36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genomic Prediction of Autotetraploids; Influence of Relationship Matrices, Allele Dosage, and Continuous Genotyping Calls in Phenotype Prediction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Estimation of allele dosage, using genomic data, in autopolyploids is challenging and current methods often result in the misclassification of genotypes. Some progress has been made when using SNP arrays, but the major challenge is when using next generation sequencing data. Here we compare the use of read depth as continuous parameterization with ploidy parameterizations in the context of genomic selection (GS). Additionally, different sources of information to build relationship matrices were compared. A real breeding population of the autotetraploid species blueberry ( Vaccinium corybosum), composed of 1,847 individuals was phenotyped for eight yield and fruit quality traits over two years. Continuous genotypic based models performed as well as the best models. This approach also reduces the computational time and avoids problems associated with misclassification of genotypic classes when assigning dosage in polyploid species. This approach could be very valuable for species with higher ploidy levels or for emerging crops where ploidy is not well understood. To our knowledge, this work constitutes the first study of genomic selection in blueberry. Accuracies are encouraging for application of GS for blueberry breeding. GS could reduce the time for cultivar release by three years, increasing the genetic gain per cycle by 86% on average when compared to phenotypic selection, and 32% when compared with pedigree-based selection. Finally, the genotypic and phenotypic data used in this study are made available for comparative analysis of dosage calling and genomic selection prediction models in the context of autopolyploids.

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids.

          Polyploidy has long been recognized as a prominent force shaping the evolution of eukaryotes, especially flowering plants. New phenotypes often arise with polyploid formation and can contribute to the success of polyploids in nature or their selection for use in agriculture. Although the causes of novel variation in polyploids are not well understood, they could involve changes in gene expression through increased variation in dosage-regulated gene expression, altered regulatory interactions, and rapid genetic and epigenetic changes. New research approaches are being used to study these mechanisms and the results should provide a more complete understanding of polyploidy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing.

            Most eukaryotes have genomes that exhibit high levels of gene redundancy, much of which seems to have arisen from one or more cycles of genome doubling. Polyploidy has been particularly prominent during flowering plant evolution, yielding duplicated genes (homoeologs) whose expression may be retained or lost either as an immediate consequence of polyploidization or on an evolutionary timescale. Expression of 40 homoeologous gene pairs was assayed by cDNA-single-stranded conformation polymorphism in natural (1- to 2-million-yr-old) and synthetic tetraploid cotton (Gossypium) to determine whether homoeologous gene pairs are expressed at equal levels after polyploid formation. Silencing or unequal expression of one homoeolog was documented for 10 of 40 genes examined in ovules of Gossypium hirsutum. Assays of homoeolog expression in 10 organs revealed variable expression levels and silencing, depending on the gene and organ examined. Remarkably, silencing and biased expression of some gene pairs are reciprocal and developmentally regulated, with one homoeolog showing silencing in some organs and the other being silenced in other organs, suggesting rapid subfunctionalization. Duplicate gene expression was examined in additional natural polyploids to characterize the pace at which expression alteration evolves. Analysis of a synthetic tetraploid revealed homoeolog expression and silencing patterns that sometimes mirrored those of the natural tetraploid. Both long-term and immediate responses to polyploidization were implicated. Data suggest that some silencing events are epigenetically induced during the allopolyploidization process.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

              The genomic prediction of phenotypes and breeding values in animals and plants has developed rapidly into its own research field. Results of genomic prediction studies are often difficult to compare because data simulation varies, real or simulated data are not fully described, and not all relevant results are reported. In addition, some new methods have been compared only in limited genetic architectures, leading to potentially misleading conclusions. In this article we review simulation procedures, discuss validation and reporting of results, and apply benchmark procedures for a variety of genomic prediction methods in simulated and real example data. Plant and animal breeding programs are being transformed by the use of genomic data, which are becoming widely available and cost-effective to predict genetic merit. A large number of genomic prediction studies have been published using both simulated and real data. The relative novelty of this area of research has made the development of scientific conventions difficult with regard to description of the real data, simulation of genomes, validation and reporting of results, and forward in time methods. In this review article we discuss the generation of simulated genotype and phenotype data, using approaches such as the coalescent and forward in time simulation. We outline ways to validate simulated data and genomic prediction results, including cross-validation. The accuracy and bias of genomic prediction are highlighted as performance indicators that should be reported. We suggest that a measure of relatedness between the reference and validation individuals be reported, as its impact on the accuracy of genomic prediction is substantial. A large number of methods were compared in example simulated and real (pine and wheat) data sets, all of which are publicly available. In our limited simulations, most methods performed similarly in traits with a large number of quantitative trait loci (QTL), whereas in traits with fewer QTL variable selection did have some advantages. In the real data sets examined here all methods had very similar accuracies. We conclude that no single method can serve as a benchmark for genomic prediction. We recommend comparing accuracy and bias of new methods to results from genomic best linear prediction and a variable selection approach (e.g., BayesB), because, together, these methods are appropriate for a range of genetic architectures. An accompanying article in this issue provides a comprehensive review of genomic prediction methods and discusses a selection of topics related to application of genomic prediction in plants and animals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                G3 (Bethesda)
                Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
                Genetics Society of America
                2160-1836
                19 February 2019
                April 2019
                : 9
                : 4
                : 1189-1198
                Affiliations
                [* ]Blueberry Breeding and Genomics Lab
                []Sweet Corn Genomics and Breeding, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
                []Plant Genetics and Genomics Lab, Agronomy College, Federal University of Goias, GO, Brazil, 74690-900
                [§ ]Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
                [** ]Forest Genomics Lab, School of Forestry Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610
                Author notes
                [1 ]Corresponding author: Blueberry Breeding & Genomics Lab, University of Florida, 2550 Hull Road, P.O. Box 110690, Gainesville, FL, 32611; E-mail: p.munoz@ 123456ufl.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3723-9747
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2367-0766
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9655-4838
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5127-4448
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0957-4337
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8973-9351
                Article
                GGG_400059
                10.1534/g3.119.400059
                6469427
                30782769
                f327b598-79da-44c6-b22b-92af4162ff3f
                Copyright © 2019 de Bem Oliveira et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 October 2018
                : 13 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 1, References: 60, Pages: 10
                Categories
                Genomic Prediction

                Genetics
                autopolyploid,allelic dosage,genomic selection,relationship matrices,vaccinium,blueberry,shared data,genomic prediction,genpred,shared data resources

                Comments

                Comment on this article