27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Epilepsy surgery: Recommendations for India

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The following article recommends guidelines for epilepsy surgery for India. This article reviews the indications, the various surgical options available and the outcome of surgery for drug resistant epilepsy based on current evidence. Epilepsy surgery is a well-established option for patients who have been diagnosed to have drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) (on at least two appropriate, adequate anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) (either in monotherapy or in combination) with continuing seizures), where the presurgical work-up has shown concordance of structural imaging (magnetic resonance imaging) and electrical mapping data (electroencephalography (EEG), video EEG). There may be a requirement of functional imaging techniques in a certain number of DRE like positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission tomography, (SPECT)). Invasive monitoring should be restricted to a few when all noninvasive investigations are inconclusive, there is a dual pathology or there is a discordance of noninvasive data. The types of surgery could be curative (resective surgeries: amygdalo hippocampectomy, lesionectomy and multilobar resections; functional surgeries: hemispherotomy) and palliative (multiple subpial transaction, corpus callosotomy, vagal nerve stimulation). Epilepsy surgery in indicated cases has a success range from 50 to 86% in achieving seizure freedom as compared with <5% success rate with AEDs only in persons with DRE. Centers performing surgery should be categorized into Level I and Level II.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Surgery for seizures.

          J. Engel (1996)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Standard magnetic resonance imaging is inadequate for patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

            Patients with intractable epilepsy may benefit from epilepsy surgery especially if they have a radiologically demonstrable cerebral lesion. Dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols as performed at epilepsy surgery centres can detect epileptogenic abnormalities with great sensitivity and specificity. However, many patients with epilepsy are investigated with standard MRI sequences by radiologist outside epilepsy centres ("non-experts"). This study was undertaken to compare standard MRI and epilepsy specific MRI findings in patients with focal epilepsy. Comparison of results of standard MRI reported by "non-expert" radiologists, standard MRI evaluated by epilepsy "expert" radiologists, and epilepsy specific MRI read by "expert" radiologists in 123 consecutive patients undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation between 1996 and 1999. Validation of radiological findings by correlation with postoperative histological examination. Sensitivity of "non-expert" reports of standard MRI reports for focal lesions was 39%, of "expert" reports of standard MRI 50%, and of epilepsy dedicated MRI 91%. Dedicated MRI showed focal lesions in 85% of patients with "non-lesional" standard MRI. The technical quality of standard MRI improved during the study period, but "non-expert" reporting did not. In particular, hippocampal sclerosis was missed in 86% of cases. Neuropathological diagnoses (n=90) were predicted correctly in 22% of "non-expert" standard MRI reports but by 89% of dedicated MRI reports. Standard MRI failed to detect 57% of focal epileptogenic lesions. Patients without MRI lesion are less likely to be considered candidates for epilepsy surgery. Patients with refractory epilepsy should be referred to an MRI unit with epileptological experience at an early point.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              FDG-PET/MRI coregistration and diffusion-tensor imaging distinguish epileptogenic tubers and cortex in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: a preliminary report.

              Patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) are potential surgical candidates if the epileptogenic region(s) can be accurately identified. This retrospective study determined whether FDG-PET/MRI coregistration and diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) showed better accuracy in the localization of epileptogenic cortex than structural MRI in TSC patients. FDG-PET/MRI coregistration and/or DTI for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were utilized in 15 TSC patients. Presurgery scalp EEG and postsurgery seizure control identified epileptogenic tubers (n = 27) and these were compared with nonepileptogenic tubers (n = 204) for MRI tuber volume, volume of FDG-PET hypometabolism on MRI coregistration, DTI, ADC, and FA values. Compared with nonepileptogenic tubers, epileptogenic regions had increased volume of FDG-PET hypometabolism (p < 0.0001), and increased ADC values in subtuber white matter (p < 0.0001). In contrast, the largest MRI identified tuber (p = 0.046) and decreased FA values (p = 0.58) were less accurate in identifying epileptogenic regions. Larger volumes of FDG-PET hypometabolism correlated positively with increased ADC values (p = 0.029), and localized to areas of cortical dysplasia adjacent to the tuber in four cases. Larger volumes of FDG-PET hypometabolism relative to MRI tuber size and higher ADC values identified epileptogenic tubers and adjoining cortex containing cortical dysplasia in TSC patients with improved accuracy compared with largest tuber by MRI or lowest FA values. Used in conjunction with ictal scalp EEG and interictal magnetoencephalography, these newer neuroimaging techniques should improve the noninvasive evaluation of TSC patients with intractable epilepsy in distinguishing epileptogenic sites for surgical resection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Indian Acad Neurol
                AIAN
                Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
                Medknow Publications (India )
                0972-2327
                1998-3549
                Apr-Jun 2010
                : 13
                : 2
                : 87-93
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurosurgery New Delhi-110 029, India
                [1 ]Neurology, AIIMS, New Delhi-110 029, India
                Author notes
                For correspondence: Dr. P. Sarat Chandra, Neurosurgeon and Chief Epilepsy Surgeon, Room 607, 6 th floor, CN Center, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 100 29, India. E-mail: saratpchandra@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                AIAN-13-87
                10.4103/0972-2327.64625
                2924525
                20814490
                f26b2dfa-1db7-42b2-80f1-cbb037758f64
                © Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 July 2009
                : 16 July 2009
                : 06 November 2009
                Categories
                Review: Management Updates (Reviews on advances in treatment)

                Neurology
                level i,resective surgery,level ii,hemispherotomy,multiple subpial transactions,lesionectomy,epilepsy surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article