30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Segmentation of Sub-Lexical Morphemes in English-Learning 15-Month-Olds

      research-article
      1 , 2
      Frontiers in Psychology
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      language acquisition, morphology, infancy, speech perception, lexicon, psycholinguistics

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In most human languages, important components of linguistic structure are carried by affixes, also called bound morphemes. The affixes in a language comprise a relatively small but frequently occurring set of forms that surface as parts of words, but never occur without a stem. They combine productively with word stems and other grammatical entities in systematic and predictable ways. For example, the English suffix - ing occurs on verb stems, and in combination with a form of the auxiliary verb be, marks the verb with progressive aspect (e.g., was walking). In acquiring a language, learners must acquire rules of combination for affixes. However, prior to learning these combinatorial rules, learners are faced with discovering what the sub-lexical forms are over which the rules operate. That is, they have to discover the bound morphemes themselves. It is not known when English-learners begin to analyze words into morphological units. Previous research with learners of English found evidence that 18-month-olds have started to learn the combinatorial rules involving bound morphemes, and that 15-month-olds have not. However, it is not known whether 15-month-olds nevertheless represent the morphemes as distinct entities. This present study demonstrates that when 15-month-olds process words that end in -ing, they segment the suffix from the word, but they do not do so with endings that are not morphemes. Eight-month olds do not show this capacity. Thus, 15-month-olds have already started to identify bound morphemes and actively use them in processing speech.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.

          Learners rely on a combination of experience-independent and experience-dependent mechanisms to extract information from the environment. Language acquisition involves both types of mechanisms, but most theorists emphasize the relative importance of experience-independent mechanisms. The present study shows that a fundamental task of language acquisition, segmentation of words from fluent speech, can be accomplished by 8-month-old infants based solely on the statistical relationships between neighboring speech sounds. Moreover, this word segmentation was based on statistical learning from only 2 minutes of exposure, suggesting that infants have access to a powerful mechanism for the computation of statistical properties of the language input.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech.

            A series of four experiments examined infants' capacities to detect repeated words in fluent speech. In Experiment 1, 7 1/2-month old American infants were familiarized with two different monosyllabic words and subsequently were presented with passages which either included or did not include the familiar target words embedded in sentences. The infants listened significantly longer to the passages containing the familiar target words than to passages containing unfamiliar words. A comparable experiment with 6-month-olds provided no indication that infants at this age detected the target words in the passages. In Experiment 3, a group of 7 1/2-month-olds was familiarized with two different non-word targets which differed in their initial phonetic segment by only one or two phonetic features from words presented in two of the passages. These infants showed no tendency to listen significantly longer to the passages with the similar sounding words, suggesting that the infants may be matching rather detailed information about the items in the familiarization period to words in the test passages. Finally, Experiment 4 demonstrated that even when the 7 1/2-month-olds were initially familiarized with target words in sentential contexts rather than in isolation, they still showed reliable evidence of recognizing these words during the test phase. Taken together, the results of these studies suggest that some ability to detect words in fluent speech contexts is present by 7 1/2 months of age.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants.

              Numerous studies over the past decade support the claim that infants are equipped with powerful statistical language learning mechanisms. The primary evidence for statistical language learning in word segmentation comes from studies using artificial languages, continuous streams of synthesized syllables that are highly simplified relative to real speech. To what extent can these conclusions be scaled up to natural language learning? In the current experiments, English-learning 8-month-old infants' ability to track transitional probabilities in fluent infant-directed Italian speech was tested (N = 72). The results suggest that infants are sensitive to transitional probability cues in unfamiliar natural language stimuli, and support the claim that statistical learning is sufficiently robust to support aspects of real-world language acquisition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychology
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                06 February 2013
                2013
                : 4
                : 24
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [2] 2Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jutta L. Mueller, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany

                Reviewed by: LouAnn Gerken, University of Arizona, USA; Barbara Hoehle, University of Potsdam, Germany; Marieke Van Heugten, CNRS/EHESS/ENS, France

                *Correspondence: Toben H. Mintz, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, SGM 501, MC-1061, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA. e-mail: tmintz@ 123456usc.edu

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Language Sciences, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00024
                3565375
                23390420
                f0c8b342-cf7a-4353-808e-638af1ba82b4
                Copyright © 2013 Mintz.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 18 July 2012
                : 10 January 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 42, Pages: 12, Words: 11218
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                language acquisition,morphology,infancy,speech perception,lexicon,psycholinguistics

                Comments

                Comment on this article