9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Role of modern imaging techniques for the in vivo diagnosis of lichen planus

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that can sometimes affect mucosal surfaces, with unknown pathogenesis, even though it appears to be an autoimmune disease. The diagnosis of lichen planus is usually based on histopathological examination of the lesions. Nowadays, the classical invasive diagnostic methods are replaced by modern non-invasive techniques. In this review, we present the main non-invasive imaging methods (dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography, ultrasound and diffuse reflection spectrophotometry) used in the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of lichen planus. Dermoscopy is a non-invasive method initially used for diagnosis of pigmented tumors but now is used also for inflammatory and infectious skin diseases. In lichen planus, the dermoscopy increases the accuracy of diagnosis, avoids skin biopsies commonly used and can be useful in the therapeutic monitoring by repeated investigation at different stages of treatment. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a novel non-invasive imaging technique that is prevalently used for the diagnosis of skin tumors and inflammatory skin diseases. This technology has been mostly employed for bedside, real-time microscopic evaluation of psoriasis, lichen planus, contact dermatitis, revealing specific confocal features to support clinical diagnosis and assist with patient management. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an emergent imaging technique, developed over the last decade, based on the interaction of the infrared radiation (900–1,500 nm) and the living tissues. A limited information exists on the benefits of OCT technology for the in vivo diagnosis of LP but could be a useful auxiliary tool in the in vivo differential diagnosis, especially in clinical equivocal settings like mucosal lesions, and in monitoring the response to treatment. Our review shows the possibility of using modern imaging techniques for the in vivo diagnosis and also for evaluation of the treatment response.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Exp Ther Med
          Exp Ther Med
          ETM
          Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
          D.A. Spandidos
          1792-0981
          1792-1015
          February 2019
          16 November 2018
          16 November 2018
          : 17
          : 2
          : 1052-1060
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Emergency County Hospital, 200349 Craiova, Romania
          [2 ]Department of Dermatology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Elias Emergency University Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
          [3 ]Department of Biochemistry, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
          [4 ]Dermatology Research Laboratory, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
          [5 ]Department of Pathology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
          [6 ]Department of Pathology, ‘Colentina’ University Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
          [7 ]Carol Medical Center, 010626 Bucharest, Romania
          [8 ]Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Military Hospital, 200349 Craiova, Romania
          [9 ]Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Emergency County Hospital, 200349 Craiova, Romania
          [10 ]Department of Physiology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
          [11 ]Department of Dermatology, ‘Prof. N. Paulescu’ National Institute of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, 011233 Bucharest, Romania
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Dr Daniel Boda, Dermatology Research Laboratory, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Eroii Sanitari Avenue, 050474 Bucharest, Romania, E-mail: daniel.boda@ 123456yahoo.com
          Article
          ETM-0-0-6974
          10.3892/etm.2018.6974
          6327670
          30679973
          f1f0ea2f-4098-4a55-b591-450527a321ce
          Copyright: © Ianoși et al.

          This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

          History
          : 03 July 2018
          : 21 August 2018
          Categories
          Review

          Medicine
          lichen planus,dermoscopy,reflectance confocal microscopy,opticalcoherence tomography,diffuse reflection spectrophotometry,ultrasound

          Comments

          Comment on this article