10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Acupuncture for pediatric bilateral amblyopia

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Amblyopia is defined as a reduction in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of one or both eyes caused by conditions that affect abnormal visual development. It can be classified as strabismus, refractive, visual deprivation, and occlusion. Refractive amblyopia can be further classified into unilateral (anisometropic) or bilateral (isoametropic) amblyopia. Bilateral amblyopia can develop in children with a large degree of refractive error and/or astigmatism in both eyes, and the severity of the refractive error is reported to be directly related to amblyopia from the effect of blurred retinal images. According to an earlier study, spectacle correction for one year improved the bilateral refractive amblyopia in 74% of children (3–10 years). 1 Patching or atropine had to be performed in the sensitive period in patients who did not respond to spectacle correction, however, there is a controversy regarding its effectiveness, especially in children aged more than 7 years. 2 Acupuncture is widely used in to treat ophthalmological diseases in Asian countries, and several studies have demonstrated its efficacy in amblyopia. 3 However, no study has reported the efficacy of acupuncture in bilateral amblyopia. Herein, we present cases with bilateral amblyopia who failed to respond spectacle correction but showed improvement after acupuncture treatment. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who visited the Kimjoongho Korean Medical Clinic for bilateral refractive amblyopia. Patients having used spectacles for more than 12 months and aged between 5–13 years at the initial visit, with binocular visual acuity below 20/30 and spherical equivalent below -6.0 D or above 4.0 D and who consented for acupuncture treatment for six consecutive months were considered.1, 4 Patients were excluded if the interval between treatments was reported to be more than four weeks, the presence of neuro-ophthalmic conditions including strabismus or other abnormalities in the ocular media and retina was detected, or if other treatments such as patching or citicoline were initiated during the treatment period. Acupuncture treatment was performed by a Korean medical physician with over 10 years of experience. Stainless steel needles (30 mm long and 0.25 mm in diameter; Dong Bang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) were applied at 15 acupuncture points (LI4, BL1, BL2, GB14, TE23, Ex-HN5, and ST2 in bilateral, and EX-HN1 in unilateral). Needles were superficially pricked in children without Deqi. The acupuncture procedure lasted 15 min and had an infrared heat lamp over the eye to keep it warm. We recorded the patients’ BCVA at baseline and after six months using Han’s visual chart, 5 spherical equivalent and astigmatism at baseline, and the number of treatments sessions. Since Han’s visual chart was devised before the revision of the international standard in 1994, the visual acuity line interval was considered as 0.1. Selected patients included 4 boys and 3 girls with an average age of 9.26 years who underwent an average of 45.14 treatment sessions (Table 1). The binocular visual acuity improved above 20/30 after the acupuncture treatment in 4 patients (Case 2, 5, 6, and 7) that included 3 patients who had passed through the sensitive period (aged > 7). There were no adverse events reported during the treatment. Table 1 Patients’ characteristics and changes in visual acuity before and after the six-month acupuncture treatment. Table 1 Case Gender (M/F) Age (year) Treatment sessions Sphericalequivalent (OD/OS) Astigmatism (OD/OS) Visual acuity (OD/OS) Baseline After six-month treatment 1 M 5.11 46 −6.5/−6.75 −1.5/−1.75 0.2/0.2 0.4/0.3 2 F 6.4 53 6.75/4.25 −0.5/−1.5 0.4/0.4 0.7/0.7a 3 F 8.6 45 −6.25/−8.5 −1/−1.5 0.5/0.3 0.8/0.3 4 F 10.2 55 −8.75/−7.75 −/− 0.4/0.5 0.6/0.9 5 M 10.9 36 −6.75/−7.5 −3/−2.25 0.4/0.5 0.7/0.8a 6 M 11.5 44 −6.25/−6.25 −0.5/−1 0.4/0.5 0.7/0.8a 7 M 12.1 37 −6.25/−6.75 −2.25/−1.75 0.4/0.4 0.7/0.7a Total 4/3 9.26 ± 2.66 45.14 ± 7.20 0.39 ± 0.09 / 0.40 ± 0.12 0.66 ± 0.13 / 0.64 ± 0.24 a The case’s binocular visual acuity was above 20/30 after six-month of acupuncture treatment. Bilateral amblyopia is generally considered to be resulting from an insufficient stimulation to the cerebral cortex due to the input of blurred retinal images. Acupuncture increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in retinal cells, are known to improve visual function by regulating the production of dopamine and thus aiding in the recovery of amblyopia.6, 7 Earlier studies have reported that the retinal blood flow in children with amblyopia was reduced, 8 but it increased when the visual acuity was restored. 9 Peripheral acupuncture stimulates provides a local stimulus to the eye and increases retinal blood flow circulation, 10 thereby improving visual acuity. A limitation of this study was that the effects of optical correction could not be excluded completely, and to overcome this limitation, the study included the patients who failed one year of spectacle correction. We could not follow up for the treatment effect. Because the patients were subsequently received acupuncture treatment after evaluation. Moreover, a generalization of study results in case studies is never advisable. In spite of these limitations, this study is meaningful as it presents the first case series of bilateral amblyopia that improved with acupuncture treatment. Further studies exploring the efficacy of acupuncture in bilateral amblyopia as an adjuvant or salvage treatment would be worthwhile and interesting to conduct. Author contribution BK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. MHK: Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing. JK: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing - Review & Editing. SP: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing - review & editing. IC: Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing. Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Funding No financial support was received during the study. Ethical statement Parents of patients agreed using medical records. The institutional review boards approved this research (KOMCIRB 2018-09-008-001). Data availability Data will be made available upon request.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern®.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography in Children With Amblyopia

