10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High-Frequency 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Refractory Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: 12-Month Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article
      , MD a , , , MD c , , MD d , , PhD e , , MD f , , MD g , , MD h , , MD i , , MD, PhD j , , MD l , , MD m , , DO m , , MD c , , DO n , , MD o , , MD p , , MD q , , MD r , , MD, PhD s , , MD t , , MD u , , MD b , , MD u , , MD i , , MD d , , MD o , , MD v , , MD w , , MD k , , PhD x , , MD, PhD e , , MD, PhD j
      Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes
      Elsevier
      CMM, conventional medical management, DN4, Douleur Neuropathique, DSPN, diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy, EQ-5D-5L, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire, HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c, HRQoL, health-related quality of life, IPG, implantable pulse generator, NNT, number needed to treat, PDN, painful diabetic neuropathy, RCT, randomized controlled trial, SCS, spinal cord stimulation, VAS, visual analog scale

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To evaluate high-frequency (10-kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) treatment in refractory painful diabetic neuropathy.

          Patients and Methods

          A prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted between Aug 28, 2017 and March 16, 2021, comparing conventional medical management (CMM) with 10-kHz SCS+CMM. The participants had hemoglobin A1c level of less than or equal to 10% and pain greater than or equal to 5 of 10 cm on visual analog scale, with painful diabetic neuropathy symptoms 12 months or more refractory to gabapentinoids and at least 1 other analgesic class. Assessments included measures of pain, neurologic function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over 12 months with optional crossover at 6 months.

          Results

          The participants were randomized 1:1 to CMM (n=103) or 10-kHz SCS+CMM (n=113). At 6 months, 77 of 95 (81%) CMM group participants opted for crossover, whereas none of the 10-kHz SCS group participants did so. At 12 months, the mean pain relief from baseline among participants implanted with 10-kHz SCS was 74.3% (95% CI, 70.1-78.5), and 121 of 142 (85%) participants were treatment responders (≥50% pain relief). Treatment with 10-kHz SCS improved HRQoL, including a mean improvement in the EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire index score of 0.136 (95% CI, 0.104-0.169). The participants also reported significantly less pain interference with sleep, mood, and daily activities. At 12 months, 131 of 142 (92%) participants were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the 10-kHz SCS treatment.

          Conclusion

          The 10-kHz SCS treatment resulted in substantial pain relief and improvement in overall HRQoL 2.5- to 4.5-fold higher than the minimal clinically important difference. The outcomes were durable over 12 months and support 10-kHz SCS treatment in patients with refractory painful diabetic neuropathy.

          Trial registration

          clincaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03228420

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          WITHDRAWN: Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition

          To provide global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

            Purpose This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure. Methods EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions. Results Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states. Conclusions A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              New drug treatments, clinical trials, and standards of quality for assessment of evidence justify an update of evidence-based recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), we revised the Special Interest Group on Neuropathic Pain (NeuPSIG) recommendations for the pharmacotherapy of neuropathic pain based on the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes
                Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes
                Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes
                Elsevier
                2542-4548
                01 July 2022
                August 2022
                01 July 2022
                : 6
                : 4
                : 347-360
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
                [b ]Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
                [c ]Advanced Pain Management, Greenfield, WI
                [d ]Pain Management Associates, Lee’s Summit, MO
                [e ]Nevro Corp, Redwood City, CA
                [f ]AES Compass Orlando, Orlando, FL
                [g ]Touchstone Interventional Pain Center, Medford, OR
                [h ]IPM Medical Group, Walnut Creek, CA
                [i ]Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA
                [j ]Department of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
                [k ]Department of Endocrinology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
                [l ]Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
                [m ]Nevada Advanced Pain Specialists, Reno, NV
                [n ]Central Florida Pain Relief Centers, Orlando, FL
                [o ]Pain Care, Stockbridge, GA
                [p ]Coastal Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Bradenton, FL
                [q ]Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
                [r ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
                [s ]Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
                [t ]Boston PainCare, Waltham, MA
                [u ]Department of Neurosurgery, United Health Services, Johnson City, NY
                [v ]Holy Cross Hospital, Fort Lauderdale, FL
                [w ]Department of Neurology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY
                [x ]MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence: Address to Erika A. Petersen, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205. eapetersen@ 123456uams.edu
                Article
                S2542-4548(22)00029-7
                10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.05.003
                9256824
                35814185
                f3de7670-acbd-4189-a000-b83a8e8c1093
                © 2022 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                cmm, conventional medical management,dn4, douleur neuropathique,dspn, diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy,eq-5d-5l, euroqol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire,hba1c, hemoglobin a1c,hrqol, health-related quality of life,ipg, implantable pulse generator,nnt, number needed to treat,pdn, painful diabetic neuropathy,rct, randomized controlled trial,scs, spinal cord stimulation,vas, visual analog scale

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content196

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors897