12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of smoking with myocardial injury and clinical outcome in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

      research-article
      , , , , , ,
      Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
      BioMed Central
      19th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
      27-30 January 2016

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background There is evidence suggesting a positive effect of cigarette smoking on myocardial tissue reperfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction ("smoker's paradox"). We aimed to evaluate the relationship of smoking status with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-determined myocardial salvage and damage as well as clinical outcome in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods This multicenter study included 727 consecutive STEMI patients reperfused within 12 hours after symptom onset. CMR imaging parameters (area-at-risk [AAR], infarct size [IS], myocardial salvage index [MSI], and microvascular obstruction [MVO]) were compared according to admission smoking status. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates at 12 months after infarction were compared between groups. Results In our study cohort 339 (46.6%) patients were current smokers. There was no difference in the extent of AAR (35[24-47] vs. 37[27-49] %LV, p = 0.10), IS (16[8-25] vs. 17[10-26] %LV, p = 0.21), MSI (53[29-70] vs. 52[34-71], p = 0.47) or MVO (0[0-1.7] vs. 0[0-1.6] %LV, p = 0.91) between smokers and non-smokers. Smokers had lower MACE (3.8% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.01) and mortality (0.9% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.01) rates. However, after adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors, smoking was no longer associated with MACE (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.41, p = 0.34) or mortality (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.76, p = 0.27). Conclusions Smoking is not associated with PPCI efficacy (myocardial salvage) or irreversible myocardial damage in patients with acute STEMI. The lower MACE and mortality rates of smokers were entirely explained by differences in baseline risk characteristics, thus challenging the existence of a "smoker's paradox".

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Conference
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
          BioMed Central (London )
          1097-6647
          1532-429X
          27 January 2016
          2016
          : 18
          Issue : Suppl 1 Issue sponsor : Publication of this supplement was funded by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
          : Q19
          Affiliations
          Cardiology, Angiology, Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
          Article
          5355
          10.1186/1532-429X-18-S1-Q19
          5032803
          f1cc5f57-b2d4-4fd3-ae0a-07423906c04d
          © Eitel et al. 2016

          This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

          19th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
          Los Angeles, CA, USA
          27-30 January 2016
          History
          Categories
          Walking Poster Presentation
          Custom metadata
          © The Author(s) 2016

          Cardiovascular Medicine
          Cardiovascular Medicine

          Comments

          Comment on this article