7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Digital transformation: A meta-review and guidelines for future research

      review-article
      a , , b
      Heliyon
      Elsevier
      Digital transformation, Meta-review, PRISMA, Organizations, Social, Technologies, Sustainability, Smart cities

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The emergence of digital transformation has changed the business landscape for the foreseeable future. As scholars advance their understanding and digital transformation begins to gain maturity, it becomes necessary to develop a synthesis to create solid foundations. To do so, significant steps need to be taken to critically, rigorously, and transparently examine the existing literature. Therefore, this article uses a meta-review with the support of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Protocol. As a result, we identified six dimensions and seventeen categories related to digital transformation. The organizational, technological, and social dimensions are still pivotal in digital transformation, while two new dimensions (sustainability and smart cities) still need to be explored in the existing literature. The need to deepen knowledge in digital transformation and refine the dimensions found is of paramount importance, as it involves some complexity due to organizational dynamics and the development of new technologies. It was also possible to identify opportunities, challenges, and future directions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.

          The evolution of the electronic age has led to the development of numerous medical databases on the World Wide Web, offering search facilities on a particular subject and the ability to perform citation analysis. We compared the content coverage and practical utility of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The official Web pages of the databases were used to extract information on the range of journals covered, search facilities and restrictions, and update frequency. We used the example of a keyword search to evaluate the usefulness of these databases in biomedical information retrieval and a specific published article to evaluate their utility in performing citation analysis. All databases were practical in use and offered numerous search facilities. PubMed and Google Scholar are accessed for free. The keyword search with PubMed offers optimal update frequency and includes online early articles; other databases can rate articles by number of citations, as an index of importance. For citation analysis, Scopus offers about 20% more coverage than Web of Science, whereas Google Scholar offers results of inconsistent accuracy. PubMed remains an optimal tool in biomedical electronic research. Scopus covers a wider journal range, of help both in keyword searching and citation analysis, but it is currently limited to recent articles (published after 1995) compared with Web of Science. Google Scholar, as for the Web in general, can help in the retrieval of even the most obscure information but its use is marred by inadequate, less often updated, citation information.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                07 January 2023
                January 2023
                07 January 2023
                : 9
                : 1
                : e12834
                Affiliations
                [a ]Industrial Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering, Lusofona University and EIGeS, Campo Grande, 1749-024, Lisbon, Portugal
                [b ]CISeD–Research Center in Digital Services, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Campus Politécnico, 3504-510, Viseu, Portugal
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. joao.reis@ 123456ulusofona.pt
                Article
                S2405-8440(23)00041-5 e12834
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12834
                9860428
                36691547
                f0ebf383-0e6b-47c8-8704-438b5bb9697c
                © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 May 2022
                : 28 December 2022
                : 3 January 2023
                Categories
                Review Article

                digital transformation,meta-review,prisma,organizations,social,technologies,sustainability,smart cities

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log