6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Diverse Mycorrhizal Associations Enhance Terrestrial C Storage in a Global Model

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter?

          The decomposition and transformation of above- and below-ground plant detritus (litter) is the main process by which soil organic matter (SOM) is formed. Yet, research on litter decay and SOM formation has been largely uncoupled, failing to provide an effective nexus between these two fundamental processes for carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling and storage. We present the current understanding of the importance of microbial substrate use efficiency and C and N allocation in controlling the proportion of plant-derived C and N that is incorporated into SOM, and of soil matrix interactions in controlling SOM stabilization. We synthesize this understanding into the Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework. This framework leads to the hypothesis that labile plant constituents are the dominant source of microbial products, relative to input rates, because they are utilized more efficiently by microbes. These microbial products of decomposition would thus become the main precursors of stable SOM by promoting aggregation and through strong chemical bonding to the mineral soil matrix. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems - a journey towards relevance?

            Progress towards understanding the extent to which mycorrhizal fungi are involved in the mobilization of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from natural substrates is reviewed here. While mycorrhiza research has emphasized the role of the symbiosis in facilitation of capture of these nutrients in ionic form, attention has shifted since the mid-1980s to analysing the mycorrhizal fungal abilities to release N and P from the detrital materials of microbial faunal and plant origins, which are the primary sources of these elements in terrestrial ecosystems. Ericoid, and some ectomycorrhizal fungi have the potential to be directly involved in attack both on structural polymers, which may render nutrients inaccessible, and in mobilization of N and P from the organic polymers in which they are sequestered. The advantages to the plant of achieving intervention in the microbial mobilization-immobilization cycles are stressed. While the new approaches may initially lack the precision achieved in studies of readily characterized ionic forms of N and P, they do provide insights of greater ecological relevance. The results support the hypothesis that selection has favoured ericoid and ectomycorrhizal systems with well developed saprotrophic capabilities in those ecosystems characterized by retention of N and P as organic complexes in the soil. The need for further investigation of the abilities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to intervene in nutrient mobilization processes is stressed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age.

              Nitrogen (N) tends to limit plant productivity on young soils; phosphorus (P) becomes increasingly limiting in ancient soils because it gradually disappears through leaching and erosion. Plant traits that are regarded as adaptations to N- and P-limited conditions include mycorrhizas and cluster roots. Mycorrhizas 'scavenge' P from solution or 'mine' insoluble organic N. Cluster roots function in severely P-impoverished landscapes, 'mining' P fixed as insoluble inorganic phosphates. The 'scavenging' and 'mining' strategies of mycorrhizal species without and non-mycorrhizal species with cluster roots, respectively, allow functioning on soils that differ markedly in P availability. Based on recent advances in our understanding of these contrasting strategies of nutrient acquisition, we provide an explanation for the distribution of mycorrhizal species on less P-impoverished soils, and for why, globally, cluster-bearing species dominate on severely P-impoverished, ancient soils, where P sensitivity is relatively common.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Global Biogeochemical Cycles
                Global Biogeochem. Cycles
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                0886-6236
                1944-9224
                April 17 2019
                April 2019
                April 17 2019
                April 2019
                : 33
                : 4
                : 501-523
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Department of GeosciencesPrinceton University Princeton NJ USA
                [2 ]Sierra Nevada Research InstituteUniversity of California, Merced Merced CA USA
                [3 ]Environmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science InstituteOak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN USA
                [4 ]NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton NJ USA
                [5 ]Department of BiologyWest Virginia University Morgantown WV USA
                [6 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of Tennessee Knoxville TN USA
                [7 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyPrinceton University Princeton NJ USA
                [8 ]Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental BiologyColumbia University New York NY USA
                [9 ]Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International AffairsPrinceton University Princeton NJ USA
                [10 ]University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Frostburg MD USA
                Article
                10.1029/2018GB005973
                f001a9cf-8d58-4977-8bb8-057a5453f86e
                © 2019

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#am

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article