12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Development of a recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA-EXO) and lateral flow assay (RPA-LFA) based on the ITS1 gene for the detection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in gastropod intermediate hosts

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Angiostrongylus cantonensis is a parasitic nematode known to infect humans through the ingestion of third stage larvae which can cause inflammation and damage to the central nervous system. Currently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is one of the most reliable diagnostic methods for detecting A. cantonensis in humans as well as in gastropod hosts, but requires expensive and specialized equipment. Here, we compare the sensitivity and accuracy of a recombinase polymerase amplification Exo (RPA-EXO) assay, and a recombinase polymerase amplification lateral flow assay (RPA-LFA) with a traditional quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay currently available. The three assays were used to test 35 slugs from Hawai‘i for the presence of A. cantonensis DNA. Consistent results among the three tests were shown in 23/35 samples (65.7%), while 7/35 (20%) were discordant in low infection level samples (<0.01 larvae per mg tissue), and 5/35 (14.3%) were equivocal. To evaluate sensitivity, a partial ITS1 gene was cloned, and serial plasmid dilutions were created ranging from 100 copies μL −1 to ~1 copy μL −1. All three assays consistently detected 50–100 copies μL −1 in triplicate and qPCR was able to detect ~13 copies μL −1 in triplicate. RPA-EXO was able to detect 25 copies μL −1 in triplicate and RPA-LFA was not able to amplify consistently below 50 copies μL −1. Thus, our RPA-EXO and RPA-LFA assays do not appear as sensitive as the current qPCR assay at low DNA concentrations; however, these tests have numerous advantages that may make them useful alternatives to qPCR.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lateral flow assays

          Lateral flow assays (LFAs) are the technology behind low-cost, simple, rapid and portable detection devices popular in biomedicine, agriculture, food and environmental sciences. This review presents an overview of the principle of the method and the critical components of the assay, focusing on lateral flow immunoassays. This type of assay has recently attracted considerable interest because of its potential to provide instantaneous diagnosis directly to patients. The range and interpretation of results and parameters used for evaluation of the assay will also be discussed. The main advantages and disadvantages of LFAs will be summarized and relevant future improvements to testing devices and strategies will be proposed. Finally, the major recent advances and future diagnostic applications in the LFA field will be explored.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Parasitic infections of man and animals in Hawaii

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of a user-friendly test device (AcQuickDx) for detection of specific antibodies to human angiostrongyliasis

              Eamsobhana (2019)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Parasitology
                Parasitology
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0031-1820
                1469-8161
                February 2021
                November 04 2020
                February 2021
                : 148
                : 2
                : 251-258
                Article
                10.1017/S0031182020002139
                f29cda5c-bc28-4ceb-aee9-0b4ea624eb8e
                © 2021

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article