4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Effect of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on One- and Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction and on Autologous Reconstruction: A Multicenter Italian Study among 18 Senonetwork Breast Centres

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 1 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 17 , 18 , 18 , 19 , 19 , 20 , 20 , 21 , 21 , 22 , 22 , 23 , 23 , 24 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 6 , 7 , 1
      The Breast Journal
      Hindawi

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          In modern breast cancer treatment, a growing role has been observed for breast reconstruction together with an increase in clinical indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Choosing the optimum type of reconstructive technique is a clinical challenge. We therefore conducted a national multicenter study to analyze the impact of PMRT on breast reconstruction.

          Methods

          We conducted a retrospective case-control multicenter study on women undergoing breast reconstruction. Data were collected from 18 Italian Breast Centres and stored in a cumulative database which included the following: autologous reconstruction, direct-to-implant (DTI), and tissue expander/immediate (TE/I). For all patients, we described complications and surgical endpoints to complications such as reconstruction failure, explant, change in type of reconstruction, and reintervention.

          Results

          From 2001 to April 2020, 3116 patients were evaluated. The risk for any complication was significantly increased in patients receiving PMRT (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.33–2.24; p < 0.001). PMRT was associated with a significant increase in the risk of capsular contracture in the DTI and TE/I groups (aOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.57–3.20; p < 0.001). Comparing type of procedures, the risk of failure (aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.06–3.12, p=0.030), explant (aOR, 3.34; 95% CI, 3.85–7.83, p < 0.001), and severe complications (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.88–3.43, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group undergoing DTI reconstruction as compared to TE/I reconstruction.

          Conclusion

          Our study confirms that autologous reconstruction is the procedure least impacted by PMRT, while DTI appears to be the most impacted by PMRT, when compared with TE/I which shows a lower rate of explant and reconstruction failure. The trial is registered with NCT04783818, and the date of registration is 1 March, 2021, retrospectively registered.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction.

          The aim of this study was to assess and compare the psychological outcome and satisfaction of patients whom underwent wide local excision, mastectomy alone and mastectomy with breast reconstruction. A total of 577 patients had different types of operations for primary breast cancer (254 (44%) had wide local excision, 202 (35%) had simple mastectomy and 121 (21%) had breast reconstruction). Psychosocial morbidity and satisfaction were studied retrospectively using self-evaluation questionnaires. The three different surgical groups were cross-matched into four different age group. Significant statistical differences existed between the three procedures regarding satisfaction and psychosocial morbidity (anxiety, depression, body image, sexuality and self-esteem) in favour of wide local excision followed by breast reconstruction. Greatest morbidity was seen in the mastectomy group. Patient satisfaction of cosmetic outcome and psychosocial aspects was greater with wide local excision than with breast reconstruction or mastectomy. However, since wide local excision is indicated in only a group of patients, breast reconstruction should be an option available to patients requiring mastectomy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2021 : Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines

            The NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer include up-to-date guidelines for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, male breast cancer, and breast cancer during pregnancy. These guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions with breast cancer–focused expertise in the fields of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, reconstructive surgery, and patient advocacy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the most recent updates to recommendations for adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with nonmetastatic, early-stage, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction

              Background Patients considering postmastectomy radiation and reconstruction require information regarding expected outcomes to make preference-concordant decisions. Methods A prospective multicenter cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer at 11 centers between 2012 and 2015 compared complications and patient-reported outcomes of 622 irradiated and 1625 unirradiated patients who received reconstruction. Patient characteristics and outcomes between irradiated and unirradiated patients were analyzed using t tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Multivariable mixed-effects regression modelsassessed the impact of reconstruction type and radiotherapy on outcomes after adjusting for relevant covariates. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Autologous reconstruction was more commonly received by irradiated patients (37.9% vs 25.0%, P < .001). Immediate reconstruction was less common in irradiated patients (83.0% vs 95.7%, P < .001). At least one breast complication had occurred by two years in 38.9% of irradiated patients with implant reconstruction, 25.6% of irradiated patients with autologous reconstruction, 21.8% of unirradiated patients with implant reconstruction, and 28.3% of unirradiated patients with autologous reconstruction. Multivariable analysis showed bilateral treatment and higher body mass index to be predictive of developing a complication, with a statistically significant interaction between radiotherapy receipt and reconstruction type. Among irradiated patients, autologous reconstruction was associated with a lower risk of complications than implant-based reconstruction at two years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27 to 0.82, P = .007); no between-procedure difference was found in unirradiated patients. The interaction was also statistically significant for satisfaction with breasts at two years ( P = .002), with larger adjusted difference in satisfaction between autologous vs implant approaches (63.5, 95% CI = 55.9 to 71.1, vs 47.7, 95% CI = 40.2 to 55.2, respectively) in irradiated patients than between autologous vs implant approaches (67.6, 95% CI = 60.3 to 74.9, vs 60.5, 95% CI = 53.6 to 67.4) in unirradiated patients. Conclusions Autologous reconstruction appears to yield superior patient-reported satisfaction and lower risk of complications than implant-based approaches among patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Breast J
                Breast J
                TBJ
                The Breast Journal
                Hindawi
                1075-122X
                1524-4741
                2023
                9 May 2023
                : 2023
                : 6688466
                Affiliations
                1Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA-Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Milan, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
                2Department of Plastic Surgery, Director of the Residency Program of Plastic Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
                3Department of Radiotherapy, Fondazione Poliambulanza “Guido Berlucchi” Hospital, Brescia, Italy
                4Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
                5Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
                6Department of Biomedical Sciences, IRCCS Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
                7IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
                8Laboratory of Molecular Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
                9Department of Plastic Surgery, UCO, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
                10IRCCS Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy
                11Breast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
                12Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
                13Division of Senology, Department of Oncology and Oncohematology, IEO, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
                14Division of Radiotherapy, IEO, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
                15Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IEO, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
                16Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
                17Department of Plastic Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy
                18Campus BioMedico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
                19Department of Plastic Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio, Modena, Italy
                20Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
                21Department of Breast Surgery and Integrated Senology Centre, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
                22Department of Breast Surgery, AULSS 3 Veneziana, Venice, Italy
                23Unit of Plastic Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
                24Department of Breast Surgery and Breast Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
                25Department of Plastic Surgery, Città Della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy
                26Department of Plastic Surgery, ASUGI Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
                27Functional Department Transmural Breast Surgery, AULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy
                28Department of Breast Surgery, AULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy
                29Department of Plastic Surgery, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
                30Department of Breast Surgery and Breast Unit, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
                31Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Sharad Goyal

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-5633
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0688-6634
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1428-7933
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6469-4086
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-6639
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9186-8400
                https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4768-4043
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4676-2775
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1321-760X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7272-3924
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3032-9494
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0320-559X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8926-4106
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-8328
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-7118
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0903-2418
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-6880
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6024-8647
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-8198
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-6060
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-5686
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6717-5767
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8587-9872
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-4759
                https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2011-3043
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6501-8648
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-6326
                https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8777-9474
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-2694
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4105-8252
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6638-9010
                https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6735-8723
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0723-1074
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-0068
                https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9074-6787
                https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5952-0879
                https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8338-3854
                https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7378-8431
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8252-5833
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-6639
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5234-6044
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8417-0186
                Article
                10.1155/2023/6688466
                10188256
                37205012
                f22ff9b4-b3c2-4e47-82da-f2754fd6463f
                Copyright © 2023 Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 November 2022
                : 7 April 2023
                : 15 April 2023
                Categories
                Research Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article