8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Avoidable Adverse Events Related to Ignoring the Do-Not-Do Recommendations: A Retrospective Cohort Study Conducted in the Spanish Primary Care Setting

      research-article
      , PhD, MPH , , , , PhD, MSc , , , PhD, MPH § , , PhD, MD, MPH , , , MD ∗∗ , , PhD, MD, MPH †† , , MPH ‡‡ , , MD §§ , , PhD, MD, MPH ∥∥ , ¶¶
      Journal of Patient Safety
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      patient safety, medical error, medical overuse, primary care, AE = adverse event, AAE = avoidable adverse event, ATC = Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System, DND = do-not-do recommendations, GP = general practitioner, ICD = International Classification of Diseases, ICPC = International Classification of Primary Care, PED = pediatrician, PSA = prostate-specific antigen

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

          Abstract

          Objective

          This study aimed to measure the frequency and severity of avoidable adverse events (AAEs) related to ignoring do-not-do recommendations (DNDs) in primary care.

          Methods

          A retrospective cohort study analyzing the frequency and severity of AAEs related to ignoring DNDs (7 from family medicine and 3 from pediatrics) was conducted in Spain. Data were randomly extracted from computerized electronic medical records by a total of 20 general practitioners and 5 pediatricians acting as reviewers; data between February 2018 and September 2019 were analyzed.

          Results

          A total of 2557 records of adult and pediatric patients were reviewed. There were 1859 (72.7%) of 2557 (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.0%–74.4%) DNDs actions in 1307 patients (1507 were performed by general practitioners and 352 by pediatricians). Do-not-do recommendations were ignored more often in female patients ( P < 0.0001). Sixty-nine AAEs were linked to ignoring DNDs (69/1307 [5.3%]; 95% CI, 4.1%–6.5%). Of those, 54 (5.1%) of 1062 were in adult patients (95% CI, 3.8%–6.4%) and 15 (6.1%) of 245 in pediatric patients (95% CI, 3.1%–9.1%). In adult patients, the majority of AAEs (51/901 [5.7%]; 95% CI, 4.2%–7.2%) occurred in patients 65 years or older. Most AAEs were characterized by temporary minor harm both in adult patients (28/54 [51.9%]; 95% CI, 38.5%–65.2%) and pediatric patients (15/15 [100%]).

          Conclusions

          These findings provide a new perspective about the consequences of low-value practices for the patients and the health care systems. Ignoring DNDs could place patients at risk, and their safety might be unnecessarily compromised.

          Trial Registration Number

          NCT03482232.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

          This paper presents a general statistical methodology for the analysis of multivariate categorical data arising from observer reliability studies. The procedure essentially involves the construction of functions of the observed proportions which are directed at the extent to which the observers agree among themselves and the construction of test statistics for hypotheses involving these functions. Tests for interobserver bias are presented in terms of first-order marginal homogeneity and measures of interobserver agreement are developed as generalized kappa-type statistics. These procedures are illustrated with a clinical diagnosis example from the epidemiological literature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.

            Overuse, which is defined as the provision of medical services that are more likely to cause harm than good, is a pervasive problem. Direct measurement of overuse through documentation of delivery of inappropriate services is challenging given the difficulty of defining appropriate care for patients with individual preferences and needs; overuse can also be measured indirectly through examination of unwarranted geographical variations in prevalence of procedures and care intensity. Despite the challenges, the high prevalence of overuse is well documented in high-income countries across a wide range of services and is increasingly recognised in low-income countries. Overuse of unneeded services can harm patients physically and psychologically, and can harm health systems by wasting resources and deflecting investments in both public health and social spending, which is known to contribute to health. Although harms from overuse have not been well quantified and trends have not been well described, overuse is likely to be increasing worldwide.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Interventions Aimed at Reducing Use of Low-Value Health Services: A Systematic Review.

              The effectiveness of different types of interventions to reduce low-value care has been insufficiently summarized to allow for translation to practice. This article systematically reviews the literature on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce low-value care and the quality of those studies. We found that multicomponent interventions addressing both patient and clinician roles in overuse have the greatest potential to reduce low-value care. Clinical decision support and performance feedback are promising strategies with a solid evidence base, and provider education yields changes by itself and when paired with other strategies. Further research is needed on the effectiveness of pay-for-performance, insurer restrictions, and risk-sharing contracts to reduce use of low-value care. While the literature reveals important evidence on strategies used to reduce low-value care, meaningful gaps persist. More experimentation, paired with rigorous evaluation and publication, is needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Patient Saf
                J Patient Saf
                JPS
                Journal of Patient Safety
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                1549-8417
                1549-8425
                December 2021
                7 April 2021
                : 17
                : 8
                : e858-e865
                Affiliations
                From the []Health District Alicante-Sant Joan, Alicante
                []Miguel Hernández University, Elche
                []Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), Sant Joan d’Alacant
                [§ ]Patient Safety Observatory, Andalusian Agency for Health Care Quality, Seville
                []Family and Community Medicine, “La Jota” Health Centre, Zaragoza I Sector, Aragonese Health Service (SALUD)
                []University of Zaragoza, Aragon Health Research Institute (IISA), Zaragoza
                [∗∗ ]Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona
                [†† ]Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid Health Service, Madrid
                [‡‡ ]Healthcare Effectiveness and Safety Service, Navarre Health Service-Osasunbidea
                [§§ ]Institute of Public Health and Labour of Navarre, Pamplona
                [∥∥ ]Preventive Medicine Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
                [¶¶ ]Institute Ramón y Cajal for Health Research (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
                Author notes
                [*]Correspondence: José Joaquín Mira. Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Altamira Building, University Avenue, 03202 Elche, Spain (e-mail: jose.mira@ 123456umh.es ).
                Article
                JPS_210033 00032
                10.1097/PTS.0000000000000830
                8612910
                34009877
                f0c40a44-7d7f-4960-9ccc-f6299c5161db
                Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Categories
                Original Studies
                Custom metadata
                ONLINE-ONLY
                TRUE
                T

                patient safety,medical error,medical overuse,primary care,ae = adverse event,aae = avoidable adverse event,atc = anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system,dnd = do-not-do recommendations,gp = general practitioner,icd = international classification of diseases,icpc = international classification of primary care,ped = pediatrician,psa = prostate-specific antigen

                Comments

                Comment on this article