15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    recommends
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences in optimality index between planned place of birth in a birth centre and alternative planned places of birth, a nationwide prospective cohort study in The Netherlands: results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To compare the Optimality Index of planned birth in a birth centre with planned birth in a hospital and planned home birth for low-risk term pregnant women who start labour under the responsibility of a community midwife.

          Design

          Prospective cohort study.

          Setting

          Low-risk pregnant women under care of a community midwife and living in a region with one of the 21 participating Dutch birth centres or in a region with the possibility for midwife-led hospital birth. Home birth was commonly available in all regions included in the study.

          Participants

          3455 low-risk term pregnant women (1686 nulliparous and 1769 multiparous) who gave birth between 1 July 2013 and 31 December 2013: 1668 planned birth centre births, 701 planned midwife-led hospital births and 1086 planned home births.

          Main outcome measurements

          The Optimality IndexNL-2015, a tool to measure ‘maximum outcome with minimal intervention’, was assessed by planned place of birth being a birth centre, a hospital setting or at home. Also, a composite maternal and perinatal adverse outcome score was calculated for the different planned places of birth.

          Results

          There were no differences in Optimality Index NL-2015 for pregnant women who planned to give birth in a birth centre compared with women who planned to give birth in a hospital. Although effect sizes were small, women who planned to give birth at home had a higher Optimality Index NL-2015 than women who planned to give birth in a birth centre. The differences were larger for multiparous than for nulliparous women.

          Conclusion

          The Optimality Index NL-2015 for women with planned birth centre births was comparable with planned midwife-led hospital births. Women with planned home births had a higher Optimality Index NL-2015, that is, a higher sum score of evidence-based items with an optimal value than women with planned birth centre births.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study

          Introduction Building integrated services in a primary care setting is considered an essential important strategy for establishing a high-quality and affordable health care system. The theoretical foundations of such integrated service models are described by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, which distinguishes six integration dimensions (clinical, professional, organisational, system, functional and normative integration). The aim of the present study is to refine the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care by developing a taxonomy that specifies the underlying key features of the six dimensions. Methods First, a literature review was conducted to identify features for achieving integrated service delivery. Second, a thematic analysis method was used to develop a taxonomy of key features organised into the dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Finally, the appropriateness of the key features was tested in a Delphi study among Dutch experts. Results The taxonomy consists of 59 key features distributed across the six integration dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Key features associated with the clinical, professional, organisational and normative dimensions were considered appropriate by the experts. Key features linked to the functional and system dimensions were considered less appropriate. Discussion This study contributes to the ongoing debate of defining the concept and typology of integrated care. This taxonomy provides a development agenda for establishing an accepted scientific framework of integrated care from an end-user, professional, managerial and policy perspective.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in The Netherlands.

            To investigate the relation between the intended place of birth (home or hospital) and perinatal outcome in women with low risk pregnancies after controlling for parity and social, medical, and obstetric background. Analysis of prospective data from midwives and their clients. 54 midwifery practices in the province of Gelderland, Netherlands. 97 midwives and 1836 women with low risk pregnancies who had planned to give birth at home or in hospital. Perinatal outcome index based on "maximal result with minimal intervention" and incorporating 22 items on childbirth, 9 on the condition of the newborn, and 5 on the mother after the birth. There was no relation between the planned place of birth and perinatal outcome in primiparous women when controlling for a favourable or less favourable background. In multiparous women, perinatal outcome was significantly better for planned home births than for planned hospital births, with or without control for background variables. The outcome of planned home births is at least as good as that of planned hospital births in women at low risk receiving midwifery care in the Netherlands.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Persisting rise in referrals during labor in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands.

              There are concerns about the Dutch maternity care system, characterized by a strict role division between primary and secondary care. The objective of this study was to describe trends in referrals and in perinatal outcomes among labors that started in primary midwife-led care. We performed a descriptive study of all 789,795 labors that started in primary midwife-led care during 2000 to 2008 in The Netherlands. Referrals to obstetrician-led care or pediatrician were classified as urgent or nonurgent. Perinatal safety was described by perinatal mortality (intrapartum or neonatal 0-7 days), admission to neonatal intensive care unit 0-7 days, and Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes. The proportion of referrals during labor or after birth declined from 52.6 to 42.6 percent for nulliparous women and from 83.2 to 76.7 percent for multiparous women. Especially nonurgent referrals during the first stage increased, for nulliparous women from 28.7 to 40.7 percent and for multiparous women from 10.5 to 16.5 percent. Referrals were less frequent in planned home births. Perinatal mortality was 0.9 per thousand births for nulliparous women, and 0.6 per thousand for multiparous women. A low Apgar score was registered in 8.6 per thousand births for nulliparous women, and 4.1 per thousand for multiparous women. There was a considerable rise in nonurgent referrals to obstetrician-led care in primary midwife-led care during labor. Perinatal safety did not improve significantly over time. The persisting rise in referrals challenges the sustainability of the current strict role division between primary and secondary maternity care in The Netherlands. © 2013, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2017
                16 November 2017
                : 7
                : 11
                : e016958
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Child Health , TNO (Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research) , Leiden, The Netherlands
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Obstetrics , Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum , Leiden, The Netherlands
                [3 ] departmentMidwifery Practice Verloskundigen Oosterhout , Werkmansbeemd , Oosterhout, the Netherlands
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Erasmus MC university Medical Centre Rotterdam , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ] Jan van Es Instituut , Almere, Flevoland, The Netherlands
                [6 ] departmentDepartment of Medical Decision Making , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden, The Netherlands
                [7 ] departmentDepartment of Life Style , TNO (NetherlandsOrganisation for Applied Scientific Research) , Leiden, The Netherlands
                [8 ] departmentDivision of Woman and Baby , University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [9 ] NIVEL(Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) , Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Marieke A A Hermus; maaklapwijk@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                bmjopen-2017-016958
                10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016958
                5701986
                29150465
                f1e378e8-d4f9-408e-98a3-7d09e21c6f4f
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 27 March 2017
                : 02 October 2017
                : 04 October 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001826, ZonMw;
                Categories
                Obstetrics and Gynaecology
                Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                midwifery,midwife-led units,delivery rooms,outcome assessment (health care),the netherlands,birthing centres

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content95

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors614