7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nightly Biting Cycles of Anopheles Species in Rural Northwestern Burkina Faso

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The biting behavior of anophelines is an important determinant of malaria transmission. Understanding the local vector host-seeking behavior, its outdoor/ indoor biting preference, and nocturnal biting periods is essential for effectively applying and improving vector control methods, such as Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) and personal protective measures. To better understand the biting and host-seeking patterns of Anopheles mosquitoes in Northwestern Burkina Faso, we performed biweekly Human Landing Catches (HLC) in six villages during the period of highest mosquito abundance and malaria transmission. We applied a negative binomial regression framework to statistically analyze the host-seeking activities of Anopheles species and test for differences across hours, months, and villages, as well as for differences between indoor and outdoor capture points. Anopheles gambiae s.l. was identified as the main malaria vector in this region, representing about 90% of the total anopheline population. Biting activity was significantly different across hours and showed a peaked plateau between 2000 and 0200 hours. Differences in the pattern of biting cycles were observed between the early and late rainy season. This study shows that anopheline biting activity in Northwest Burkina Faso is high throughout the night, at indoor and outdoor posts alike. Consequently, bed nets alone may not provide sufficient protection against early biting anophelines and should be complemented with additional strategies such as indoor residual spraying (IRS) and larval source management (LSM) to meet the WHO’s ambitious goals that are reflected in the global technical malaria strategy for 2030.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Increased proportions of outdoor feeding among residual malaria vector populations following increased use of insecticide-treated nets in rural Tanzania

          Background Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) represent the front-line tools for malaria vector control globally, but are optimally effective where the majority of baseline transmission occurs indoors. In the surveyed area of rural southern Tanzania, bed net use steadily increased over the last decade, reducing malaria transmission intensity by 94%. Methods Starting before bed nets were introduced (1997), and then after two milestones of net use had been reached-75% community-wide use of untreated nets (2004) and then 47% use of ITNs (2009)-hourly biting rates of malaria vectors from the Anopheles gambiae complex and Anopheles funestus group were surveyed. Results In 1997, An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus mosquitoes exhibited a tendency to bite humans inside houses late at night. For An. gambiae s.l., by 2009, nocturnal activity was less (p = 0.0018). At this time, the sibling species composition of the complex had shifted from predominantly An. gambiae s.s. to predominantly An. arabiensis. For An. funestus, by 2009, nocturnal activity was less (p = 0.0054) as well as the proportion biting indoors (p < 0.0001). At this time, An. funestus s.s. remained the predominant species within this group. As a consequence of these altered feeding patterns, the proportion (mean ± standard error) of human contact with mosquitoes (bites per person per night) occurring indoors dropped from 0.99 ± 0.002 in 1997 to 0.82 ± 0.008 in 2009 for the An. gambiae complex (p = 0.0143) and from 1.00 ± <0.001 to only 0.50 ± 0.048 for the An. funestus complex (p = 0.0004) over the same time period. Conclusions High usage of ITNs can dramatically alter African vector populations so that intense, predominantly indoor transmission is replaced by greatly lowered residual transmission, a greater proportion of which occurs outdoors. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, the residual, self-sustaining transmission will respond poorly to further insecticidal measures within houses. Additional vector control tools which target outdoor biting mosquitoes at the adult or immature stages are required to complement ITNs and IRS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in Africa, Europe and the Middle East: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis

            Background This is the second in a series of three articles documenting the geographical distribution of 41 dominant vector species (DVS) of human malaria. The first paper addressed the DVS of the Americas and the third will consider those of the Asian Pacific Region. Here, the DVS of Africa, Europe and the Middle East are discussed. The continent of Africa experiences the bulk of the global malaria burden due in part to the presence of the An. gambiae complex. Anopheles gambiae is one of four DVS within the An. gambiae complex, the others being An. arabiensis and the coastal An. merus and An. melas. There are a further three, highly anthropophilic DVS in Africa, An. funestus, An. moucheti and An. nili. Conversely, across Europe and the Middle East, malaria transmission is low and frequently absent, despite the presence of six DVS. To help control malaria in Africa and the Middle East, or to identify the risk of its re-emergence in Europe, the contemporary distribution and bionomics of the relevant DVS are needed. Results A contemporary database of occurrence data, compiled from the formal literature and other relevant resources, resulted in the collation of information for seven DVS from 44 countries in Africa containing 4234 geo-referenced, independent sites. In Europe and the Middle East, six DVS were identified from 2784 geo-referenced sites across 49 countries. These occurrence data were combined with expert opinion ranges and a suite of environmental and climatic variables of relevance to anopheline ecology to produce predictive distribution maps using the Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) method. Conclusions The predicted geographic extent for the following DVS (or species/suspected species complex*) is provided for Africa: Anopheles (Cellia) arabiensis, An. (Cel.) funestus*, An. (Cel.) gambiae, An. (Cel.) melas, An. (Cel.) merus, An. (Cel.) moucheti and An. (Cel.) nili*, and in the European and Middle Eastern Region: An. (Anopheles) atroparvus, An. (Ano.) labranchiae, An. (Ano.) messeae, An. (Ano.) sacharovi, An. (Cel.) sergentii and An. (Cel.) superpictus*. These maps are presented alongside a bionomics summary for each species relevant to its control.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Changes in Anopheles funestus biting behavior following universal coverage of long-lasting insecticidal nets in Benin.

              Behavioral modification of malaria vectors in response to vector control methods is of great concern. We investigated whether full coverage of long-lasting insecticide-treated mosquito nets (LLINs) may induce a switch in biting behavior in Anopheles funestus, a major malaria vector in Africa. Human-landing collections were conducted indoor and outdoor in 2 villages (Lokohouè and Tokoli) in Benin before and 1 year and 3 years after implementation of universal LLIN coverage. Proportion of outdoor biting (POB) and median catching times (MCT) were compared. The resistance of A. funestus to deltamethrin was monitored using bioassays. MCT of A. funestus switched from 2 AM in Lokohoué and 3 AM in Tokoli to 5 AM after 3 years (Mann-Whitney U test, P < .0001). In Tokoli, POB increased from 45% to 68.1% (odds ratio = 2.55; 95 confidence interval = 1.72-3.78; P < .0001) 1 year after the universal coverage, whereas POB was unchanged in Lokohoué. In Lokohoué, however, the proportion of A. funestus that bites after 6 am was 26%. Bioassays showed no resistance to deltamethrin. This study provides evidence for a switch in malaria vectors' biting behavior after the implementation of LLIN at universal coverage. These findings might have direct consequences for malaria control in Africa and highlighted the need for alternative strategies for better targeting malaria vectors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Med Entomol
                J. Med. Entomol
                jme
                Journal of Medical Entomology
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0022-2585
                1938-2928
                June 2018
                07 April 2018
                07 April 2018
                : 55
                : 4
                : 1027-1034
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld Heidelberg, Germany
                [2 ]Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
                [3 ]Centre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Nouna, Burkina Faso
                [4 ]Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
                [5 ]Institute for Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [6 ]German Mosquito Control Association (KABS), Speyer, Germany
                Author notes
                Corresponding author, e-mail: peter.dambach@ 123456web.de
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-6866
                Article
                tjy043
                10.1093/jme/tjy043
                6025195
                29635478
                f2c6b7f7-db94-4549-951d-817300b7cb27
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 01 October 2017
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: Universitaet Heidelberg 10.13039/501100001661
                Categories
                Vector-Borne Diseases, Surveillance, Prevention

                malaria,human landing catches,human bait catches,biting time,anopheles

                Comments

                Comment on this article