8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prospective organization of neonatal arm movements: A motor foundation of embodied agency, disrupted in premature birth

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prospective motor control moves the body into the future, from where one is to where one wants to be. It is a hallmark of intentionality. But its origin in development is uncertain. In this study, we tested whether or not the arm movements of newborn infants were prospectively controlled. We measured the spatiotemporal organization of 480 full‐term neonatal arm movements and 384 arm movements of prematurely born infants at‐risk for neurodevelopmental disorder. We found 75% of healthy term‐birth neonatal movements and 68% of prematurely born infant movements conformed to the τ G ‐coupling model of prospective sensorimotor control. Prospective coupling values were significantly reduced in the latter ( p = .010, r = .087). In both cases prospectively controlled movements were tightly organized by fixed‐duration units with a base duration of 218 ms and additional temporal units of 145 ms. Yet distances remained constant. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time a precise prospective spatiotemporal organization of neonatal arm movements and demonstrate that at‐risk infants exhibit reduced sensorimotor control. Prospective motor control is a hallmark of primary sensorimotor intentionality and gives a strong embodied foundation to conscious motor agency.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Motor coordination in autism spectrum disorders: a synthesis and meta-analysis.

          Are motor coordination deficits an underlying cardinal feature of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)? Database searches identified 83 ASD studies focused on motor coordination, arm movements, gait, or postural stability deficits. Data extraction involved between-group comparisons for ASD and typically developing controls (N = 51). Rigorous meta-analysis techniques including random effects models, forest and funnel plots, I (2), publication bias, fail-safe analysis, and moderator variable analyses determined a significant standardized mean difference effect equal to 1.20 (SE = 0.144; p <0.0001; Z = 10.49). This large effect indicated substantial motor coordination deficits in the ASD groups across a wide range of behaviors. The current overall findings portray motor coordination deficits as pervasive across diagnoses, thus, a cardinal feature of ASD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective.

            Our ability to move is central to everyday life. Investigating the neural control of movement in general, and the cortical control of volitional arm movements in particular, has been a major research focus in recent decades. Studies have involved primarily either attempts to account for single-neuron responses in terms of tuning for movement parameters or attempts to decode movement parameters from populations of tuned neurons. Even though this focus on encoding and decoding has led to many seminal advances, it has not produced an agreed-upon conceptual framework. Interest in understanding the underlying neural dynamics has recently increased, leading to questions such as how does the current population response determine the future population response, and to what purpose? We review how a dynamical systems perspective may help us understand why neural activity evolves the way it does, how neural activity relates to movement parameters, and how a unified conceptual framework may result.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: a challenge for neuroscience and medicine.

              A broad range of evidence regarding the functional organization of the vertebrate brain - spanning from comparative neurology to experimental psychology and neurophysiology to clinical data - is reviewed for its bearing on conceptions of the neural organization of consciousness. A novel principle relating target selection, action selection, and motivation to one another, as a means to optimize integration for action in real time, is introduced. With its help, the principal macrosystems of the vertebrate brain can be seen to form a centralized functional design in which an upper brain stem system organized for conscious function performs a penultimate step in action control. This upper brain stem system retained a key role throughout the evolutionary process by which an expanding forebrain - culminating in the cerebral cortex of mammals - came to serve as a medium for the elaboration of conscious contents. This highly conserved upper brainstem system, which extends from the roof of the midbrain to the basal diencephalon, integrates the massively parallel and distributed information capacity of the cerebral hemispheres into the limited-capacity, sequential mode of operation required for coherent behavior. It maintains special connective relations with cortical territories implicated in attentional and conscious functions, but is not rendered nonfunctional in the absence of cortical input. This helps explain the purposive, goal-directed behavior exhibited by mammals after experimental decortication, as well as the evidence that children born without a cortex are conscious. Taken together these circumstances suggest that brainstem mechanisms are integral to the constitution of the conscious state, and that an adequate account of neural mechanisms of conscious function cannot be confined to the thalamocortical complex alone.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jonathan.delafield-butt@strath.ac.uk
                Journal
                Dev Sci
                Dev Sci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7687
                DESC
                Developmental Science
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1363-755X
                1467-7687
                19 June 2018
                November 2018
                : 21
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/desc.2018.21.issue-6 )
                : e12693
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Perception Movement Action Research Consortium The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
                [ 2 ] Laboratory for Innovation in Autism Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK
                [ 3 ] Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
                [ 4 ] School of Physics The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jonathan T. Delafield‐Butt, Laboratory for Innovation in Autism, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1QE, UK.

                Email: jonathan.delafield-butt@ 123456strath.ac.uk

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8881-8821
                Article
                DESC12693
                10.1111/desc.12693
                6220947
                29920860
                f0d9650b-cbd0-47d1-b5c3-013551e26e7c
                © 2018 The Authors. Developmental Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 29 May 2017
                : 18 April 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Pages: 16, Words: 13864
                Funding
                Funded by: NEST Adventure grant
                Funded by: Thought in Action
                Funded by: Royal Society of Edinburgh Caledonian Research Foundation Fellowship
                Categories
                Paper
                Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                desc12693
                November 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.5.1 mode:remove_FC converted:07.11.2018

                Developmental biology
                motor control,prospectivity,intentionality,neonate,embodiment,agency
                Developmental biology
                motor control, prospectivity, intentionality, neonate, embodiment, agency

                Comments

                Comment on this article