0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Altered Kinetics of Pituitary Response to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Women with Variant Luteinizing Hormone: Correlation with Ovulatory Disorders

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: The LH response of pituitary gland to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation is not well defined in patients with mutant β-subunit (Trp<sup>8</sup> to Arg<sup>8</sup> and Ile<sup>15</sup> to Thr<sup>15</sup>). Here we compared the relative activities and dynamics of LH secretion in patients with wild-type and variant LH following injection of GnRH. Methods: A GnRH stimulation test was performed in 33 patients with ovulatory disorders (patient group) and 29 women with normal ovulatory cycles (control group) heterozygous for the variant LHβ allele. Blood samples were obtained up to 120 min after GnRH injection. Serum LH response was determined by comparing the results of LH immunoassays using a monoclonal antibody that recognizes wild-type LH only with those of another assay using a polyclonal antibody that recognizes equally both variant and wild-type LH (total LH). The ratio of variant LH to total LH (LH ratio) was used to determine the serum LH status. Results: The LH ratio in the control group showed the peak 15 min after GnRH injection, while that in the patient group showed the peaks 30–60 min after injection. The LH ratio in the patient group at 120 min after injection was significantly lower than that in the control group. The percent increases in LH ratio in both groups showed the peak 15 min after injection. The patient group had significantly lower changes of LH ratio at 15, 60, 90 and 120 min after GnRH injection compared with that in the control group. Conclusion: Differences in circulatory kinetics of the two types of LH may explain the differences in LH function between patients with ovulatory disorders and women with normal ovulatory cycles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Identification of two point mutations in the gene coding luteinizing hormone (LH) beta-subunit, associated with immunologically anomalous LH variants

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Occurrence and biological properties of a common genetic variant of luteinizing hormone

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The role of luteinizing hormone-beta gene polymorphism in the onset and progression of puberty in healthy boys

               T Raivio (1996)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRE
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                2004
                March 2004
                02 March 2004
                : 61
                : 1
                : 27-32
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and bCentral Clinical Laboratory, Shimane Medical University, Izumo, Japan
                Article
                75194 Horm Res 2004;61:27–32
                10.1159/000075194
                14646399
                © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 4, References: 28, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Comments

                Comment on this article