29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The RhlR quorum-sensing receptor controls Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis and biofilm development independently of its canonical homoserine lactone autoinducer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Quorum sensing (QS) is a bacterial cell-to-cell communication process that relies on the production, release, and response to extracellular signaling molecules called autoinducers. QS controls virulence and biofilm formation in the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa possesses two canonical LuxI/R-type QS systems, LasI/R and RhlI/R, which produce and detect 3OC12-homoserine lactone and C4-homoserine lactone, respectively. Here, we use biofilm analyses, reporter assays, RNA-seq studies, and animal infection assays to show that RhlR directs both RhlI-dependent and RhlI-independent regulons. In the absence of RhlI, RhlR controls the expression of genes required for biofilm formation as well as genes encoding virulence factors. Consistent with these findings, Δ rhlR and Δ rhlI mutants have radically different biofilm phenotypes and the Δ rhlI mutant displays full virulence in animals whereas the Δ rhlR mutant is attenuated. The Δ rhlI mutant cell-free culture fluids contain an activity that stimulates RhlR-dependent gene expression. We propose a model in which RhlR responds to an alternative ligand, in addition to its canonical C4-homoserine lactone autoinducer. This alternate ligand promotes a RhlR-dependent transcriptional program in the absence of RhlI.

          Author summary

          Quorum sensing (QS) is a cell-to-cell communication process that bacteria use to coordinate group behaviors. QS is essential for virulence and biofilm formation in many bacteria including the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa has high clinical relevance because it has acquired resistance to commonly used antibiotics, and is a priority pathogen on the CDC ESKAPE pathogen list. The urgent need for new antimicrobials to combat P. aeruginosa infections makes targeting QS for interference an attractive approach. Here, we investigate P. aeruginosa under biofilm conditions that mimic authentic P. aeruginosa lifestyles in environmental and medical contexts rather than in traditional laboratory conditions. This strategy enabled us to find that P. aeruginosa uses a novel QS signal molecule that controls biofilm formation and virulence. The new signal molecule acts together with the long-known QS receptor RhlR. Using physiologic, genetic, and molecular studies, combined with animal models of infection, we characterize the roles of QS components in biofilm formation and virulence. We find that RhlR and the putative new signal molecule are crucial for both traits. Our work suggests that targeting RhlR with small molecule inhibitors could provide an exciting path forward for the development of novel antimicrobials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references81

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria.

          Bacteria communicate with one another using chemical signal molecules. As in higher organisms, the information supplied by these molecules is critical for synchronizing the activities of large groups of cells. In bacteria, chemical communication involves producing, releasing, detecting, and responding to small hormone-like molecules termed autoinducers . This process, termed quorum sensing, allows bacteria to monitor the environment for other bacteria and to alter behavior on a population-wide scale in response to changes in the number and/or species present in a community. Most quorum-sensing-controlled processes are unproductive when undertaken by an individual bacterium acting alone but become beneficial when carried out simultaneously by a large number of cells. Thus, quorum sensing confuses the distinction between prokaryotes and eukaryotes because it enables bacteria to act as multicellular organisms. This review focuses on the architectures of bacterial chemical communication networks; how chemical information is integrated, processed, and transduced to control gene expression; how intra- and interspecies cell-cell communication is accomplished; and the intriguing possibility of prokaryote-eukaryote cross-communication.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control.

            Quorum sensing is a process of cell-cell communication that allows bacteria to share information about cell density and adjust gene expression accordingly. This process enables bacteria to express energetically expensive processes as a collective only when the impact of those processes on the environment or on a host will be maximized. Among the many traits controlled by quorum sensing is the expression of virulence factors by pathogenic bacteria. Here we review the quorum-sensing circuits of Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Vibrio cholerae. We outline these canonical quorum-sensing mechanisms and how each uniquely controls virulence factor production. Additionally, we examine recent efforts to inhibit quorum sensing in these pathogens with the goal of designing novel antimicrobial therapeutics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum

              Despite the existence of fluorescent proteins spanning the entire visual spectrum, the bulk of modern imaging experiments continue to rely on variants of the green fluorescent protein derived from Aequorea victoria. Meanwhile, a great deal of recent effort has been devoted to engineering and improving red fluorescent proteins, and relatively little attention has been given to green and yellow variants. Here we report a novel monomeric yellow-green fluorescent protein, mNeonGreen, which is derived from a tetrameric fluorescent protein from the cephalochordate Branchiostoma lanceolatum. This fluorescent protein is the brightest monomeric green or yellow fluorescent protein yet described, performs exceptionally well as a fusion tag for traditional imaging as well as stochastic single-molecule superresolution imaging, and is an excellent FRET acceptor for the newest generation of cyan fluorescent proteins.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Pathog
                PLoS Pathog
                plos
                plospath
                PLoS Pathogens
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7366
                1553-7374
                17 July 2017
                July 2017
                : 13
                : 7
                : e1006504
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Princeton University, Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton, NJ, United States of America
                [2 ] Emory University School of Medicine, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Inc., Department of Pediatrics, and Center for Cystic Fibrosis and Airway Diseases Research, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
                [3 ] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, United States of America
                University of Maryland, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-4662
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-746X
                Article
                PPATHOGENS-D-17-00972
                10.1371/journal.ppat.1006504
                5531660
                28715477
                f0d8d37d-d4da-4bc1-8950-1c3b72103acc
                © 2017 Mukherjee et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 4 May 2017
                : 1 July 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 25
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000011, Howard Hughes Medical Institute;
                Award ID: NA
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000057, National Institute of General Medical Sciences;
                Award ID: 2R37GM065859
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001, National Science Foundation;
                Award ID: MCB-0948112
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009559, Life Sciences Research Foundation;
                Award ID: GBMF2550.06
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, NIH Grant 2R37GM065859, and National Science foundation Grant MCB-0948112 to BLB, and a Life Science Research Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship through the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant GBMF2550.06 to SM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Medical Microbiology
                Microbial Pathogens
                Bacterial Pathogens
                Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Pathogens
                Microbial Pathogens
                Bacterial Pathogens
                Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Bacteria
                Pseudomonas
                Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Bacteriology
                Bacterial Biofilms
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Biofilms
                Bacterial Biofilms
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Gene Expression
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Biofilms
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Phenotypes
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Animal Studies
                Animal Models of Disease
                Animal Models of Infection
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Animal Models of Infection
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Experimental Organism Systems
                Model Organisms
                Mouse Models
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Model Organisms
                Mouse Models
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Experimental Organism Systems
                Animal Models
                Mouse Models
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Pathogens
                Virulence Factors
                Custom metadata
                vor-update-to-uncorrected-proof
                2017-07-27
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article