22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Predictive Value of Pretransplant Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Bone Marrow Evaluations for Outcomes

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">We examined the predictive value of pretransplant positron emission tomography/computed tomography and marrow involvement evaluation on outcomes of 66 patients with mantle cell lymphoma treated with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Residual disease detected by either method prior to autograft was associated with increased relapse rates at 2 years and worse 5-year disease-free survival. Allograft recipients had favorable long-term outcomes despite the presence of residual disease pre-HCT. </p><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9233042e161">Background</h5> <p id="P2">The prognostic roles of 18F-fludeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging and marrow involvement evaluation on outcomes following autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are uncertain and require more data. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9233042e166">Patients and Methods</h5> <p id="P3">We categorized 66 patients with MCL who received HCT (38 autologous and 28 allogeneic) on the basis of pre-HCT residual disease (RD) status as assessed by marrow MCL morphology and flow/molecular analysis and PET/CT imaging to RD positive (RD <sup>+</sup>) (either or both measures positive) and RD <sup>−</sup> (both negative). We analyzed the predictive value of these RD detection methods on transplant outcomes. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9233042e177">Results</h5> <p id="P4">The 2-year relapse rate after autograft was significantly higher in pre-HCT RD <sup>+</sup> patients (46% [95% CI 16–77%]) than in patients who were RD <sup>−</sup> (19% [95% CI 0–42%]; <i>P</i> = .02), leading to worse 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) in RD <sup>+</sup> patients (46% [95% CI 14%–73%] vs. 68% [95% CI 33–87%], <i>P</i> = .04). In multivariate analysis, RD <sup>+</sup> status was associated with a reduction in DFS (hazard ratio, 5.6; <i>P</i> = .02). Most allogeneic HCT recipients had advanced disease and most were RD <sup>+</sup> (12 PET/CT <sup>+</sup>; 5 marrow-positive). The 5-year DFS and relapse rates after allogeneic HCT were 34% and 25% for all patients and 40% and 33% for RD <sup>+</sup> recipients, suggesting that active disease at the time of allograft does not preclude long-term remissions in advanced MCL. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9233042e213">Conclusion</h5> <p id="P5">Both autologous and allogeneic HCT lead to promising long-term survival. RD detected prior to autograft was associated with increased relapse and worse 5 year DFS. Allograft recipients had favorable long-term outcomes even in presence of pre-HCT detectable disease. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia
          Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia
          Elsevier BV
          21522650
          April 2014
          April 2014
          : 14
          : 2
          : 114-121
          Article
          10.1016/j.clml.2013.10.007
          5549948
          24388482
          f2921ace-b81e-45eb-8c91-9ea0395b14a2
          © 2014

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article