9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The LspC3–41I restriction-modification system is the major determinant for genetic manipulations of Lysinibacillus sphaericus C3–41

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Lysinibacillus sphaericus has been widely used in integrated mosquito control program and it is one of the minority bacterial species unable to metabolize carbohydrates. In consideration of the high genetic conservation at genomic level and difficulty of genetic horizontal transfer, it is hypothesized that effective restriction-modification (R-M) systems existed in mosquitocidal L. sphaericus.

          Results

          In this study, six type II R-M systems including LspC3–41I were predicted in L. sphaericus C3–41 genome. It was found that the cell free extracts (CFE) from this strain shown similar restriction and methylation activity on exogenous Bacillus/ Escherichia coli shuttle vector pBU4 as the HaeIII, which is an isoschizomer of BspRI. The Bsph_0498 (encoding the predicted LspC3–41IR) knockout mutant Δ0498 and the complement strain RC0498 were constructed. It was found that the unmethylated pBU4 can be digested by the CFE of C3–41 and RC0498, but not by that of Δ0498. Furthermore, the exogenous plasmid pBU4 can be transformed at very high efficacy into Δ0498, low efficacy into RC0498, but no transformation into C3–41, indicating that LspC3–41I might be a major determinant for the genetic restriction barrier of strain C3–41 . Besides, lspC3–41IR and lspC3–41IM genes are detected in other two strains besides C3–41 of the tested 16  L. sphaericus strains, which all belonging to serotype H5 and MLST sequence type (ST) 1. Furthermore, the three strains are not horizontal transferred, and this restriction could be overcome by in vitro methylation either by the host CFE or by commercial methytransferase M. HaeIII. The results provide an insight to further study the genetic restriction, modification and evolution of mosquitocidal L. sphaericus, also a theoretical basis and a method for the genetic manipulations of L. sphaericus.

          Conclusions

          LspC3–41I is identified as the major determinant for the restriction barrier of L. sphaericus C3–41 . Only three strains of the tested 16  L. sphaericus strains, which all belonging to serotype H5 and ST1 by MLST scheme, contain LspC3–41I system. Two different methods can be used to overcome the restriction barrier of the three isolates to get transformants efficiently: 1) to methylate plasmid DNA prior to the electroporation; and 2) to delete the major restriction endonuclease encoding gene lspC3–41IR.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A nomenclature for restriction enzymes, DNA methyltransferases, homing endonucleases and their genes.

          R Roberts (2003)
          A nomenclature is described for restriction endonucleases, DNA methyltransferases, homing endonucleases and related genes and gene products. It provides explicit categories for the many different Type II enzymes now identified and provides a system for naming the putative genes found by sequence analysis of microbial genomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution.

            Restriction-modification (RM) systems are composed of genes that encode a restriction enzyme and a modification methylase. RM systems sometimes behave as discrete units of life, like viruses and transposons. RM complexes attack invading DNA that has not been properly modified and thus may serve as a tool of defense for bacterial cells. However, any threat to their maintenance, such as a challenge by a competing genetic element (an incompatible plasmid or an allelic homologous stretch of DNA, for example) can lead to cell death through restriction breakage in the genome. This post-segregational or post-disturbance cell killing may provide the RM complexes (and any DNA linked with them) with a competitive advantage. There is evidence that they have undergone extensive horizontal transfer between genomes, as inferred from their sequence homology, codon usage bias and GC content difference. They are often linked with mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, viruses, transposons and integrons. The comparison of closely related bacterial genomes also suggests that, at times, RM genes themselves behave as mobile elements and cause genome rearrangements. Indeed some bacterial genomes that survived post-disturbance attack by an RM gene complex in the laboratory have experienced genome rearrangements. The avoidance of some restriction sites by bacterial genomes may result from selection by past restriction attacks. Both bacteriophages and bacteria also appear to use homologous recombination to cope with the selfish behavior of RM systems. RM systems compete with each other in several ways. One is competition for recognition sequences in post-segregational killing. Another is super-infection exclusion, that is, the killing of the cell carrying an RM system when it is infected with another RM system of the same regulatory specificity but of a different sequence specificity. The capacity of RM systems to act as selfish, mobile genetic elements may underlie the structure and function of RM enzymes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Type II restriction endonucleases: structure and mechanism.

              Type II restriction endonucleases are components of restriction modification systems that protect bacteria and archaea against invading foreign DNA. Most are homodimeric or tetrameric enzymes that cleave DNA at defined sites of 4-8 bp in length and require Mg2+ ions for catalysis. They differ in the details of the recognition process and the mode of cleavage, indicators that these enzymes are more diverse than originally thought. Still, most of them have a similar structural core and seem to share a common mechanism of DNA cleavage, suggesting that they evolved from a common ancestor. Only a few restriction endonucleases discovered thus far do not belong to the PD...D/ExK family of enzymes, but rather have active sites typical of other endonuclease families. The present review deals with new developments in the field of Type II restriction endonucleases. One of the more interesting aspects is the increasing awareness of the diversity of Type II restriction enzymes. Nevertheless, structural studies summarized herein deal with the more common subtypes. A major emphasis of this review will be on target site location and the mechanism of catalysis, two problems currently being addressed in the literature.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fupan8925@163.com
                ge_yong_@126.com
                ymwu2012@gmail.com
                278047036@qq.com
                86-27-87197242 , yzm@wh.iov.cn
                +86 27 87197242 , huxm@wh.iov.cn
                Journal
                BMC Microbiol
                BMC Microbiol
                BMC Microbiology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2180
                19 May 2017
                19 May 2017
                2017
                : 17
                : 116
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000119573309, GRID grid.9227.e, Wuhan Institute of Virology, , Chinese Academy of Sciences, ; Wuhan, 430071 China
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1797 8419, GRID grid.410726.6, , University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, ; Beijing, 100039 China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-5530
                Article
                1014
                10.1186/s12866-017-1014-6
                5437673
                28525986
                f2d235ee-941f-40e8-88d9-11e4a1c66ae9
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 January 2017
                : 26 April 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: NFSC (china)
                Award ID: 31570007
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Major Program Project
                Award ID: 2016YFC1201000
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Microbiology & Virology
                lysinibacillus sphaericus,r-m systems,cfe,methylation,lspc3–41i
                Microbiology & Virology
                lysinibacillus sphaericus, r-m systems, cfe, methylation, lspc3–41i

                Comments

                Comment on this article