A new validation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for depression

Ramos-Brieva, J.A.; Cordero-Villafafila, A.

doi:10.1016/0022-3956(88)90024-6

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

A new validation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for depression

Author(s): J.A. Ramos-Brieva , A. Cordero-Villafafila

Publication date Created: January 1988

Publication date (Print): January 1988

Journal: Journal of Psychiatric Research

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PubMed

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Most cited references 8

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

Lee Cronbach (1951)

Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334

0 comments Cited 6127 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

A comparison of depression rating scales.

S. M Shaw, K G McGuigan, R Snaith … (1982)

In a comparison of assessment methods of severity of depressive illness, the Montgomery-Asberg Scale had, broadly, a performance equal to the Hamilton Scale. The Beck Depression Inventory, it subscale, and the Wakefield Inventory all had overall poor performances and should now be abandoned in research. The two-patient-rated scales were, overall, similar and fairly satisfactory measures. The comparisons were at points in severity of illness and not on change of severity.