8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How many are we missing with ID NOW COVID-19 assay using direct nasopharyngeal swabs? – Findings from a mid-sized academic hospital clinical microbiology laboratory

      editorial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Here, we retrospectively analyzed the comparative results of 182 paired dry nasopharyngeal swabs tested by Abbott ID NOW and nasopharyngeal swabs in viral transport medium by real-time RT-PCR methods. While the overall agreement was 96.2%, we found that of 15 samples that were tested positive with RT-PCR methods, 7 were missed by ID NOW, resulting in a false-negative rate of 47%.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
          Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis
          Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
          Elsevier Inc.
          0732-8893
          1879-0070
          4 July 2020
          4 July 2020
          : 115123
          Affiliations
          Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-409-772-5109. piren@ 123456utmb.edu
          Article
          S0732-8893(20)30500-9 115123
          10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115123
          7334653
          f17bfb4b-d885-448c-8ef0-798d52e859a9
          © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

          Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

          History
          : 18 May 2020
          : 23 June 2020
          : 26 June 2020
          Categories
          Article

          Microbiology & Virology
          ldt, laboratory-developed test,fda, food and drug administration,eua, emergency use authorization,np, nasopharyngeal,vtm, viral transport medium,nps-vtm, nasopharyngeal swabs in viral transport medium,dnps, direct dry nasopharyngeal swabs,covid-19, coronavirus disease 2019,sars-cov-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,ppa, positive percent agreement,npa, negative percent agreement,opa, overall percent agreement,sars-cov-2,covid-19, abbott id now,dry nasopharyngeal swab

          Comments

          Comment on this article