74
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical Efficacy and Tolerability of Praziquantel for Intestinal and Urinary Schistosomiasis—A Meta-analysis of Comparative and Non-comparative Clinical Trials

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , *
      PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Extensive use of praziquantel for treatment and control of schistosomiasis requires a comprehensive understanding of efficacy and safety of various doses for different Schistosoma species.

          Methodology/Principal Findings

          A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative and non-comparative trials of praziquantel at any dose for any Schistosoma species assessed within two months post-treatment. Of 273 studies identified, 55 were eligible (19,499 subjects treated with praziquantel, control treatment or placebo). Most studied were in school-aged children (64%), S. mansoni (58%), and the 40 mg/kg dose (56%); 68% of subjects were in Africa. Efficacy was assessed as cure rate (CR, n = 17,017) and egg reduction rate (ERR, n = 13,007); safety as adverse events (AE) incidence. The WHO-recommended dose of praziquantel 40 mg/kg achieved CRs of 94.7% (95%CI 92.2–98.0) for S. japonicum, 77.1% (68.4–85.1) for S. haematobium, 76.7% (95%CI 71.9–81.2) for S. mansoni, and 63.5% (95%CI 48.2–77.0) for mixed S. haematobium/S. mansoni infections. Using a random-effect meta-analysis regression model, a dose-effect for CR was found up to 40 mg/kg for S. mansoni and 30 mg/kg for S. haematobium. The mean ERR was 95% for S. japonicum, 94.1% for S. haematobium, and 86.3% for S. mansoni. No significant relationship between dose and ERR was detected. Tolerability was assessed in 40 studies (12,435 subjects). On average, 56.9% (95%CI 47.4–67.9) of the subjects receiving praziquantel 40 mg/kg experienced an AE. The incidence of AEs ranged from 2.3% for urticaria to 31.1% for abdominal pain.

          Conclusions/Significance

          The large number of subjects allows generalizable conclusions despite the inherent limitations of aggregated-data meta-analyses. The choice of praziquantel dose of 40 mg/kg is justified as a reasonable compromise for all species and ages, although in a proportion of sites efficacy may be lower than expected and age effects could not be fully explored.

          Author Summary

          Praziquantel is the drug used worldwide to treat intestinal and urinary schistosomiasis, diseases caused by the infection with different species of the parasitic worm Schistosoma. Summarizing findings of different studies is important in order to characterize how the parasite responds to treatment and to what extent humans can tolerate the medication. We found over 270 clinical trials on praziquantel, and, although less than one-third could be included in this analysis, the total number of subjects enrolled nears 20,000. This large number of subjects allows deriving general conclusions even though the methodologies used to conduct these studies (how the infection is diagnosed, how treatment effects are assessed) were not always uniform. These analyses confirm that the WHO-recommended praziquantel treatment (single dose of 40 mg/kg) works well on all species and at all ages, although in a proportion of study locations the levels of efficacy may be lower than expected.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk.

          An estimated 779 million people are at risk of schistosomiasis, of whom 106 million (13.6%) live in irrigation schemes or in close proximity to large dam reservoirs. We identified 58 studies that examined the relation between water resources development projects and schistosomiasis, primarily in African settings. We present a systematic literature review and meta-analysis with the following objectives: (1) to update at-risk populations of schistosomiasis and number of people infected in endemic countries, and (2) to quantify the risk of water resources development and management on schistosomiasis. Using 35 datasets from 24 African studies, our meta-analysis showed pooled random risk ratios of 2.4 and 2.6 for urinary and intestinal schistosomiasis, respectively, among people living adjacent to dam reservoirs. The risk ratio estimate for studies evaluating the effect of irrigation on urinary schistosomiasis was in the range 0.02-7.3 (summary estimate 1.1) and that on intestinal schistosomiasis in the range 0.49-23.0 (summary estimate 4.7). Geographic stratification showed important spatial differences, idiosyncratic to the type of water resources development. We conclude that the development and management of water resources is an important risk factor for schistosomiasis, and hence strategies to mitigate negative effects should become integral parts in the planning, implementation, and operation of future water projects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Albendazole and mebendazole administered alone or in combination with ivermectin against Trichuris trichiura: a randomized controlled trial.

              Single-dose albendazole and mebendazole show limited efficacy in the treatment of trichuriasis. The combination of albendazole with ivermectin improves efficacy, but a mebendazole-ivermectin combination has not been previously investigated. We performed a randomized controlled trial in 2 schools in Zanzibar, Tanzania, to assess the efficacy and safety of albendazole (400 mg) plus placebo, albendazole plus ivermectin (200 μg/kg), mebendazole (500 mg) plus placebo, and mebendazole plus ivermectin in children with a parasitologically confirmed Trichuris trichiura infection. Cure rate (CR) and egg reduction rate were assessed by intent-to-treat analysis. Adverse events were monitored within 48 h after treatment. Complete data records were available for 548 children. The highest CR against T. trichiura was achieved with a mebendazole-ivermectin combination (55%). Low CRs were observed with albendazole-ivermectin (38%), mebendazole (19%), and albendazole (10%). Compared with placebo, the use of ivermectin statistically significantly increased the CRs from 14% to 47% (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.28). The highest egg reduction rate (97%; 95% CI, 95%-98%) was observed using the mebendazole-ivermectin combination, followed by albendazole-ivermectin (91%; 95% CI, 87%-94%), mebendazole (67%; 95% CI, 52%-77%), and albendazole (40%; 95% CI, 22%-56%). The adverse events, reported by 136 children, were generally mild, with no significant difference between the treatment arms. Addition of ivermectin improves the therapeutic outcomes of both albendazole and mebendazole against T. trichiura and may be considered for use in soil-transmitted helminth control programs and individual patient management. isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN08336605.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                plos
                plosntds
                PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1935-2727
                1935-2735
                November 2014
                20 November 2014
                : 8
                : 11
                : e3286
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Independent researcher, Bangkok, Thailand
                [2 ]UNICEF/UNDP/WB/WHO Special Programme for Research & Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Geneva, Switzerland
                [3 ]Centre for Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
                University of Queensland, Australia
                Author notes

                I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: JZ received a grant from Merck Sereno SA to design and analyse the data. This does not alter our adherence to all PLOS policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JZ PLO. Performed the experiments: JZ PLO. Analyzed the data: JZ PLO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JZ PLO. Wrote the paper: JZ PLO. Designed the analysis: JZ PLO. Interpreted the data: JZ PLO. Prepared the manuscript: JZ PLO. Read and approved the final manuscript: JZ PLO.

                Article
                PNTD-D-14-00307
                10.1371/journal.pntd.0003286
                4238982
                25412105
                efd2b9b8-4eb5-4399-a53e-943c8fbfed91
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 21 February 2014
                : 22 September 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Funding
                JZ received a grant from Merck Serono SA ( http://www.merckserono.com). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Pharmacology
                Adverse Reactions
                Clinical Medicine
                Clinical Trials
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Methods
                Meta-Analysis
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Systematic Reviews
                Research Design
                Clinical Research Design
                Cohort Studies
                Custom metadata
                The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. The data are available as can be found in the publications extracted from eligible studies identified by the Cochrane collaboration through electronic searches from January 1, 1990, up to November 2012 of MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group's trials register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) using the search term 'praziquantel' published in English, French or Portuguese.

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article