55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Subtype of GluN2 C-terminal Domain Determines the Response to Excitotoxic Insults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          It is currently unclear whether the GluN2 subtype influences NMDA receptor (NMDAR) excitotoxicity. We report that the toxicity of NMDAR-mediated Ca 2+ influx is differentially controlled by the cytoplasmic C-terminal domains of GluN2B (CTD 2B) and GluN2A (CTD 2A). Studying the effects of acute expression of GluN2A/2B-based chimeric subunits with reciprocal exchanges of their CTDs revealed that CTD 2B enhances NMDAR toxicity, compared to CTD 2A. Furthermore, the vulnerability of forebrain neurons in vitro and in vivo to NMDAR-dependent Ca 2+ influx is lowered by replacing the CTD of GluN2B with that of GluN2A by targeted exon exchange in a mouse knockin model. Mechanistically, CTD 2B exhibits stronger physical/functional coupling to the PSD-95-nNOS pathway, which suppresses protective CREB activation. Dependence of NMDAR excitotoxicity on the GluN2 CTD subtype can be overcome by inducing high levels of NMDAR activity. Thus, the identity (2A versus 2B) of the GluN2 CTD controls the toxicity dose-response to episodes of NMDAR activity.

          Highlights

          ► The CTD of GluN2B promotes excitotoxicity better than that of GluN2A ► GluN2 CTD subtype differences are seen in both WT and chimeric 2A/2B subunits ► The GluN2B CTD couples to a prodeath PSD-95/nNOS-dependent CREB shut-off pathway

          Abstract

          Martel et al. find that the two subtypes (2A versus 2B) of the GluN2 C-terminal domain differentially couple to the CREB shut-off pathway, causing distinct effects on NMDA receptor-mediated neuronal death both in vitro and in vivo.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Developmental and regional expression in the rat brain and functional properties of four NMDA receptors.

          An in situ study of mRNAs encoding NMDA receptor subunits in the developing rat CNS revealed that, at all stages, the NR1 gene is expressed in virtually all neurons, whereas the four NR2 transcripts display distinct expression patterns. NR2B and NR2D mRNAs occur prenatally, whereas NR2A and NR2C mRNAs are first detected near birth. All transcripts except NR2D peak around P20. NR2D mRNA, present mainly in midbrain structures, peaks around P7 and thereafter decreases to adult levels. Postnatally, NR2B and NR2C transcript levels change in opposite directions in the cerebellar internal granule cell layer. In the adult hippocampus, NR2A and NR2B mRNAs are prominent in CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cells, but NR2C and NR2D mRNAs occur in different subsets of interneurons. Recombinant binary NR1-NR2 channels show comparable Ca2+ permeabilities, but marked differences in voltage-dependent Mg2+ block and in offset decay time constants. Thus, the distinct expression profiles and functional properties of NR2 subunits provide a basis for NMDA channel heterogeneity in the brain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system.

            D Choi (1988)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              NMDA receptor subunits: diversity, development and disease

              Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11(3), 327-335
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neuron
                Neuron
                Neuron
                Cell Press
                0896-6273
                1097-4199
                10 May 2012
                10 May 2012
                : 74
                : 3
                : 543-556
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh School of Biomedical Sciences, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK
                [2 ]Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK
                [3 ]Wolfson College, University of Cambridge, Barton Road, Cambridge CB3 9BB, UK
                [4 ]Centre for Neuroregeneration, University of Edinburgh Chancellor's Building, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK
                [5 ]Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences and Centre for Neuroregeneration, University of Edinburgh Chancellor's Building, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author seth.grant@ 123456ed.ac.uk
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author giles.hardingham@ 123456ed.ac.uk
                [6]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                NEURON11082
                10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.021
                3398391
                22578505
                f00ec5fe-29bf-4ab0-8d07-a9d207136ec4
                © 2012 ELL & Excerpta Medica.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 1 March 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article