19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of Protocolized Sedation on Clinical Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

      research-article
      , MPH, , MD, MPH, , MD, MPH, , MD, , MD, MS, MPH
      Mayo Clinic proceedings

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          To assess the effects of protocolized sedation (algorithm or daily interruption) compared with usual care without protocolized sedation on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

          Methods:

          We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to February 28, 2013. A random-effects model was used to synthesize risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs).

          Results:

          Of 4782 records screened, 6 RCTs including 1243 patients met the inclusion criteria. Protocolized sedation was associated with significant reductions in overall mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97; P=.02; number needed to treat, 20; P=.11), ICU length of stay (WMD, −1.73 days; 95% CI, −3.32 to −0.14 days; P=.03), hospital length of stay (WMD, −3.55 days; 95% CI, −5.98 to −1.12 days; P=.004), and tracheostomy (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.96; P=.03; number needed to treat, 16.6; P=.04; 5 RCTs) compared with usual care. Protocolized sedation produced no significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD, −1.04 days; 95% CI, −2.54 to 0.47 days; P=.18), reintubation (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.15; P=.21; 3 RCTs), and self-extubation (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.46 to 4.82; P=.51; 4 RCTs) compared with usual care. Included studies did not report delirium incidence.

          Conclusion:

          In mechanically ventilated adults in closed, nonspecialty ICUs, protocolized sedation seems to decrease overall mortality (15%), ICU and hospital lengths of stay (1.73 and 3.55 days, respectively), and tracheostomy (31%) compared with usual care without protocolized sedation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0405543
          5565
          Mayo Clin Proc
          Mayo Clin. Proc.
          Mayo Clinic proceedings
          0025-6196
          1942-5546
          14 March 2019
          09 April 2015
          May 2015
          17 April 2019
          : 90
          : 5
          : 613-623
          Affiliations
          From The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH (M.A.M., A.G.V., A.K.); Department of Critical Care, Newport Hospital, Newport, RI (A.G.V.); Department of Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA (A.K.); Department of Medicine—Section of Critical Care, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH (A.G.V., P.D.S.); and Division of Pulmonary—Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (L.A.C.).
          Author notes
          Correspondence: Address to Mahad A. Minhas, MPH, 8132 York Ave S, Bloomington, MN 55431 ( mahadminhas@ 123456gmail.com ).
          Article
          PMC6469349 PMC6469349 6469349 nihpa1008827
          10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.02.016
          6469349
          25865475
          f28895b0-4258-49e7-87f1-f472f5f26285
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article