In 6 months, COVID-19 has wreaked havoc on the US health care system and economy.
As of July, the United States reported more than 3 million COVID-19 cases and more
than 130,000 deaths.
1
Real gross domestic product declined at a rate of 4.8% in the first quarter (after
growing by 2.1% in the fourth quarter of 2019).
2
In April, more than 20 million Americans reported losing their jobs. Across the country,
infection rates are increasing, and hospital and other resources are under significant
strain.
As devastating as these effects are, there is reason for guarded optimism. “Big Event”
disruptions like the pandemic present incredible challenges, but also offer unique
opportunities. With an understanding of history, health care leaders can navigate
near-term uncertainty while accelerating needed transformation. By doing so, the ultimate
impact of COVID-19 will be defined not by the aforementioned metrics but by its role
in driving 3 changes: (1) compelling provider organizations to act more as a “system,”
(2) transforming the care model to achieve the Quadruple Aim,
3
and (3) ensuring that care is organized around the consumer.
Understanding Big Events
Our team has analyzed past Big Event disruptions such as the 1918–1919 and 1957–1958
influenza pandemics, economic shocks such as the Great Depression and global financial
crisis of 2008, and the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
4
By looking across these Big Events, we have found 3 key principles to follow.
Principle #1: there is a silver lining
Despite having a near-term negative impact, Big Events create conditions favorable
to new growth. During the 1957–1958 influenza pandemic, Sony introduced its transistor
radio into the United States. The product sold more than 7 million units, created
a new industry category, and accelerated Japan's economy for the next decade. Businesses
facing greater financial and operating pressure focus more intently on what customers
want and innovate to address unmet needs. Consumers, facing their own constraints,
are forced to experiment with new ways of solving important needs. Following the 2008
financial crisis, many small businesses looked for alternative sources of capital.
Square, the payments start-up, tapped into this need and found quick success. Today,
Square, Airbnb, and other businesses created during the financial crisis have created
an estimated $250B of value.
To capture the silver lining, health care leaders need to adopt a growth mind-set.
Early in the pandemic, providers accumulated a large backlog of deferred appointments,
referrals, and procedures. Recapturing this backlog will require addressing consumers'
fears concerning safety and developing a trusted relationship with them. This provides
an opportunity for systems to make strides in innovating consumer experience and differentiating
from competitors to capture market share. Many systems are adopting a centrally coordinated
approach to offer consumer-friendly hours and the ability to schedule appointments
at the nearest location. To alleviate infection concerns, systems are aggressively
communicating efforts to ensure patient safety. Some systems are creating “COVID clinics”
to consolidate volume or creating stand-alone wards within existing facilities. Finally,
there has been tremendous growth in virtual visits, accelerated by growing consumer
demand, increasing physician adoption, and enabling government regulation.
Principle #2: not all behaviors are created equal
Big Events lead to changes in individual behavior – sometimes modest, sometimes more
substantial. In 2011 Londoners faced a 2-week strike that closed Underground stations,
forcing them to experiment with new commuting patterns. Post strike, 5% of commuters
stuck with their new routines. In contrast, airline volume did not return to pre-9/11
levels until 2005, changing the industry more permanently.
An important and largely unanswerable question surrounding Big Events is whether these
shifts will be temporary or permanent. Consider the explosive growth in virtual health.
Jefferson's JeffConnect telemedicine platform grew from ∼50 to ∼2500 virtual visits
per day in March. Many systems now must understand how much volume to expect from
this new delivery channel. The answer depends on whether observed behaviors by physicians,
consumers, and payors will persist.
Instead of trying to predict which of these new behaviors become habits, leaders need
to answer a different question. Which of these new behaviors do they want to encourage
to stick? Promoting desirable behaviors will require systems to understand an individual's
needs and to identify what levers to pull to influence that individual's behavior.
For example, many systems are accelerating decision-making through the creation of
centralized “Command Centers,” dedicated units that track real-time intelligence,
establish daily critical activities, and oversee rapid progress. These centers demonstrate
the value of certain behaviors: focusing on a limited set of clear priorities, communicating
frequently, and increasing data transparency. Additionally, many of our clients are
seeing greater collaboration across parts of the organization where, historically,
there has been friction.
Many leaders are concerned that this progress will subside as the pandemic passes.
At one health care system, executives wanted to adjust their operating model to reinforce
improvements in rapid decision-making. The system started by documenting new behaviors
such as being more collaborative, acting decisively, and taking greater ownership,
and tried to identify their root causes: smaller, focused teams with communications
and administrative support, new data-visualization techniques, and delegated authority.
To reinforce these behaviors, leadership eliminated an entire management committee
and replaced it with the expectation that accountable leaders will gather as needed
to resolve issues.
Principle #3: be bold: recover, reposition, and redesign
Because Big Events change behavior, systems' response strategies must seek to do more
than just recover. The goal is not to return to how things used to operate. With certain
habits being relaxed, this creates a window of opportunity to make bold changes before
individuals settle into new routines.
