26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Export fluxes of dissolved inorganic carbon to the northern Indian Ocean from the Indian monsoonal rivers

      , , , ,
      Biogeosciences
      Copernicus GmbH

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Rivers are an important source of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) to the adjacent coastal waters. In order to examine the spatial variability in the distribution and major sources of DIC in the Indian monsoonal rivers and to quantify their export flux to the northern Indian Ocean, 27 major and medium-sized rivers were sampled during the discharge period. Significant spatial variability in concentrations of DIC (3.4–73.6<span class="thinspace"></span>mg<span class="thinspace"></span>L<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) was observed, and it is attributed to spatial variations in the precipitation pattern, the size of rivers, pollution and lithology of the catchments. The stable isotopic composition of DIC (<span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C<sub>DIC</sub></span>) also showed strong spatial variability (<span class="inline-formula">−13.0</span><span class="thinspace"></span>‰ to <span class="inline-formula">−1.4</span><span class="thinspace"></span>‰) in the Indian monsoonal rivers with relatively depleted <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C<sub>DIC</sub></span> values in rivers of the northwest of India (<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">11.1</mn><mo>±</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mn></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="58pt" height="10pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="43ce1814dae57cfc0d64e2819f46a7f5"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="bg-16-505-2019-ie00001.svg" width="58pt" height="10pt" src="bg-16-505-2019-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span><span class="thinspace"></span>‰) and enriched values in the southeast of India (<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mn><mo>±</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mn></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="52pt" height="10pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="efcd52ba21ec848d7f3427211cffb7a8"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="bg-16-505-2019-ie00002.svg" width="52pt" height="10pt" src="bg-16-505-2019-ie00002.png"/></svg:svg></span></span><span class="thinspace"></span>‰). Results of the linear least-squares regression models of Keeling and Miller–Tan's plots indicated that the chemical weathering of carbonate and silicate minerals by soil <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> is the major source of DIC in the Indian monsoonal rivers. Spatial variability in the deviation of <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C<sub>DIC</sub></span> from the approximated <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C</span> of the source may probably be due to dominant autotrophic production in rivers of the southeastern region, whereas heterotrophic decomposition of organic matter largely influences the other Indian monsoonal rivers. It is estimated that the Indian monsoonal rivers annually export <span class="inline-formula">∼10.3</span><span class="thinspace"></span>Tg of DIC to the northern Indian Ocean, of which the major fraction (75<span class="thinspace"></span>%) enters into the Bay of Bengal, and the remaining fraction reaches to the Arabian Sea. This is consistent with the freshwater flux, which is 3 times higher for the Bay of Bengal (<span class="inline-formula">∼378</span><span class="thinspace"></span>km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>3</sup></span><span class="thinspace"></span>yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) than for the Arabian Sea (122<span class="thinspace"></span>km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>3</sup></span><span class="thinspace"></span>yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>). Despite discharge from the Indian monsoonal rivers accounting for only 1.3<span class="thinspace"></span>% of the global freshwater discharge, they disproportionately export 2.5<span class="thinspace"></span>% of the total DIC exported by the world's major rivers. Despite rivers from the region in the southwest (SW) of India exporting DIC that is an order of magnitude lower (0.3<span class="thinspace"></span>Tg<span class="thinspace"></span>yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) than the rivers from other regions of India, the highest yield of DIC was found in the rivers of the SW region of India. It is attributed to intense precipitation (<span class="inline-formula">∼3000</span><span class="thinspace"></span>mm), favorable natural vegetation of tropical moist deciduous and tropical wet evergreen and semi-evergreen forests, tropical wet climate, high soil organic carbon, and the dominance of red loamy soils in catchments of the rivers of the SW region.</p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The carbonate-silicate geochemical cycle and its effect on atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past 100 million years

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outgassing from Amazonian rivers and wetlands as a large tropical source of atmospheric CO2.

            Terrestrial ecosystems in the humid tropics play a potentially important but presently ambiguous role in the global carbon cycle. Whereas global estimates of atmospheric CO2 exchange indicate that the tropics are near equilibrium or are a source with respect to carbon, ground-based estimates indicate that the amount of carbon that is being absorbed by mature rainforests is similar to or greater than that being released by tropical deforestation (about 1.6 Gt C yr-1). Estimates of the magnitude of carbon sequestration are uncertain, however, depending on whether they are derived from measurements of gas fluxes above forests or of biomass accumulation in vegetation and soils. It is also possible that methodological errors may overestimate rates of carbon uptake or that other loss processes have yet to be identified. Here we demonstrate that outgassing (evasion) of CO2 from rivers and wetlands of the central Amazon basin constitutes an important carbon loss process, equal to 1.2 +/- 0.3 Mg C ha-1 yr-1. This carbon probably originates from organic matter transported from upland and flooded forests, which is then respired and outgassed downstream. Extrapolated across the entire basin, this flux-at 0.5 Gt C yr-1-is an order of magnitude greater than fluvial export of organic carbon to the ocean. From these findings, we suggest that the overall carbon budget of rainforests, summed across terrestrial and aquatic environments, appears closer to being in balance than would be inferred from studies of uplands alone.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biogeosciences
                Biogeosciences
                Copernicus GmbH
                1726-4189
                2019
                January 30 2019
                : 16
                : 2
                : 505-519
                Article
                10.5194/bg-16-505-2019
                f19b6ebb-d2a4-44ca-9361-38baaa40249e
                © 2019

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article