202
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Goats prefer positive human emotional facial expressions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Domestication has shaped the physiology and the behaviour of animals to better adapt to human environments. Therefore, human facial expressions may be highly informative for animals domesticated for working closely with people, such as dogs and horses. However, it is not known whether other animals, and particularly those domesticated primarily for production, such as goats, are capable of perceiving human emotional cues. In this study, we investigated whether goats can distinguish human facial expressions when simultaneously shown two images of an unfamiliar human with different emotional valences (positive/happy or negative/angry). Both images were vertically attached to a wall on one side of a test arena, 1.3 m apart, and goats were released from the opposite side of the arena (distance of 4.0 m) and were free to explore and interact with the stimuli during the trials. Each of four test trials lasted 30 s. Overall, we found that goats preferred to interact first with happy faces, meaning that they are sensitive to human facial emotional cues. Goats interacted first, more often and for longer duration with positive faces when they were positioned on the right side. However, no preference was found when the positive faces were placed on the left side. We show that animals domesticated for production can discriminate human facial expressions with different emotional valences and prefer to interact with positive ones. Therefore, the impact of domestication on animal cognitive abilities may be more far-reaching than previously assumed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The domestication of social cognition in dogs.

          Dogs are more skillful than great apes at a number of tasks in which they must read human communicative signals indicating the location of hidden food. In this study, we found that wolves who were raised by humans do not show these same skills, whereas domestic dog puppies only a few weeks old, even those that have had little human contact, do show these skills. These findings suggest that during the process of domestication, dogs have been selected for a set of social-cognitive abilities that enable them to communicate with humans in unique ways.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms.

            Recognizing emotion from facial expressions draws on diverse psychological processes implemented in a large array of neural structures. Studies using evoked potentials, lesions, and functional imaging have begun to elucidate some of the mechanisms. Early perceptual processing of faces draws on cortices in occipital and temporal lobes that construct detailed representations from the configuration of facial features. Subsequent recognition requires a set of structures, including amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex, that links perceptual representations of the face to the generation of knowledge about the emotion signaled, a complex set of mechanisms using multiple strategies. Although recent studies have provided a wealth of detail regarding these mechanisms in the adult human brain, investigations are also being extended to nonhuman primates, to infants, and to patients with psychiatric disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The earliest horse harnessing and milking.

              Horse domestication revolutionized transport, communications, and warfare in prehistory, yet the identification of early domestication processes has been problematic. Here, we present three independent lines of evidence demonstrating domestication in the Eneolithic Botai Culture of Kazakhstan, dating to about 3500 B.C.E. Metrical analysis of horse metacarpals shows that Botai horses resemble Bronze Age domestic horses rather than Paleolithic wild horses from the same region. Pathological characteristics indicate that some Botai horses were bridled, perhaps ridden. Organic residue analysis, using delta13C and deltaD values of fatty acids, reveals processing of mare's milk and carcass products in ceramics, indicating a developed domestic economy encompassing secondary products.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                R Soc Open Sci
                R Soc Open Sci
                RSOS
                royopensci
                Royal Society Open Science
                The Royal Society
                2054-5703
                August 2018
                29 August 2018
                29 August 2018
                : 5
                : 8
                : 180491
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London , London, UK
                [2 ]Institute of Behavioural Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology , Dummerstorf, Germany
                [3 ]Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office FSVO, Centre for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs , Agroscope Tänikon, Ettenhausen, Switzerland
                [4 ]Department of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil
                [5 ]Department of Public Politics and Public Health, Federal University of Sao Paulo , Santos, Brazil
                [6 ]Physiology Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich , Freising, Germany
                [7 ]Centre for Research in Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton , London, UK
                Author notes
                Authors for correspondence: Christian Nawroth e-mail: nawroth.christian@ 123456gmail.com
                Authors for correspondence: Alan G. McElligott e-mail: alan.mcelligott@ 123456roehampton.ac.uk

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4193819.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4582-4057
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0925-0650
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7388-7616
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5770-4568
                Article
                rsos180491
                10.1098/rsos.180491
                6124102
                30225038
                f15eafb4-5a2f-41d7-b7a4-d81fdce5a747
                © 2018 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 26 March 2018
                : 19 July 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: NA 1233/1-1
                Categories
                1001
                14
                42
                205
                Biology (Whole Organism)
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                August, 2018

                emotions,emotion perception,interspecific communication,livestock,social cognition

                Comments

                Comment on this article