Consider Adobe. The software maker long wrestled with the decision to move to a Software-as-a-Service
(SaaS) model. During the 2008 financial crisis, it saw favorable conditions for action
and made a substantial acquisition to move entirely to SaaS. Over the next decade
Adobe transitioned from its largely product sales model to a consumer-centric model
with constant customer connectivity and predictable recurring revenues. As a result,
Adobe has tripled in size and its stock price appreciated at almost 30% per year.
The implication for health care leaders is clear. Beyond employing crisis management
techniques to stabilize near-term finances and operations, leaders must determine
how to reposition existing capabilities to maximize near-term resilience while also
redesigning the system to drive long-term sustainability. Some systems are exploring
transformative mergers and acquisitions, while others are looking to reshape their
market footprint, scope of services, workforce composition, and real estate portfolios.
Figure 1, created by the authors, outlines the key reposition and redesign considerations
for health systems.
FIG. 1.
Succeeding in a new normal.
The Impact of Big Events on Health Care
Acting more as a system
“Systemness” is an organizational and managerial approach that emphasizes the quality
and efficiency of the whole rather than the performance of each of the parts. Providers
have struggled to act as single systems, particularly ones that have grown through
acquisition. This has resulted in component organizations competing with each other
and decision-making inefficiencies. Moreover, incentives and other operating model
elements reinforce a focus on the “part” versus the “whole.”
A “systemness” approach produced pronounced benefits for Jefferson Health during the
pandemic response. The system recognized the value of enterprise-level planning while
dealing with urgent challenges of acquiring medical supplies, personal protective
equipment, and backfilling exposed staff. “Our whole is quite literally greater than
the sum of our parts. Leveraging the resources and talents of Jefferson's 14-hospital
health system and its university have maximized our overall response to the communities
that we serve.”
5
Likewise, during recovery, systems will need to centralize decision-making and coordination
to deal with increased financial and operational pressure, and ensure consistent quality
and experience across digital and analog touch points. For example, throughput management
should be applied consistently across the system to ensure effective social distancing
during scheduled visits. Systems need to be able to flexibly shift capacity across
facilities. Finally, virtual care requires system-level investment, shared technical
infrastructure, and coordination on issues such as safety and experience.
Transforming the care model
The term “care model” defines the who, what, where, and how for health services that
are delivered to a given individual, population, or patient cohort. Systems have made
notable progress in changing where and how care is delivered by driving incremental
shifts to lower intensity settings and utilizing a wider array of caregivers. Virtual
health has accelerated this trend and created potential for greater convenience, reduced
costs, and better utilization of physical capacity. Ambulatory models such as CVS
Health's HealthHubs, Walgreens partnership with VillageMD, and Walmart Health's Clinics
will likely only grow. COVID-19 also has strained health care workers, and care models
must incorporate more flexible work arrangements and expand available resources.
A significant opportunity for systems is to reconfigure their services – for example,
focusing more on behavioral health. The Kaiser Foundation reported that nearly half
of Americans feel COVID-19 has negatively impacted mental health.
6
In addition, COVID-19 casts greater light on racial and ethnic health disparities.
African Americans account for more than 30% of COVID hospitalizations yet represent
18% of the population studied.
7
Health systems have the opportunity to advance their portfolio and address these issues
by closing the digital divide for those at socioeconomic risk, developing new personalized
care models, and impacting broader health determinants through community partnerships.
Organizing around the consumer
Organizations with a strong consumer capability deeply understand an individual and
what drives behavior. While there is progress in this area, providers tend to have
an inward perspective: organizing around specialties and locations where services
are delivered. The fee-for-service economic model drives attention around the type
of insurance consumers have rather than an understanding of an individual's needs
and challenges.
The pandemic has the potential to accelerate the move to the consumer because it underscores
the importance of behaviors occurring outside the boundaries of health systems. Some
60% of people's health is determined by the choices they make and where they live.
8
During the pandemic, many consumers delayed critical health care procedures out of
concern for personal safety. Emergency department visits declined by more than 40%.
9
Necessary treatments for conditions such as diabetes, kidney disease, and cancer were
impacted significantly. With COVID-19, the decisions of individuals directly affect
the overall health of populations and the resulting challenges facing health systems.
For example, the individual decision to wear a mask and socially distance directly
affects the severity of the surge health systems have to manage and whether elective
procedures would be further affected.
Figure 2 highlights these concepts using a real-world example.
FIG. 2.
Hospital in home.
Conclusion
Big Event disruptions provide a unique window of opportunity for leaders to take bold
steps to ensure near-term resiliency and long-term sustainability. The hospital in
home model is emblematic of how health systems should consider big strategic moves
to drive shifts toward systemness, consumer-centricity, and care transformation. We
hope that these principles serve as inspiration for leaders to drive growth and accelerate
health care's transformation.