9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Trophic evolution in African citharinoid fishes (Teleostei: Characiformes) and the origin of intraordinal pterygophagy.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The African freshwater suborder Citharinoidei (Characiformes) includes 110 species that exhibit a diversity of feeding modes comparable to those characteristic of more speciose groups such its sister, the Characoidei (2000+ species) or the distantly related Cichlidae (1600+ species). Feeding habits of the Citharinoidei range from generalist omnivores to highly specialized feeding modes including ectoparasitic fin-eating, i.e. pterygophagy. We examine diet preference evolution in the Citharinoidei using newly inferred multi-gene-based hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships for representatives of 12 of the 15 genera in the suborder. Ancestral character state reconstructions onto our best tree indicate that the three most-generalist diets - pelophage/planktivore, omnivore and invertivore - are also the most primitive conditions within the Citharinoidei. The feeding mode of the most recent common ancestor of the Citharinoidei was characterized by high uncertainty. The more specialized feeding habits - herbivory, piscivory and pterygophagy - originated later in the Citharinoidei, likely from invertivore ancestors and possibly across a short time period. Highly specialized fin eaters (Belonophago, Phago and Eugnatichthys) share a common origin along with a strict piscivore (Mesoborus) and an invertivore (Microstomatichthyoborus). The largely piscivorous, but facultative fin eater, Ichthyborus is not exclusively related to them. Our results demonstrate that overall diet preference transitions in the Citharinoidei were rare events with very few reversals or parallelisms, and that evolutionary shifts in trophic ecology have not played a major role in intraordinal diversification. This situation contrasts with other groups in which dietary transitions have played key roles in species diversification.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
          Molecular phylogenetics and evolution
          Elsevier BV
          1095-9513
          1055-7903
          May 03 2017
          : 113
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan. Electronic address: microceb@hotmail.com.
          [2 ] Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
          [3 ] Museum of Zoology and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
          [4 ] Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
          [5 ] Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
          [6 ] Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
          [7 ] Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba 277-8564, Japan.
          Article
          S1055-7903(16)30481-X
          10.1016/j.ympev.2017.05.001
          28478196
          f3b579c5-b99e-4f2a-8118-2d56bb1cc656
          History

          Africa,Characiformes,Freshwater fishes,Trophic diversification

          Comments

          Comment on this article