1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of deep space radiation on cognitive performance: From biological sex to biomarkers to countermeasures

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract

          Space radiation affects memory in male and not in female mice, and it is dependent on the innate immune system response.

          Abstract

          In the coming decade, astronauts will travel back to the moon in preparation for future Mars missions. Exposure to galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) is a major obstacle for deep space travel. Using multivariate principal components analysis, we found sex-dimorphic responses in mice exposed to accelerated charged particles to simulate GCR (GCRsim); males displayed impaired spatial learning, whereas females did not. Mechanistically, these GCRsim-induced learning impairments corresponded with chronic microglia activation and synaptic alterations in the hippocampus. Temporary microglia depletion shortly after GCRsim exposure mitigated GCRsim-induced deficits measured months after the radiation exposure. Furthermore, blood monocyte levels measured early after GCRsim exposure were predictive of the late learning deficits and microglia activation measured in the male mice. Our findings (i) advance our understanding of charged particle–induced cognitive challenges, (ii) provide evidence for early peripheral biomarkers for identifying late cognitive deficits, and (iii) offer potential therapeutic strategies for mitigating GCR-induced cognitive loss.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Microglia Biology: One Century of Evolving Concepts

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain.

            The colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) is a key regulator of myeloid lineage cells. Genetic loss of the CSF1R blocks the normal population of resident microglia in the brain that originates from the yolk sac during early development. However, the role of CSF1R signaling in microglial homeostasis in the adult brain is largely unknown. To this end, we tested the effects of selective CSF1R inhibitors on microglia in adult mice. Surprisingly, extensive treatment results in elimination of ∼99% of all microglia brain-wide, showing that microglia in the adult brain are physiologically dependent upon CSF1R signaling. Mice depleted of microglia show no behavioral or cognitive abnormalities, revealing that microglia are not necessary for these tasks. Finally, we discovered that the microglia-depleted brain completely repopulates with new microglia within 1 week of inhibitor cessation. Microglial repopulation throughout the CNS occurs through proliferation of nestin-positive cells that then differentiate into microglia. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The use of a plus-maze to measure anxiety in the mouse.

              R Lister (1987)
              To investigate whether an elevated plus-maze consisting of two open and two closed arms could be used as a model of anxiety in the mouse, NIH Swiss mice were tested in the apparatus immediately after a holeboard test. Factor analysis of data from undrugged animals tested in the holeboard and plus-maze yielded three orthogonal factors interpreted as assessing anxiety, directed exploration and locomotion. Anxiolytic drugs (chlordiazepoxide, sodium pentobarbital and ethanol) increased the proportion of time spent on the open arms, and anxiogenic drugs (FG 7142, caffeine and picrotoxin) reduced this measure. Amphetamine and imipramine failed to alter the indices of anxiety. The anxiolytic effect of chlordiazepoxide was reduced in mice that had previously experienced the plus-maze in an undrugged state. Testing animals in the holeboard immediately before the plus-maze test significantly elevated both the percentage of time spent on the open arms and the total number of arm entries, but did not affect the behavioral response to chlordiazepoxide. The plus-maze appears to be a useful test with which to investigate both anxiolytic and anxiogenic agents.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - original draftRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - original draftRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: Visualization
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Investigation
                Role: Data curationRole: Investigation
                Role: Investigation
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Investigation
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - original draftRole: Writing - review & editing
                Journal
                Sci Adv
                sciadv
                advances
                Science Advances
                American Association for the Advancement of Science
                2375-2548
                October 2021
                15 October 2021
                : 7
                : 42
                : eabg6702
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
                [2 ]Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
                [3 ]Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
                [4 ]Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
                [5 ]Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
                [6 ]San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
                [7 ]Kavli Institute of Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Email: susanna.rosi@ 123456ucsf.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-8917
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6009-0170
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-7233
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0843-2444
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-1608
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-3638
                Article
                abg6702
                10.1126/sciadv.abg6702
                8519563
                34652936
                f375d14c-8418-453e-9f06-7c78ebffa8a3
                Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 20 January 2021
                : 20 August 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001, National Science Foundation;
                Award ID: Graduate Fellowship Program
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000065, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke;
                Award ID: R01NS088475
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000065, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke;
                Award ID: UG3NS106899
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000104, National Aeronautics and Space Administration;
                Award ID: NNX14AC94G
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005191, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation;
                Award ID: NNX14AC94G
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005191, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation;
                Award ID: 80NSSC19K1581
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005191, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation;
                Award ID: R25GM056847
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005191, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation;
                Award ID: 1I01RX002245
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005191, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation;
                Award ID: I01RX002787
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100018989, Foundation for Advanced Research;
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005191, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation;
                Funded by: Sally Casanova Pre-Doctoral Scholarship;
                Funded by: UCSF Summer Research Training Program;
                Funded by: National Aeronautic Space Administration;
                Award ID: NNX14AC94G and 80NSSC19K1581
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008069, University of California, San Francisco;
                Award ID: 80NSSC19K1581
                Funded by: National Institute for General Medicine Initiative for Maximizing Student Development;
                Award ID: R25GM056847
                Categories
                Research Article
                Neuroscience
                SciAdv r-articles
                Neuroscience
                Space Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Custom metadata
                Vivian Hernandez

                Comments

                Comment on this article