16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Diagnosis and Characterization of DSM-5 Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Disorder Using the Clinician-Administered Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Disorder Index

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite the inclusion of nonsuicidal self-injury disorder (NSSID) in the DSM-5, research on NSSID is limited and no studies have examined the full set of DSM-5 NSSID diagnostic criteria. Thus, this study examined the reliability and validity of a new structured diagnostic interview for NSSID (the Clinician-Administered NSSI Disorder Index; CANDI) and provides information on the clinical characteristics and features of DSM-5 NSSID. Data on the interrater reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the CANDI and associated characteristics of NSSID were collected in a community sample of young adults ( N = 107) with recent recurrent NSSI (≥10 lifetime episodes of NSSI, at least one episode in the past year). Participants completed self-report measures of NSSI characteristics, psychopathology, and emotion dysregulation, as well as diagnostic interviews of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and lifetime mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders. The CANDI demonstrated good interrater reliability and adequate internal consistency. Thirty-seven percent of participants met criteria for NSSID. NSSID was associated with greater clinical and diagnostic severity, including greater NSSI versatility, greater emotion dysregulation and psychopathology, and higher rates of BPD, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, social anxiety disorder, and alcohol dependence. Findings provide support for the reliability, validity, and feasibility of the CANDI.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          9431219
          20737
          Assessment
          Assessment
          Assessment
          1073-1911
          1552-3489
          19 June 2017
          20 January 2015
          October 2015
          11 July 2017
          : 22
          : 5
          : 527-539
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
          [2 ]Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Kim L. Gratz, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA. KLGratz@ 123456aol.com

          Katherine Dixon-Gordon is now at the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts.

          Article
          PMC5505727 PMC5505727 5505727 capmc6767
          10.1177/1073191114565878
          5505727
          25604630
          f0564a5a-672d-4ecb-93d6-565f5f8ef429

          Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav

          History
          Categories
          Article

          deliberate self-harm, DSM-5 ,borderline personality disorder,emotion regulation,diagnostic assessment,self-injury

          Comments

          Comment on this article