            This case-control study uses optical coherence tomographic angiography to examine the retinal and microvascular features of children with amblyopia. Question Are there microvascular abnormalities on optical coherence tomographic angiography in children (<18 years) with amblyopia? Findings In this case-control study of 63 eyes of 59 patients, reduced capillary density in the superficial and deep plexus in the central 6 × 6 mm of the macula was noted in amblyopic eyes but not in control eyes. Meaning This finding suggests amblyopic eyes have reduced retinal capillary density in the macula, but the clinical relevance of this finding remains to be determined. Importance Amblyopia is the most common cause of visual impairment in childhood, with a prevalence of 1% to 4% in children in the United States. To date, no studies using noninvasive optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA) have measured blood flow in the retinal capillary layers in children with amblyopia. Objective To evaluate the retinal and microvascular features using OCTA in children (<18 years) with amblyopia. Design, Setting, and Participants This observational case-control study enrolled patients from September 1, 2016, through May 31, 2017, and was conducted from September 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the Stein Eye Institute at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles). Participants included 59 children (<18 years) with amblyopia and without amblyopia examined at a pediatric ophthalmology clinic or referred to the clinic by coinvestigators. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmological examination, including visual acuity, refraction, and ocular motility tests; anterior and posterior segment examination; and OCTA. Main Outcomes and Measures Reduced superficial and deep retinal capillary vessel density on OCTA. Results Of the 63 eyes evaluated, 13 (21%) were amblyopic and 50 (79%) were control eyes. Of the 59 patients, the mean (SD) age of patients with amblyopia was 8.0 (4.0) years and 10.3 (3.3) years for the controls; 33 patients (56%) were female; and 5 of 13 (39%) and 27 of 46 (54%) patients in the amblyopic and control groups, respectively, were identified as white. The macular vessel density of the superficial capillary plexus was lower in the amblyopic group than in the control group in both 3 × 3-mm and 6 × 6-mm scans. After adjusting for age and refractive error, the mean (SD) difference in the superficial capillary plexus in the 6 × 6-mm scan was statistically significant (49.3% [4.1] vs 51.2% [2.9]; P  = .02). Macular vessel density of the deep capillary plexus in the 6 × 6-mm scans was also considerably different between groups: mean (SD) vessel density of the deep retinal capillary plexus was 54.4% (4.7%) in the amblyopia group and 60.1% (3.3%) in the control group, with a difference of 5.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-8.1%; P  = .002). Conclusions and Relevance The study found that OCTA reveals subnormal superficial and deep retinal capillary density in the macula of patients with amblyopia. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance of this finding.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at 15 years of age of a randomized clinical trial.

              Initial treatment for amblyopia of the fellow eye with patching and atropine sulfate eyedrops improves visual acuity. Long-term data on the durability of treatment benefit are needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Integr Med Res
                Integr Med Res
                Integrative Medicine Research
                Elsevier
                2213-4220
                2213-4239
                30 May 2020
                December 2020
                30 May 2020
                : 9
                : 4
                : 100435
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Ophthalmology & Otolaryngology & Dermatology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [b ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [c ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [d ]Kimjoongho Korean Medical Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Ophthalmology & Otolaryngology & Dermatology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. inhwajun@ 123456khnmc.or.kr
                Article
                S2213-4220(20)30067-6 100435
                10.1016/j.imr.2020.100435
                7393411
                f1cdcba0-95fe-4f48-b3c6-d62e9899840e
                © 2020 Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 April 2020
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article