19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Some like it hot (ever more so in the tropics): A puzzle with no solution

      article-commentary
      Temperature: Multidisciplinary Biomedical Journal
      Taylor & Francis

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Reply to: Abdel-Salam OME. Preference for hot pepper: A complex interplay of personal, cultural, and pharmacological effects. Temperature 2016; 3:38-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2015.1111289; Bosland PW. Hot stuff – do people living in hot climates like their food spicy hot or not? Temperature 2016; 3:40-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2015.1130521; Caterina MJ. Seeking the tropical heat – a matter of microbes? Temperature 2016; 3:42-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2016.1139963; Chahl LA. Hot genes and hot tropics. Temperature 2016; 3:45-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2015.1133878; Gutierrez R, Simon SA. Why do people living in hot climates like their food spicy? Temperature 2016; 3:47-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2015.1119616; Mózsik G. It remains a mystery why people living in hot climates consume spicier food. Temperature 2016; 3:49-50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2015.1131033; Thornton JS. Spicy heat love: less taste than protection from food poisoning? Temperature 2016; 3:51-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2015.1130522 Dear Editor-in-Chief, This is my reply to the answers 1-7 submitted in response to my “puzzle” as to “Why do people living in hot climates consume more hot pepper than those living in the North?” 8 With an estimated quarter of the World's population eating hot pepper on a daily basis, capsaicin represents an aspect of pharmacology intimately familiar to many readers of Temperature. 9 Yet, some fundamental questions remain unanswered in this field, mainly due to lack of research. Most experts agree that during evolution pepper plants developed capsaicin synthesis as a “biological weapon” to protect themselves against herbivores, but not birds who spread their seeds. 9 Indeed, capsaicin-flavored bird seeds are commercially available to repel squirrels and other rodents from the bird-feeder. 10 So why is it that the same taste which is unpalatable to rodents (and many other mammals like deer and elk) is found pleasurable by many humans including the author of this Letter? And why is it that most capsaicin-loving people seem to live in the tropics? Surprisingly, each and every author of the seven letters have agreed to discount the popular theory that capsaicin is popular under hot climates because it provides a cooling effect through “gustatory sweating” (“capsaicin-as-air conditioner”). Maybe less surprisingly, they agreed on nothing else. A slight majority of the contributors favor the “Darwinian gastronomy” concept of Sherman 11 that posits an antimicrobial-food preserving effect for capsaicin (“capsaicin-as-refrigerator”). Others speculate that people eat capsaicin-flavored food because it makes them feel good through releasing endorphins in the brain. Most authors also mention the possibility that eating “hot” food is a cultural phenomenon, an acquired taste. That is, people living in hot climates traditionally consume more hot pepper because this is where chili peppers grow in abundance. Personally, I find all of these theories unsatisfying. For example, a study of capsaicin effects on food-born pathogens found that capsaicin inhibited the growth of E. coli only at concentrations as high as 300 μg/ml. 12 This concentration (0.03%) is close to those (0.1%) present in topical capsaicin creams used for pain relief, and is unlikely to be achieved if food preparations (of note, the German Health Authorities consider spicy sauces with capsaicin concentrations of 0.1% or more unhealthy to eat). 13 As to the “feel-good” effect, it begs the question why capsaicin causes endorphin run in Indians (who consume plenty of capsaicin) but not in Norwegians (who do not)? I find the cultural concept the most believable though it fails to explain why food is usually mild in Italy or Spain, countries where hot pepper was introduced centuries ago and where the climate is favorable for growing this plant. In summary, in my opinion the biological basis of the popularity of hot pepper in tropical countries remains enigmatic, and thus my puzzle remains unsolved.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Seed dispersal. Directed deterrence by capsaicin in chilies.

          The primary function of ripe, fleshy fruit is to facilitate seed dispersal by attracting consumers, yet many fruits contain unpleasant-tasting chemicals that deter consumption by vertebrates. Here we investigate this paradox in the chili (Capsicum) and find that capsaicin, the chemical responsible for the fruit's peppery heat, selectively discourages vertebrate predators without deterring more effective seed dispersers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A field test of the directed deterrence hypothesis in two species of wild chili.

            The directed deterrence hypothesis posits that secondary metabolites in ripe fruit function to deter fruit consumption by vertebrates that do not disperse seeds, while not impacting consumption by those that do. We tested this hypothesis in two species of wild chilies (Capsicum spp.). Both produce fruits that contain capsaicinoids, the compounds responsible for the pungency of chilies. Previous work suggests seed-dispersing birds but not seed-destroying rodents consume chili fruits, presumably because rodents are deterred by capsaicin. However, fruit removal from chili plants by rodents and other mammals has not been previously explored. Because laboratory rodents can develop a preference for capsaicin, it is quite possible that wild rodents are natural consumers of chili fruits. We monitored the fate of 125 marked fruits of Capsicum chacoense and 291 fruits of Capsicum annuum. For both species, essentially all fruit removal occurred during the day, when rodents are inactive. Video monitoring revealed fruit removal only by birds, mostly by species known to disperse chili seeds in viable condition. Furthermore, these species are from taxonomic groups that tend to specialize on lipid-rich fruits. Both species of chili produce fruits that are unusually high in lipids (35% in C. chacoense, 24% in C. annuum). These results support the directed deterrence hypothesis and suggest that fruiting plants distinguish between seed predators and seed dispersers by producing fruits that repel the former and attract the latter.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Protecting western redcedar from deer browsing—with a passing reference to TRP channels

              This editorial is about tree farming. It proposes to test in an experiment whether co-planting (in the same hole) western redcedar (WRC, Thuja plicata) with Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) protects WRC seedlings from wildlife browsing. This sustainable protection method is an alternative to the traditional use of mechanical devices and big-game repellents. Many repellents contain transient receptor potential (TRP) agonists, such as capsaicin, a TRP vanilloid-1 agonist. This editorial also delivers a puzzle: while herbivores avoid capsaicin, why do people living in hot climates consume large quantities of it (in chili peppers)?
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Temperature (Austin)
                Temperature (Austin)
                KTMP
                Temperature: Multidisciplinary Biomedical Journal
                Taylor & Francis
                2332-8940
                2332-8959
                Jan-Mar 2016
                19 January 2016
                19 January 2016
                : 3
                : 1
                : 54-55
                Affiliations
                Department of Pathology,Monmouth Medical Center Long Branch, 07740, NJ, USA ASzallasi@ 123456barnabashealth.org
                Article
                1139964
                10.1080/23328940.2016.1139964
                4879781
                27227097
                f3ed90e7-603b-402f-95d5-1a1238347980
                © 2016 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

                History
                : 28 December 2015
                : 28 December 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 13, Pages: 2
                Categories
                Front Mater: Replies

                Comments

                Comment on this article