and to compare the 12-month prevalence of mood, anxiety and substance use disorders with estimates from the first study (NEMESIS-1). Between November 2007 and July 2009, a nationally representative face-to-face survey was conducted using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0 among 6,646 subjects aged 18-64. Trends in 12-month prevalence of mental disorders were examined with these data and NEMESIS-1 data from 1996 (n = 7,076). Lifetime prevalence estimates in NEMESIS-2 were 20.2% for mood, 19.6% for anxiety, 19.1% for substance use disorder and 9.2% for impulse-control disorder. For 12-month disorders, these figures were 6.1, 10.1, 5.6 and 2.1%, respectively. Between 1996 and 2007-2009, the 12-month prevalence of anxiety and substance use disorder did not change. The prevalence of mood disorder decreased slightly but lost significance after controlling for differences in sociodemographic variables between the two studies. This study shows that in the Netherlands mental disorders are prevalent. In about a decade, no clear change in mental health status was found.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey.

              Depression is the third leading contributor to the worldwide burden of disease. We assessed the nature and severity of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by adults with major depressive disorder worldwide. Moreover, we investigated whether experienced discrimination is related to clinical history, provision of health care, and disclosure of diagnosis and whether anticipated discrimination is associated with disclosure and previous experiences of discrimination. In a cross-sectional survey, people with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder were interviewed in 39 sites (35 countries) worldwide with the discrimination and stigma scale (version 12; DISC-12). Other inclusion criteria were ability to understand and speak the main local language and age 18 years or older. The DISC-12 subscores assessed were reported discrimination and anticipated discrimination. Multivariable regression was used to analyse the data. 1082 people with depression completed the DISC-12. Of these, 855 (79%) reported experiencing discrimination in at least one life domain. 405 (37%) participants had stopped themselves from initiating a close personal relationship, 271 (25%) from applying for work, and 218 (20%) from applying for education or training. We noted that higher levels of experienced discrimination were associated with several lifetime depressive episodes (negative binomial regression coefficient 0·20 [95% CI 0·09-0·32], p=0·001); at least one lifetime psychiatric hospital admission (0·29 [0·15-0·42], p=0·001); poorer levels of social functioning (widowed, separated, or divorced 0·10 [0·01-0·19], p=0·032; unpaid employed 0·34 [0·09-0·60], p=0·007; looking for a job 0·26 [0·09-0·43], p=0·002; and unemployed 0·22 [0·03-0·41], p=0·022). Experienced discrimination was also associated with lower willingness to disclose a diagnosis of depression (mean discrimination score 4·18 [SD 3·68] for concealing depression vs 2·25 [2·65] for disclosing depression; p<0·0001). Anticipated discrimination is not necessarily associated with experienced discrimination because 147 (47%) of 316 participants who anticipated discrimination in finding or keeping a job and 160 (45%) of 353 in their intimate relationships had not experienced discrimination. Discrimination related to depression acts as a barrier to social participation and successful vocational integration. Non-disclosure of depression is itself a further barrier to seeking help and to receiving effective treatment. This finding suggests that new and sustained approaches are needed to prevent stigmatisation of people with depression and reduce the effects of stigma when it is already established. European Commission, Directorate General for Health and Consumers, Public Health Executive Agency. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2016
                22 February 2016
                : 6
                : 2
                : e009961
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Tranzo, Tilburg University , Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [2 ]King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry , London, UK
                [3 ]Mental Health Foundation , Glasgow, UK
                [4 ]National Institute for Health and Welfare , Vaasa, Finland
                [5 ]Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
                [6 ]Ibn Rushd University Psychiatric Centre , Casablanca, Morocco
                [7 ]Department of Psychiatry, Chi Mei Medical Centre , Tainan, Taiwan
                [8 ]St John's Medical College Hospital, St John's National Academy of Health Sciences , Bangalore, India
                [9 ]Sistema de Saúde Mãe de Deus , Porto Alegre, Brazil
                [10 ]Universidade Federal do Ceara , Campus Sobral, Brazil
                [11 ]Hospital Universitario de Caracas , Caracas, Venezuela
                [12 ]Associacao para o Estudo e Integracao Psicossocial , Lisbon, Portugal
                [13 ]Heinrich-Heine Universitat Dusseldorf, Rheinische Kliniken Dusseldorf , Germany
                [14 ]Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Belgrade, Serbia
                [15 ]Foundation of Psychiatry Clinic of Medical Faculty of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
                [16 ]Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona , Verona, Italy
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr EPM Brouwers; e.p.m.brouwers@ 123456tilburguniversity.edu
                Article
                bmjopen-2015-009961
                10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009961
                4769412
                26908523
                ef865402-92e3-4382-aad8-2d66f2fe182c
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 17 September 2015
                : 16 November 2015
                : 2 December 2015
                Categories
                Mental Health
                Research
                1506
                1712
                1716

                Medicine
                occupational & industrial medicine,discrimination,stigma,work,human development index
                Medicine
                occupational & industrial medicine, discrimination, stigma, work, human development index

                Comments

                Comment on this article