9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      2377. Outcomes in Patients With History of Cardiac or Vascular Disease (CV) During Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin And Skin Structure Infection (ABSSSI) With Delafloxacin (DLX) vs. Vancomycin/Aztreonam (VAN/AZ)

      abstract
      , MD 1 , , MD 2 , , BS 3 , , PhD 4 , , MD 3
      Open Forum Infectious Diseases
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          DLX, an anionic fluoroquinolone antibiotic with Gram-positive and Gram-negative activity, was recently approved for treatment of ABSSSI. Two global phase 3 ABSSSI trials (studies 302 and 303) included patients with cardiac or vascular disease.

          Methods

          Two multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy trials of adults with ABSSSI patients randomized 1:1 to receive either DLX monotherapy or VAN 15 mg/kg (actual body weight) with AZ for 5–14 days. Study 302 used DLX 300 mg BID IV only; study 303 used DLX 300 mg BID IV for 3 days with a mandatory blinded switch to DLX 450 mg oral BID. Key endpoints were objective response at 48–72 hours with ≥20% reduction in lesion size; and Investigator assessment of outcome based on resolution of signs and symptoms at Follow-up (FU day 14) and Late Follow-up (LFU day 21–28).

          Results

          In the two studies, 488 CV patients were randomized in United States, Europe, Latin America and Asia. 57% were male with mean age 59 years. Average erythema area at baseline was 446 cm 2. 58% had cellulitis, 19% abscesses, 22% wound and 1% burns. Key endpoints are given in the following table.

          DLX, n/Total (%) VAN/AZ, n/Total (%)
          Objective response 48–72h (ITT) 208/260 (80.0%) 183/228 (80.3%)
          Investigator-Assessed Success (FU CE) 204/217 (94.0%) 176/185 (95.1%)
          Investigator-Assessed Success (LFU CE) 194/207 (93.7%) 173/182 (95.1%)
          Micro Success (FU ME) for S. aureus 72/74 (97.3%) 57/61 (93.4%)

          The % of CV patients with at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE) was similar for DLX (22.7%) compared with VAN/AZ (22.4%). There were 2 DLX and 5 VAN/AZ-treated CV patients discontinued due to related AEs. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were gastrointestinal including diarrhea seen in 8.2% and 3.1% of DLX and VAN/AZ patients respectively, generally mild to moderate in nature with no cases of C. difficile diarrhea. There were no cardiac events or deaths attributed to either study drug.

          Conclusion

          In CV patients, fixed dose DLX monotherapy was comparable to VAN/AZ in treatment of ABSSSI based on the early objective and investigator assessed responses at FU and LFU. DLX was also comparable to VAN/AZ in treating patients with S. aureus. There were no cardiac events or deaths in either study group. DLX appears effective and well tolerated in CV patients with ABSSSI.

          Disclosures

          G. Oguchi, Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.: Investigator, Research support. R. Beasley, Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.: Investigator, Research support. L. Lawrence, Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. C. Tseng, Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultant and Research Contractor, Consulting fee. S. K. Cammarata, Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.: Employee, Salary.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2328-8957
          November 2018
          26 November 2018
          26 November 2018
          : 5
          : Suppl 1 , ID Week 2018 Abstracts
          : S708
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Midland Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC, Deland, Florida
          [2 ]Health Concepts, Rapid City, South Dakota
          [3 ]Melinta Therapeutics, Inc., New Haven, Connecticut
          [4 ]Firma Clinical, Hunt Valley, Maryland
          Article
          ofy210.2030
          10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2030
          6254169
          f23086f2-999f-4fc6-ab06-7b6337263bc1
          © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 1
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Poster Abstracts

          Comments

          Comment on this article