19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Electronic health record phenotyping improves detection and screening of type 2 diabetes in the general United States population: A cross-sectional, unselected, retrospective study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          An estimated 25% of type two diabetes mellitus (DM2) patients in the United States are undiagnosed due to inadequate screening, because it is prohibitive to administer laboratory tests to everyone. We assess whether electronic health record (EHR) phenotyping could improve DM2 screening compared to conventional models, even when records are incomplete and not recorded systematically across patients and practice locations, as is typically seen in practice.

          Methods

          In this cross-sectional, retrospective study, EHR data from 9948 US patients were used to develop a pre-screening tool to predict current DM2, using multivariate logistic regression and a random-forests probabilistic model for out-of-sample validation. We compared (1) a full EHR model containing commonly prescribed medications, diagnoses (as ICD9 categories), and conventional predictors, (2) a restricted EHR DX model which excluded medications, and (3) a conventional model containing basic predictors and their interactions (BMI, age, sex, smoking status, hypertension).

          Results

          Using a patient’s full EHR or restricted EHR was superior to using basic covariates alone for detecting individuals with diabetes (hierarchical X 2 test, p < 0.001). Migraines, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and cardiac dysrhythmias were associated negatively with DM2, while sexual and gender identity disorder diagnosis, viral and chlamydial infections, and herpes zoster were associated positively. Adding EHR phenotypes improved classification; the AUC for the full EHR Model, EHR DX model, and conventional model using logistic regression, were 84.9%, 83.2%, and 75.0% respectively. For random forest machine learning out-of-sample prediction, accuracy also was improved when using EHR phenotypes; the AUC values were 81.3%, 79.6%, and 74.8%, respectively. Improved AUCs reflect better performance for most thresholds that balance sensitivity and specificity.

          Conclusions

          EHR phenotyping resulted in markedly superior detection of DM2, even in the face of missing and unsystematically recorded data, based on the ROC curves. EHR phenotypes could more efficiently identify which patients do require, and don’t require, further laboratory screening. When applied to the current number of undiagnosed individuals in the United States, we predict that incorporating EHR phenotype screening would identify an additional 400,000 patients with active, untreated diabetes compared to the conventional pre-screening models.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          100970413
          22289
          J Biomed Inform
          J Biomed Inform
          Journal of biomedical informatics
          1532-0464
          1532-0480
          30 October 2017
          17 December 2015
          April 2016
          09 November 2017
          : 60
          : 162-168
          Affiliations
          [a ]Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
          [b ]Department of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, United States
          [c ]Departments of Psychology, Neurology, Radiology, Biomedical Engineering, Biomedical Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
          [d ]California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author at: Semel Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Ste B8-169, Los, Angeles, CA 90095-1406, United States. Tel.: +1 (310) 254 5680. WesleyTK@ 123456UCLA.edu (W.T. Kerr)
          Article
          PMC5679210 PMC5679210 5679210 nihpa863818
          10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.006
          5679210
          26707455
          f3f1c3c9-0e3e-45ed-acea-6dd73217547c
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Electronic health records,Population screening,Phenotype,Evidence-based medicine,Type 2 diabetes

          Comments

          Comment on this article