22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Radiocarbon chronology of Neolithic and Predynastic sites in Upper Egypt and the Delta

      The African Archaeological Review
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          PROCEDURES FOR COMPARING AND COMBINING RADIOCARBON AGE DETERMINATIONS: A CRITIQUE

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Calibration of radiocarbon dates: tables based on the consensus data of the Workshop on Calibrating the Radiocarbon Time Scale

            A calibration is presented for conventional radiocarbon ages ranging from 10 to 7240 years BP and thus covering a calendric range of 8000 years from 6050 BC to AD 1950. Distinctive features of this calibration include 1) an improved data set consisting of 1154 radiocarbon measurements on samples of known age, 2) an extended range over which radiocarbon ages may be calibrated (an additional 530 years), 3) separate 95% confidence intervals (in tabular from) for six different radiocarbon uncertainties (20, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300 years), and 4) an estimate of the non-Poisson errors related to radiocarbon determinations, including an estimate of the systematic errors between laboratories.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Testing Contemporaneity and Averaging Radiocarbon Dates

              Techniques for pragmatically interpreting arrays of radiocarbon dates are given. These include weighted averaging, statistical rejection of data, and the evaluation of contemporaneity. Commonly encountered situations are discussed with several actual examples to illustrate these procedures. This paper is Contribution No. 70, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The African Archaeological Review
                Afr Archaeol Rev
                Springer Nature
                0263-0338
                1572-9842
                1985
                1985
                : 3
                : 1
                : 95-115
                Article
                10.1007/BF01117456
                f33c60f4-fdbf-4977-b6f0-537d352baf80
                © 1985
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log