+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Clinical and Hemodynamic Effects of Bosentan Dose Optimization in Symptomatic Heart Failure Patients with Severe Systolic Dysfunction, Associated with Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension – A Multi-Center Randomized Study

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          Objective: Toevaluate the effects of bosentan on echo-derived hemodynamic measurements, and clinical variables in symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients. Method: Multi- center, double-blind, randomized (2:1), placebo-controlled study comparing bosentan (8–125 mg b.i.d.) to placebo in patients with New York Heart Association class IIIb–IV HF, left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) >40 mm Hg. Primary and secondary endpoints were change from baseline to 20 weeks in SPAP and cardiac index, respectively. Safety endpoints were treatment emergent adverse events (AEs), change in body weight, hemoglobin, hematocrit, systolic blood pressure and diuretic use. Results: Ninety-four patients enrolled: 60 to bosentan, 34 to placebo. There was no significant difference between the 2 arms in SPAP change (0.1 ± 11.5 mm Hg , 95% confidence limit (CL) –5.4 to 5.2, p = 0.97), cardiac index shift (0.12 ± 0.45, 95% CL –0.09 to 0.33 , p = 0.24 ) or any of the other 22 echocardigraphic measurements obtained. Therapy-duration was longer in the placebo arm, while more patients in the bosentan arm experienced adverse and serious AEs. Conclusion: In HF patients with left ventricular dysfunction and secondary pulmonary hypertension, bosentan did not provide any measurable hemodynamic benefit, and was associated with more frequent AEs, requiring drug discontinuation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Long-term effects of darusentan on left-ventricular remodelling and clinical outcomes in the EndothelinA Receptor Antagonist Trial in Heart Failure (EARTH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

          Endothelin-receptor blockade provides haemodynamic benefit in experimental and clinical heart failure. We aimed to measure the effects of long-term endothelin-blockade on left-ventricular (LV) remodelling and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. 642 patients with chronic heart failure were assigned the oral endothelin(A)-antagonist darusentan at 10, 25, 50, 100, or 300 mg daily or placebo for 24 weeks in addition to standard therapy in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. In the 50-300 mg groups, darusentan was uptitrated over 6 weeks. Primary endpoint was change in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 24 weeks from baseline, measured by MRI. All patients for whom assessable MRI scans were available at baseline and follow-up were included in the analysis. Darusentan was well tolerated. LVESV could be assessed in 485 (76%) patients with paired MRI data at baseline and 6 months. The change in LVESV was not significantly different from that with placebo at any dose (mean difference from placebo 1.27 mL [95% CI -9.9 to 12.4] with 10 mg dose, -1.84 mL [-13.0 to 9.3] with 25 mg, -5.68 mL [-16.9 to 5.6] with 50 mg, -4.05 mL [-15.5 to 7.4] with 100 mg, and -4.34 mL [-15.7 to 7.0] with 300 mg). Heart failure worsened in 71 (11.1%) patients, and 30 (4.7%) died during the study with no difference between groups. Endothelin(A) blockade with darusentan did not improve cardiac remodelling or clinical symptoms or outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure receiving an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, beta blocker, or aldosterone antagonist. Thus, endothelin(A) blockade is unlikely to be useful as an add-on treatment in such patients.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical effects of endothelin receptor antagonism with bosentan in patients with severe chronic heart failure: results of a pilot study.

            Endothelin receptor antagonism produces favorable short-term hemodynamic effects in heart failure, but the clinical effects of longer term therapy have not been evaluated. Three hundred and seventy patients with symptoms of heart failure at rest or on minimal exertion and a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% were randomly assigned (double-blind) to placebo (n = 126) or the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan, titrated slowly (n = 121) or rapidly (n = 123) to a target dose of 500 mg twice daily. Treatment with the study drug was to be maintained for 26 weeks, whereas background medications for heart failure were kept constant. Safety concerns led to early termination of the trial when only 174 patients had had an opportunity to complete 26 weeks of therapy. Bosentan exerted no apparent benefit when all randomized patients were analyzed (P = .709). However, in the first 174 patients who were recruited at least 26 weeks before study termination and who could therefore be followed for the planned duration of the trial, patients in the bosentan groups were more likely to be improved (26% versus 19%) and were less likely to be worse (28% versus 43%), P = .045. When compared with placebo-treated patients, bosentan-treated patients had a increased risk of heart failure during the first month of treatment but a decreased risk of heart failure during the fourth, fifth, and sixth months of therapy. The major noncardiac adverse effects of bosentan included an increase in hepatic transaminases (in 15.6% of patients) and a decrease in hemoglobin (of about 1 g/L). Although bosentan exerted no favorable effects in the overall study, our findings suggest that the clinical responses to endothelin antagonism with bosentan in patients with severe chronic heart failure may be dependent on the duration of treatment.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Do results of the ENABLE (Endothelin Antagonist Bosentan for Lowering Cardiac Events in Heart Failure) study spell the end for non-selective endothelin antagonism in heart failure?

              The last two decades have seen major advances in the treatment of chronic heart failure, primarily as a result of therapeutic manipulation of activated neurohormonal systems. Despite this progress, many patients still suffer significant morbidity and premature death. Antagonism of the biological effects of endothelin, a potent vasoconstrictor, represents a further potential target. To date, positive results from animal models of heart failure have not been translated into clinical practice, perhaps as a consequence of the high doses of drug used. The ENABLE (Endothelin Antagonist Bosentan for Lowering Cardiac Events in Heart Failure) study evaluated the effects of low dose bosentan, a non-selective endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, New York Heart Association class IIIb-IV). A total of 1,613 patients were randomized to receive either bosentan (125 mg twice a day) or placebo. The preliminary results were presented at the 51st Annual Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology (17-20 March 2002, Atlanta, GA, USA). The primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure was reached in 321/808 patients on placebo and 312/805 receiving bosentan. Treatment with bosentan appeared to confer an early risk of worsening heart failure necessitating hospitalization, as a consequence of fluid retention. It has been suggested that further studies using even lower doses of bosentan or more aggressive concomitant diuretic therapy may avoid this adverse effect. The results from the ENABLE study have, however, thrown further doubt on the potential benefits of non-specific endothelin receptor blockade in heart failure.

                Author and article information

                S. Karger AG
                March 2008
                17 September 2007
                : 109
                : 4
                : 273-280
                aDepartment of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry, Newark, N.J., USA; bDepartment of Cardiology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; cKaplan Medical Center, Department of Cardiology Rehovot, Hebrew University Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; dActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Switzerland; eDuke Cardiology Research Center, Durham, N.C., USA; fWolfson Medical Center, Holon, and University of Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel; gDepartment of Cardiology, Barzilay Medical Center, Ashkelon, and Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
                107791 Cardiology 2008;109:273–280
                © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, References: 17, Pages: 8
                Original Research


                Comment on this article