78
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quantifying Beetle-Mediated Effects on Gas Fluxes from Dung Pats

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Agriculture is one of the largest contributors of the anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) responsible for global warming. Measurements of gas fluxes from dung pats suggest that dung is a source of GHGs, but whether these emissions are modified by arthropods has not been studied. A closed chamber system was used to measure the fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO 2), methane (CH 4) and nitrous oxide (N 2O) from dung pats with and without dung beetles on a grass sward. The presence of dung beetles significantly affected the fluxes of GHGs from dung pats. Most importantly, fresh dung pats emitted higher amounts of CO 2 and lower amounts of CH 4 per day in the presence than absence of beetles. Emissions of N 2O showed a distinct peak three weeks after the start of the experiment – a pattern detected only in the presence of beetles. When summed over the main grazing season (June–July), total emissions of CH 4 proved significantly lower, and total emissions of N 2O significantly higher in the presence than absence of beetles. While clearly conditional on the experimental conditions, the patterns observed here reveal a potential impact of dung beetles on gas fluxes realized at a small spatial scale, and thereby suggest that arthropods may have an overall effect on gas fluxes from agriculture. Dissecting the exact mechanisms behind these effects, mapping out the range of conditions under which they occur, and quantifying effect sizes under variable environmental conditions emerge as key priorities for further research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe.

          The livestock sector contributes considerably to global greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). Here, for the year 2007 we examined GHG emissions in the EU27 livestock sector and estimated GHG emissions from production and consumption of livestock products; including imports, exports and wastage. We also reviewed available mitigation options and estimated their potential. The focus of this review is on the beef and dairy sector since these contribute 60% of all livestock production emissions. Particular attention is paid to the role of land use and land use change (LULUC) and carbon sequestration in grasslands. GHG emissions of all livestock products amount to between 630 and 863 Mt CO2 e, or 12-17% of total EU27 GHG emissions in 2007. The highest emissions aside from production, originate from LULUC, followed by emissions from wasted food. The total GHG mitigation potential from the livestock sector in Europe is between 101 and 377 Mt CO2 e equivalent to between 12 and 61% of total EU27 livestock sector emissions in 2007. A reduction in food waste and consumption of livestock products linked with reduced production, are the most effective mitigation options, and if encouraged, would also deliver environmental and human health benefits. Production of beef and dairy on grassland, as opposed to intensive grain fed production, can be associated with a reduction in GHG emissions depending on actual LULUC emissions. This could be promoted on rough grazing land where appropriate. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cow-dung colonization and decomposition following insect exclusion.

            The rate of dung-pat degradation in cattle pastures in south west England was examined between May and September 2002, using batches of standardized, 1.5 kg, artificially-formed cow pats. In pats in which insects were allowed free access, the rate of disappearance, measured as ash-free dry weight, was faster in spring than summer and the loss of organic matter ranged between 0.69 and 1.99% per day, equating to an estimated time for complete disappearance of 57-78 and 88-111 days in spring and summer, respectively. To assess the role of colonizing insects on decomposition, six batches of pats were constructed and either left uncovered or, using fine mesh cages, were covered for 2, 7 or 14 days following deposition to exclude colonizing insects, after which they were uncovered. After 35 days all pats were then retrieved from the field, the composition of the invertebrate community within each pat was determined and the degree of degradation, measured as ash-free dry weight, was assessed. Covered pats had significantly higher rates of ash-free dry weight loss than uncovered pats. From the 180 pats that were recovered and searched, larvae of Aphodius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) were the most numerous taxon collected (1435 individuals). Aphodius larvae were significantly more abundant in pats that remained uncovered or were covered for 2 days only, compared to pats that had been covered for 7 or 14 days. The results show that the exclusion of insects for as little as two days following deposition causes a significant reduction in both the insect population and the subsequent rate of pat degradation.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Contributors
              Role: Editor
              Journal
              PLoS One
              PLoS ONE
              plos
              plosone
              PLoS ONE
              Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
              1932-6203
              2013
              7 August 2013
              : 8
              : 8
              : e71454
              Affiliations
              [1 ]Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
              [2 ]Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
              [3 ]Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
              [4 ]Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
              [5 ]Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
              University College London, United Kingdom
              Author notes

              Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

              Conceived and designed the experiments: AP T. Roslin T. Riutta AS KM ES. Performed the experiments: AP AS T. Roslin. Analyzed the data: T. Roslin AP AS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AP AS. Wrote the paper: T. Roslin AP ES.

              Article
              PONE-D-13-00713
              10.1371/journal.pone.0071454
              3737124
              23940758
              f372dbd7-54f7-4276-a7df-6d609081a5da
              Copyright @ 2013

              This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

              History
              : 28 December 2012
              : 2 July 2013
              Page count
              Pages: 7
              Funding
              This study was supported by grants from the Academy of Finland ( http://www.aka.fi/en-GB/A/; grant number 138346 to T. Roslin) and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo ( http://www.vanamo.fi/; a thesis grant to A. Penttilä). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
              Categories
              Research Article
              Agriculture
              Agroecology
              Ecosystems Agroecology
              Biology
              Ecology
              Ecosystems
              Ecosystem Functioning
              Agroecology
              Global Change Ecology
              Terrestrial Ecology
              Zoology
              Entomology
              Earth Sciences
              Atmospheric Science
              Climatology
              Climate Change

              Uncategorized
              Uncategorized

              Comments

              Comment on this article