2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Considerations from the College of American Pathologists for Implementation of an Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Testing after a Change in Regulatory Status

      article-commentary

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the marketing of manufacturers’ in vitro diagnostic tests (IVDs), including assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The U.S. government’s Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988 regulates the studies that a clinical diagnostic laboratory needs to perform for an IVD before placing it into use. Until recently, the FDA has authorized the marketing of SARS-CoV-2 IVDs exclusively through the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) pathway. The regulatory landscape continues to evolve, and IVDs will eventually be required to pass through conventional non-EUA FDA review pathways once the emergency declaration is terminated, in order to continue to be marketed as an IVD in the United States. When FDA regulatory status of an IVD changes or is anticipated to change, the laboratory should review manufacturer information and previously performed internal verification studies to determine what, if any, additional studies are needed before implementing the non-EUA version of the IVD in accordance with CLIA regulations. Herein, the College of American Pathologists’ Microbiology Committee provides guidance for how to approach regulatory considerations when an IVD is converted from EUA to non-EUA status.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Validation of laboratory-developed molecular assays for infectious diseases.

          Molecular technology has changed the way that clinical laboratories diagnose and manage many infectious diseases. Excellent sensitivity, specificity, and speed have made molecular assays an attractive alternative to culture or enzyme immunoassay methods. Many molecular assays are commercially available and FDA approved. Others, especially those that test for less common analytes, are often laboratory developed. Laboratories also often modify FDA-approved assays to include different extraction systems or additional specimen types. The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) federal regulatory standards require clinical laboratories to establish and document their own performance specifications for laboratory-developed tests to ensure accurate and precise results prior to implementation of the test. The performance characteristics that must be established include accuracy, precision, reportable range, reference interval, analytical sensitivity, and analytical specificity. Clinical laboratories are challenged to understand the requirements and determine the types of experiments and analyses necessary to meet the requirements. A variety of protocols and guidelines are available in various texts and documents. Many of the guidelines are general and more appropriate for assays in chemistry sections of the laboratory but are applied in principle to molecular assays. This review presents information that laboratories may consider in their efforts to meet regulatory requirements.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Understanding, Verifying, and Implementing Emergency Use Authorization Molecular Diagnostics for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA

            The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has brought a new wave of challenges to health care, particularly in the area of rapid diagnostic test development and implementation. The diagnosis of acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is critically dependent on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from clinical specimens (e.g., nasopharyngeal swabs). While laboratory-developed testing for SARS-CoV-2 is an essential component of diagnostic testing for this virus, the majority of clinical microbiology laboratories are dependent on commercially available SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              All commend checklist:COM.40300.

              (2020)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                J Clin Microbiol
                J Clin Microbiol
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Microbiology
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                0095-1137
                1098-660X
                14 July 2021
                20 September 2021
                October 2021
                20 September 2021
                : 59
                : 10
                : e01167-21
                Affiliations
                [a ] Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicinegrid.471390.8, , New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [b ] Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [c ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
                [d ] Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
                [e ] Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
                [f ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
                [g ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolinagrid.259828.c, , Charleston, South Carolina, USA
                [h ] Florida Department of Healthgrid.410382.c, , Bureau of Public Health Laboratories, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
                [i ] Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
                [j ] Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [k ] Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [l ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Centergrid.414924.e, , Burlington, Vermont, USA
                Boston Children's Hospital
                Author notes

                Citation Peaper DR, Rhoads DD, Sullivan KV, Couturier MR, Humphries RM, Martin IW, Nolte FS, Rowlinson M-C, She RC, Simner PJ, Theel ES, Wojewoda CM. 2021. Considerations from the College of American Pathologists for implementation of an assay for SARS-CoV-2 testing after a change in regulatory status. J Clin Microbiol 59:e01167-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01167-21.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-5012
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6568-156X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4943-9220
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6134-151X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-2294
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-4612
                Article
                01167-21
                10.1128/JCM.01167-21
                8451421
                34260276
                f0952f37-37ee-4ce0-a0ec-99352de7bdc6
                Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.

                All Rights Reserved.

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted noncommercial re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 4, Pages: 4, Words: 2575
                Categories
                Commentary
                Custom metadata
                October 2021
                free

                Microbiology & Virology
                Microbiology & Virology

                Comments

                Comment on this article