27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Implicit Processes, Self-Regulation, and Interventions for Behavior Change

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ability to regulate and subsequently change behavior is influenced by both reflective and implicit processes. Traditional theories have focused on conscious processes by highlighting the beliefs and intentions that influence decision making. However, their success in changing behavior has been modest with a gap between intention and behavior apparent. Dual-process models have been recently applied to health psychology; with numerous models incorporating implicit processes that influence behavior as well as the more common conscious processes. Such implicit processes are theorized to govern behavior non-consciously. The article provides a commentary on motivational and volitional processes and how interventions have combined to attempt an increase in positive health behaviors. Following this, non-conscious processes are discussed in terms of their theoretical underpinning. The article will then highlight how these processes have been measured and will then discuss the different ways that the non-conscious and conscious may interact. The development of interventions manipulating both processes may well prove crucial in successfully altering behavior.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.

          A central theme in recent research on attitudes is the distinction between deliberate, "explicit" attitudes and automatic, "implicit" attitudes. The present article provides an integrative review of the available evidence on implicit and explicit attitude change that is guided by a distinction between associative and propositional processes. Whereas associative processes are characterized by mere activation independent of subjective truth or falsity, propositional reasoning is concerned with the validation of evaluations and beliefs. The proposed associative-propositional evaluation (APE) model makes specific assumptions about the mutual interplay of the 2 processes, implying several mechanisms that lead to symmetric or asymmetric changes in implicit and explicit attitudes. The model integrates a broad range of empirical evidence and implies several new predictions for implicit and explicit attitude change.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition.

              The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) is a modification of the Implicit Association Test that measures the strength of evaluative associations with a single attitude object. Across 3 different attitude domains--soda brand preferences, self-esteem, and racial attitudes--the authors found evidence that the SC-IAT is internally consistent and makes unique contributions in the ability to understand implicit social cognition. In a 4th study, the authors investigated the susceptibility of the SC-IAT to faking or self-presentational concerns. Once participants with high error rates were removed, no significant self-presentation effect was observed. These results provide initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the SC-IAT as an individual difference measure of implicit social cognition. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                08 March 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 346
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Sport, Health and Nutrition, Leeds Trinity University Leeds, UK
                [2] 2School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds Leeds, UK
                Author notes

                Edited by: Michael Noll-Hussong, University of Ulm, Germany

                Reviewed by: Alicia Abundis-Gutierrez, University of Guadalajara, Mexico; Berangere Thirioux, Unité de Recherche Clinique Pierre Deniker, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Henri Laborit, France

                *Correspondence: Tom St Quinton, t.stquinton@ 123456leedstrinity.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Psychology for Clinical Settings, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00346
                5340749
                28337164
                f1bae9a0-5548-4c5d-8e7c-bedb78087e9f
                Copyright © 2017 St Quinton and Brunton.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 December 2016
                : 23 February 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 84, Pages: 7, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Leeds Trinity University 10.13039/100010050
                Categories
                Psychology
                Mini Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                self-regulation,implicit,conscious,non-conscious,dual-process
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                self-regulation, implicit, conscious, non-conscious, dual-process

                Comments

                Comment on this article