15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Review of Explicit and Implicit Assumptions When Providing Personalized Feedback Based on Self-Report EMA Data

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in which participants report on their moment-to-moment experiences in their natural environment, is a hot topic. An emerging field in clinical psychology based on either EMA, or what we term Ecological Retrospective Assessment (ERA) as it requires retrospectivity, is the field of personalized feedback. In this field, EMA/ERA-data-driven summaries are presented to participants with the goal of promoting their insight in their experiences. Underlying this procedure are some fundamental assumptions about (i) the relation between true moment-to-moment experiences and retrospective evaluations of those experiences, (ii) the translation of these experiences and evaluations to different types of data, (iii) the comparison of these different types of data, and (iv) the impact of a summary of moment-to-moment experiences on retrospective evaluations of those experiences. We argue that these assumptions deserve further exploration, in order to create a strong evidence-based foundation for the personalized feedback procedure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

          While considerable attention has focused on improving the detection of depression, assessment of severity is also important in guiding treatment decisions. Therefore, we examined the validity of a brief, new measure of depression severity. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). The PHQ-9 was completed by 6,000 patients in 8 primary care clinics and 7 obstetrics-gynecology clinics. Construct validity was assessed using the 20-item Short-Form General Health Survey, self-reported sick days and clinic visits, and symptom-related difficulty. Criterion validity was assessed against an independent structured mental health professional (MHP) interview in a sample of 580 patients. As PHQ-9 depression severity increased, there was a substantial decrease in functional status on all 6 SF-20 subscales. Also, symptom-related difficulty, sick days, and health care utilization increased. Using the MHP reinterview as the criterion standard, a PHQ-9 score > or =10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represented mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively. Results were similar in the primary care and obstetrics-gynecology samples. In addition to making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive disorders, the PHQ-9 is also a reliable and valid measure of depression severity. These characteristics plus its brevity make the PHQ-9 a useful clinical and research tool.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

            L Radloff (1977)
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                08 December 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 764526
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University , Tilburg, Netherlands
                [2] 2Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University , Utrecht, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Eleni Petkari, Universidad Internacional De La Rioja, Spain

                Reviewed by: Hiroe Kikuchi, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Japan; Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain

                *Correspondence: IJsbrand Leertouwer, i.leertouwer@ 123456uvt.nl

                This article was submitted to Psychology for Clinical Settings, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2021.764526
                8693716
                34955984
                f25773e2-f54e-42c3-9e7f-8dc2c12d784b
                Copyright © 2021 Leertouwer, Cramer, Vermunt and Schuurman.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 August 2021
                : 15 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 14, References: 100, Pages: 19, Words: 18920
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                ecological momentary assessment,retrospective assessment,personalized feedback,insight,intervention,experiencing self,remembering self

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log