6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Unraveling the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced damage to human primordial follicle reserve: road to developing therapeutics for fertility preservation and reversing ovarian aging

      1 , 1 , 1
      Molecular Human Reproduction
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Among the investigated mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced damage to human primordial follicle reserve are induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and resultant apoptotic death, stromal–microvascular damage and follicle activation. Accumulating basic and translational evidence suggests that acute exposure to gonadotoxic chemotherapeutics, such as cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin, induces DNA DSBs and triggers apoptotic death of primordial follicle oocytes within 12–24 h, resulting in the massive loss of ovarian reserve. Evidence also indicates that chemotherapeutic agents can cause microvascular and stromal damage, induce hypoxia and indirectly affect ovarian reserve. While it is possible that the acute reduction of the primordial follicle reserve by massive apoptotic losses may result in delayed activation of some primordial follicles, this is unlikely to be a predominant mechanism of loss in humans. Here, we review these mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced ovarian reserve depletion and the potential reasons for the discrepancies among the studies. Based on the current literature, we propose an integrated hypothesis that explains both the acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced loss of primordial follicle reserve in the human ovary.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action.

          Cisplatin, cisplatinum, or cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II), is a well-known chemotherapeutic drug. It has been used for treatment of numerous human cancers including bladder, head and neck, lung, ovarian, and testicular cancers. It is effective against various types of cancers, including carcinomas, germ cell tumors, lymphomas, and sarcomas. Its mode of action has been linked to its ability to crosslink with the purine bases on the DNA; interfering with DNA repair mechanisms, causing DNA damage, and subsequently inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. However, because of drug resistance and numerous undesirable side effects such as severe kidney problems, allergic reactions, decrease immunity to infections, gastrointestinal disorders, hemorrhage, and hearing loss especially in younger patients, other platinum-containing anti-cancer drugs such as carboplatin, oxaliplatin and others, have also been used. Furthermore, combination therapies of cisplatin with other drugs have been highly considered to overcome drug-resistance and reduce toxicity. This comprehensive review highlights the physicochemical properties of cisplatin and related platinum-based drugs, and discusses its uses (either alone or in combination with other drugs) for the treatment of various human cancers. A special attention is paid to its molecular mechanisms of action, and its undesirable side effects. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fertility Preservation in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update

            Purpose To provide current recommendations about fertility preservation for adults and children with cancer. Methods A systematic review of the literature published from January 2013 to March 2017 was completed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library. An Update Panel reviewed the identified publications. Results There were 61 publications identified and reviewed. None of these publications prompted a significant change in the 2013 recommendations. Recommendations Health care providers should initiate the discussion on the possibility of infertility with patients with cancer treated during their reproductive years or with parents/guardians of children as early as possible. Providers should be prepared to discuss fertility preservation options and/or to refer all potential patients to appropriate reproductive specialists. Although patients may be focused initially on their cancer diagnosis, providers should advise patients regarding potential threats to fertility as early as possible in the treatment process so as to allow for the widest array of options for fertility preservation. The discussion should be documented. Sperm, oocyte, and embryo cryopreservation are considered standard practice and are widely available. There is conflicting evidence to recommend gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) and other means of ovarian suppression for fertility preservation. The Panel recognizes that, when proven fertility preservation methods are not feasible, and in the setting of young women with breast cancer, GnRHa may be offered to patients in the hope of reducing the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced ovarian insufficiency. GnRHa should not be used in place of proven fertility preservation methods. The panel notes that the field of ovarian tissue cryopreservation is advancing quickly and may evolve to become standard therapy in the future. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines .
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The PTEN-PI3K pathway: of feedbacks and cross-talks.

              The tumor suppressor PTEN was originally identified as a negative regulator of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling, a main regulator of cell growth, metabolism and survival. Yet this function of PTEN is extremely relevant for its tumor-suppressive ability, albeit the recent characterization of many PI3K-independent tumor-suppressive activities. PI3K-mediated PIP(3) production leads to the activation of the canonical AKT-mTORC1 pathway. The implications of this signaling cascade in health and disease have been underscored by the high number of regulators within the pathway whose alterations give rise to different malignancies, including familiar syndromes, metabolic dysfunctions and cancer. Moreover, PI3K is tightly buffered at multiple levels by downstream components, which have turned this signaling pathway literally upside down. PI3K and its downstream components in turn cross-talk with a number of other pathways, thereby leading to a complex network of signals that may have dramatic consequences when perturbed. Here, we review the current status of the PTEN-PI3K signaling pathway with special emphasis on the most recent data on targets and regulation of the PTEN-PI3K axis. This provides novel provocative therapeutic implications based on the targeted modulation of PI3K-cross-talking signals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Molecular Human Reproduction
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1460-2407
                August 2020
                August 01 2020
                June 08 2020
                August 2020
                August 01 2020
                June 08 2020
                : 26
                : 8
                : 553-566
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction and Fertility Preservation, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
                Article
                10.1093/molehr/gaaa043
                32514568
                efb70aff-a0dc-4983-b8f5-db699cf1ce16
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article